Lmao what. This is so vague...
“Only 5% are omega[s], hence the 32, but there are more than 32 [in the replies of the said post???]”
And your conclusion doesn’t make sense,
isn’t it more reasonable to conclude that there is an increase in omegas and a decline in betas?? A ‘need for betas’ just sounds wrong... and while you’re at it, ......
reply
