WELL. IF THAT PERSON IS A PEDO GROOMER TROLL ON TIKTOK AND MANGAGO WHO ALSO SEEK CHILDREN AND SLIDE IN PEOPLE'S DM OR LITERALLY USE THE FORUMS TO SEXUALLY GROOM CHILDREN WHO USE THIS WEBSITE BY POSTING VULGAR POSTS AS AN OUTLET TO SHOW THEIR PERVERSIONS ONLINE BUT CONDEMN NORMAL PEOPLE WHO ONLY WANT TO READ MANGA IN PEACE, OR TIK TOK CHILD MURDERERS WHO POST THE AFTERMATH OF KILLING THEIR OWN PARENTS. I DON'T BLAME OTHERS WHO WANT TO BULLY THE CRIMINALS ONLINE. THAT ONE TEENAGE BOY WHO MURDERED ANOTHER BOY SAID HE'LL RETURN HOME ANYWAY (HE SAID IT SO CALLOUSLY AS IF THE PUBLIC WILL ALL BE FORGET HIS CRIMES BECAUSE HE'S A MINOR) AND SAID IT PROUDLY AS THE VICTIM'S MOTHER CAN BE HEARD WAILING PAINFULLY IN THE BACKGROUND. THE JUDGE SAID HE'S VERY TEMPTED TO PUT THE BOY IN JUVIE AND LET HIM BE TRIED AS AN ADULT FOR NOT SHOWING ANY REMORSE. CAN YOU BLAME THE PEOPLE WHO POST ABOUT THIS CRIMINAL BOY ONLINE TO RAISE AWARENESS AND ASK FOR JUSTICE?
BUT IF IT'S A NORMAL PERSON, IT'S WRONG TO BULLY THEM. IT'S ONLY OK TO DO THAT TO CRIMINALS WHO ARE PROVEN TO BE CRIMINALS.
I honestly didn't expect anyone finding this old post (3 years ago), but I understand. It could be, to some extent, acceptable if someone is already an horrendous person. "Problematic" people could range to someone who has horrendous takes or an actual criminal. If it's the former, then it would not be the wise choice to constantly harass them. But criminals should be condemned by the court and the mass media no matter what. (Also why are you typing in all caps, it caught me off guard a bit lmao).
Messages
WELL. IF THAT PERSON IS A PEDO GROOMER TROLL ON TIKTOK AND MANGAGO WHO ALSO SEEK CHILDREN AND SLIDE IN PEOPLE'S DM OR LITERALLY USE THE FORUMS TO SEXUALLY GROOM CHILDREN WHO USE THIS WEBSITE BY POSTING VULGAR POSTS AS AN OUTLET TO SHOW THEIR PERVERSIONS ONLINE BUT CONDEMN NORMAL PEOPLE WHO ONLY WANT TO READ MANGA IN PEACE, OR TIK TOK CHILD MURDERERS WHO POST THE AFTERMATH OF KILLING THEIR OWN PARENTS. I DON'T BLAME OTHERS WHO WANT TO BULLY THE CRIMINALS ONLINE. THAT ONE TEENAGE BOY WHO MURDERED ANOTHER BOY SAID HE'LL RETURN HOME ANYWAY (HE SAID IT SO CALLOUSLY AS IF THE PUBLIC WILL ALL BE FORGET HIS CRIMES BECAUSE HE'S A MINOR) AND SAID IT PROUDLY AS THE VICTIM'S MOTHER CAN BE HEARD WAILING PAINFULLY IN THE BACKGROUND. THE JUDGE SAID HE'S VERY TEMPTED TO PUT THE BOY IN JUVIE AND LET HIM BE TRIED AS AN ADULT FOR NOT SHOWING ANY REMORSE. CAN YOU BLAME THE PEOPLE WHO POST ABOUT THIS CRIMINAL BOY ONLINE TO RAISE AWARENESS AND ASK FOR JUSTICE?
BUT IF IT'S A NORMAL PERSON, IT'S WRONG TO BULLY THEM. IT'S ONLY OK TO DO THAT TO CRIMINALS WHO ARE PROVEN TO BE CRIMINALS.
I honestly didn't expect anyone finding this old post (3 years ago), but I understand. It could be, to some extent, acceptable if someone is already an horrendous person. "Problematic" people could range to someone who has horrendous takes or an actual criminal. If it's the former, then it would not be the wise choice to constantly harass them. But criminals should be condemned by the court and the mass media no matter what. (Also why are you typing in all caps, it caught me off guard a bit lmao).
It’s legitimately just stalking, and it’s creepy af. Don’t do this yall
If anyone here actually do this type of shit,get a life and stop stalking people you weird ass bitch.
its literally just stalking, pretty sure you could go to jail, and get sued for this
That's right, five years in prison and life sentence if the cyberstalking caused someone's death.
thats cancel culture for you