A2Z's question (5)

the drama, the beef, the memes, the discourse, the (horny) shitposting, the politics and the online jumpings were mad hilarious lmao That shit was more entertaining than the damn manga/manhwa. Users rly be dedicating entire threads to shit talk other members especially cestelle. Those were the days time rly flies huh

i don't think so tbh

Heh.... my ability allows my coochie to predict your every move... You have no chance of defeating me... No one has beaten my domain expansion...

*gets piped down by toji*

MY lord and savior daddy sukana is better anyway. The mangaka doesn't even like gojo's bitch ass LMAO

Also hot take the female characters in jjk are not groundbreaking. They're just not sexualised.

y'all are fr annoying af. I've yet to see readers of straight romance or GL go on other genres and say shit like "ThIs Is WhY i OnLy ReAd Bl!!111" as if BL is this perfectly written genre with zero flaws. Here's a hot take - a lot of BL's are bootleg straight romances and are written the exact same as the straight stories y'all hate so much but y'all like it bc it's ~gay~. The male MC is almost always coded to be submissive and meek and the 'bottom' while the love interest is dominant taller muscular and the 'top'. Ironically, BL enforces gender roles more than straight romance does. You could replace the male MC w/ a FL and nothing would change. Ofc there are exceptions to the rule but they're exceptions for a reason.

Another thing, BL is not empowering for women. Istg y'all will call w/e a woman does empowering w/o thinking critically. How tf is a woman writing about gay relationships between men empowering? How can a genre where the women are either a) non-existent or are side characters at best b) exist only to get in between the m/m relationship empowering? It's giving internalised misogyny. Instead of writing better-written female characters (who are in charge of their sexuality) write about gay men instead. Makes perfect sense /s