
I'm sorry the teach is PMO so bad, bro you're deaduzz in a zombie apocalypse wdym ur nawt priotizing the ones who endangered themselves for the whole village supplies, i hate righteous character in the wrong place

everyone in that village aims nothing but to survive, and so what the old man wanted for his son when he stole the medicines, as stated that his son was sick and was at the verge of dying, if the medicine is for the people in the Village, why did the old man felt the need to steal?
What's so wrong of the MC being against it? How is an old man stealing medicine (which is for the 'village') in hopes to save his dying and sickly son is such a despicable act—enough to lead death penalty? That's literally fucked?? That's the same thing as imprisoning a homeless, in deepshit poverty old man stealing a loaf of bread just to eat
You call me righteous? Bitch you're fucking weird

It's not all sunshine and rainbows SYBAU, It is for the village but the child contributes nothing at the village atm, For sure yeah the future he's going to be a asset.
But the scalpers risking their lives and they're using limited medicine on a kid?(which the kid needed), so prioritising the kid over the scalpers is a bad idea without scalpers the village would lose resources like food and would ruin the WHOLE village lives.
and YES the Mc is wrong for standing up for the guy he's inconsiderate of the people in the past who didn't get medicine, and the survivability of the WHOLE village incase scalpers needed the medicine, the MC has just woke up and don't know the situation outside he's naive oblivious, yet he's slapping for his own morality?
Bro use your critical thinking, you are righteous, The dad is exempted in the rules (keeping the village survival) just because just his son sick? He got death penalty for endangering the whole village u stupid fuck

You talk about critical thinking like you’ve ever used it. "The kid contributes nothing" he’s a child, not a soldier . Survival isn't just about brute utility, it's about preserving humanity. Otherwise, what are you even fighting to protect? A village full of resources and no soul?
The MC is ‘naive’ for having compassion?? but you’re out here rooting for public executions like it’s a sport. You think slapping morality is worse than endorsing the death of a man trying to save his son? That’s not logic, that’s just cold-blooded delusion dressed up as pragmatism.
You’re not defending the village. You’re just desensitized enough to call murder ‘efficiency.’ But hey, congrats on finally finding a hill to die on, it just happens to be a pile of corpses. You fucking stink

You’re saying I’m the ‘weird one’ for bringing morality into an apocalypse, but that’s exactly WHEN morality matters most. If survival means throwing away all ethics, then congrats, you’re just surviving to become an evil bitch. What’s the point of keeping a society alive if you’re gonna strip it of all humanity along the way?????
And don’t act brand new if you can understand empathy in a functioning society, then why toss it out the window the moment things get hard? That’s not realism, that’s cowardice hiding behind ‘pragmatism', it's so fucking hypocritical
If your idea of survival means watching a man die for saving his son and calling it ‘logicañ' when he gets executed, then maybe you’re the one who doesn’t belong in a society, apocalypse or not.

Holy cornball, i understand your perspective on this and don't wanna set it aside for my points, but don't set aside mine.
"he’s a child, not a soldier . Survival isn't just about brute utility, it's about preserving humanity." The more the reasons soldiers should get the medicine for preservation of humanity. (It's like the trolley problem stylized ethical dilemmas we're on other side of the coin)
MC compassion is biased coming from someone who just woke up from a coma from a functioning society, not knowing what comes before the village progression on why are those rules are created.
I'll literally be on pile corpse while you'll be on a mountain on it for disregarding rules for survivability of the village, your empathy will be the life and death of you.

I May have ASPD but also have cognitive empathy, Ethics are a social construct, if the old society is gone a new one will be formed in the apocalypse.
Because it is tossed out when things get hard, idk if you're sheltered or what but people will throw out their ethics, survival, swallow their pride and beliefs for their survival. Apocalypse or not.
"Evil Bitch" is rich for someone risking the jeopardy of the lives of the WHOLE village for father/son yes it's sad, but is realistic.
Again, I'm not justifying their actions it is simple pragmatism, the father knowing the rules and consequences well committed to it and died.
If your ideal survival means helping each other out with their strengths and weaknesses, having empathy and understanding with each other, well... you need to wake up

