about question
What are the saved reaction/pic-related pictures you have been waiting to use in a question post like this, maybe with a funny caption matching the content of the question?
I have quite a few funny expressions saved as reply options, but I've barely found posts to use them in. Surely I'm not the only one.
Show me your funny stuff, I'm bored. (〜￣△￣)〜
I have quite a few funny expressions saved as reply options, but I've barely found posts to use them in. Surely I'm not the only one.
Show me your funny stuff, I'm bored. (〜￣△￣)〜
about question
Okay, I'll make it quick. (Felt weird, might delete later.)
- Farmers have sheep.
- Dogs like Kangals and Maremmas protect sheep, VERY efficiently. Worldwide. Which I told them about, but they somehow disagreed with because their's wasn't trained (so of course the entire breed faction is shit, obviously).
- Farmer complains about dog doing it's job and off-ing badgers, foxes and such because now THEY, as the owner, don't wanna bother getting rid of the carcass.
Is the farmer a literal, clinical idiot or am I trippin? (￣∇￣")
- Farmers have sheep.
- Dogs like Kangals and Maremmas protect sheep, VERY efficiently. Worldwide. Which I told them about, but they somehow disagreed with because their's wasn't trained (so of course the entire breed faction is shit, obviously).
- Farmer complains about dog doing it's job and off-ing badgers, foxes and such because now THEY, as the owner, don't wanna bother getting rid of the carcass.
Is the farmer a literal, clinical idiot or am I trippin? (￣∇￣")
about question
I'm curious.
What would YOU reply to a person who said something that's based on misinformation or hearsay and supposed personal expertise~. You then correct that person with FACTUAL evidence. Yet they still keep arguing their version of reality (or delusion, tbh).
CONTEXT:
(This is about art. A supposed part of the art was planned after a mistake was made, yet in an interview you can hear them talking about planning out the exact scene as is in the final. Even a staff working on the artwork has confirmed that fact.)
What would YOUR response be after previously staying nice and calm and factual?
Anything goes; meme posts, reply pics, serious answers, etc.. I'm just bored af, so gimme anything you got.
What would YOU reply to a person who said something that's based on misinformation or hearsay and supposed personal expertise~. You then correct that person with FACTUAL evidence. Yet they still keep arguing their version of reality (or delusion, tbh).
CONTEXT:
(This is about art. A supposed part of the art was planned after a mistake was made, yet in an interview you can hear them talking about planning out the exact scene as is in the final. Even a staff working on the artwork has confirmed that fact.)
What would YOUR response be after previously staying nice and calm and factual?
Anything goes; meme posts, reply pics, serious answers, etc.. I'm just bored af, so gimme anything you got.