data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51357/51357476d123fedacb2fab5c57022cdfc757c855" alt=""
When a person is drunk they are not in the right mind and it isn’t possible for them to give consent. If this wasn’t the love interest and if they were “ugly” or smth you would say “get your hands off my baby”. The people calling the people saying this is non-consensual, baby’s and stupid are stupid themselves for being ignorant and thinking rape is just someone screaming out no during sex. I don’t really mind yaoi but some of these glorify rape and unhealthy relationships.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab565/ab56596df3efe4dab0e434a6824452659daad133" alt=""
First off, if they leads were ugly no one would be reading this. That's just bad art.
Also pretty elistest of you to say that being a legally aged consenting adult wanting to have drunk sex is an unhealthy relationship. I'm guessing it's because you're either not legal age, or are still in your hand-holding phase.
Lunacy like this is why real rape is not taken seriously. This is not rape, and you are either mentally or physically a child.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51357/51357476d123fedacb2fab5c57022cdfc757c855" alt=""
First off, a character being ugly doesn’t mean it’s bad art. Second of all when did anyone in this say they wanted drunk sex, matter of fact in the gray hair guy eyes the purple hair guy is avoiding him so he would probably assume the purple hair guy doesn’t wanna have sex and wait for him to sober up so they can talk. And how is “real rape” not taken seriously when people are more strict with what is consensual sex.
Btw, not a child and even so that shouldn’t invalidate my argument. :)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab565/ab56596df3efe4dab0e434a6824452659daad133" alt=""
Ha right. There's tons of yaoi with ugly male leads. They're super popular.
The guy literally told his friend he was going to a bar to find a new partner because he was sexually frustrated. 100 percent intentional. I don't understand the rest of that point.
Real rape is notoriously not taken seriously in most legal situations from both a media and legal standpoint. This is well documented and the reason for major movements to change that. I have no idea what you mean with "more strict with what is consensual".
Being an inexperienced child absolutely does invalidate arguments on adult situations. The only ones who don't understand that are children.
Regardless, in the eyes of the law, being drunk does not invalidate your ability to give consent, regardless or your personal opinion.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51357/51357476d123fedacb2fab5c57022cdfc757c855" alt=""
I do agree I was wrong with the statement about age effecting someone’s argument, but i do stand by my other points. I would also like to point out in my state it is illegal to have sex with someone who is incapacitated. The reason why i felt it necessary to make my first comment is when incapacitated sex is in media and the ending is happy it leads to real life situations being romanticized. Imagine if a girl and a guy had sex and the girl tried to run away and since that doesn’t work she trys to avoid the man and he doesn’t know why. When the man sees her go into the club he follows her and doesn’t allow her to get with other men and takes her to his place since she’s drunk even though he has a number of a close friend of hers. At his place she’s so drunk she begs him to and sex with her, which the man complies. It looks as if the girl is giving consent but she is clearly incapacitated and not in her right mind, the man who isn’t drunk should be able to see that and reject her. This is how i see the situation between the two main leads and that’s why it feels so wrong to me, where a situation like this could be considered ok in real life.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab565/ab56596df3efe4dab0e434a6824452659daad133" alt=""
This is an oddly specific scenario that is still not rape. I don't think you understand the legal definition of incapacitated because it doesn't fit here. Mental incapacity refers to the inability to make rational decisions due to mental illness or impairment, not intoxication. Intoxication is not a defense.
If you mean physically incapacitated, then obviously rape, but this is not what you've detailed in this scenario. What you have written here is morally ambiguous at best, but is 100 percent not rape in any state.
Ahhh Raphael the flower shop guy is so cute!!!!!