You really think sounding like a budget philosophy professor makes up for your ass fascist vibez
Brro said ‘trolley problem’ like they cracked a first-year ethics class, but forgot this ain’t a classroom, it’s literal human lives. You’re arguing rules over reason, as if every law made in fear is automatically righteous??? I mean Newsflash dawg, desperate societies make desperate rules, that doesn’t make them holy
You act like empathy is a weakness, but it’s the only thing keeping survival from turning into literal savagery. You’d be proud to rot on a pile of corpses as long as it follows protocol, the rules??? That’s not noble—that’s blind obedience cosplaying as logic which is actually fucking funny
The MC might be fresh out the coma, but at least he hasn’t gone numb to what matters. You call it biased?? I call it hard, If your worldview can’t handle compassion without crumbling, maybe it was never that strong to begin with

Oh you really pulled the “ethics are a social construct” card while name-dropping ASPD like it’s a flex
Like Ah yes, ‘ethics are a social construct’cool story, Nietzsche You sound like a walking Reddit thread trying to justify being heartless. AND Having ASPD doesn’t make your argument edgy, it just means you’re admitting you lack th core wiring for empathy, and still somehow think you're the authority on survival? Dawg??
You say people throw away morals when things get hard, but guess what? The people worth surviving with are the ones who literally DONT. Otherwise you’re just recreating hell with different costumes. If the ‘new society’ you're dreaming of means executing dads for saving their kids, count me the hell out
You call risking medicine for a kid a threat to the village nah. What really kills communities is the mindset that compassion IS weakness. Rules exist to guide us, not to ground us to inhumanity. The moment you start killing people for breaking them, you've stopped surviving and started regressing like?
So keep yelling ‘realism’ while romanticizing death cult logi bullshut. Dawd I’ll take flawed compassion over cold-blooded killings ANYDAY. Wake up? Bro, I’m awake???you’re just sleepwalking through a nightmare and calling it strategy like your so fucking edgy, because you're not
If you want to put this in a perspective? Think about what the fuck the child would do to survive now that his wn father is 6ft underground for what? For CARING for his son bro be for fucking real

Lmao I didn't realized i could talk shit with how you're talking with your ass, might as well put your ass in a sharine oh all loving good empathetic goodness gracious, can't even look shit in the shoes of other people always gotta be the victim.
Whatever i say won't go through ur head anyway or look it at my way always gotta yap abt things i didn't say to make your point valid and mine all wrong it's not always right and wrong.
Bro can't even comprehend analogy like a trolley problem you're literally contradicting yourself "desperate societies make desperate rules"They're desperate enough to execute the father for the rules what is it that you don't understand?
I'm not sure if i should agree with you since you're fighting air, I'm not saying it makes them holy goodie good it's desperate times call for desperate measure
You keep targeting points i don't make and avoiding the the most i stand up the most for a empathetic person you're surely a hateful one, Just put the feelings in the bag bro.
Rules are created for a reason, it's not all sunshine and rainbows mr/ms goodie two-shoes, Objective Morality>> Subjective Morality, stop stuffing words in my mouth compassion is not a weakness it is RISK.

"admitting you lack th core wiring for empathy"
YES, That's why we're debating, because i can't understand your empathy I'm trying as too WHY and WHERE, I'm trying to learn your empathy.
"You call risking medicine for a kid a threat to the village nah. What really kills communities is the mindset that compassion IS weakness."
- Like What you just justified it, HOW it's not with the words u hate "Realistic/Logical" How will that work? Will the village get resources if the kid is saved? Will the scalpers

Will the scalpers will just be healed with magical power of friendship with the sick boy?,
I don't understand how will one sick boy outweigh the whole village, is 1 sick boy enough justified to give medicine because you feel bad for it? Give me Objective reasoning as to why?
Calling it edgy is weak do better,
"Allat yap for you to reason the apocalypse "
Then you go
"everyone is literally just trying to survive"
Please make up your mind

Damn, that’s a lot of yap for ‘I’m mad you disagreed with me and understood my argument better than I did.’ You keep swinging between ‘I’m not justifying it’??? and then fully justifying it with ‘desperate times’ like that magically erases human cost, and you tell me I'm contradicting?? Hellaur??
You toss out ‘objective morality’ like it’s some cheat ass code, but all you’re doing is clinging to rules as if they’re UNTOUCHABLE commandments . Rules built from fear aren’t SACRED DAWG they’re just fear but in shit writing. And let’s be real: your whole trolley problem analogy flopped the very MOEMNT you acted like empathy is some naive luxury instead of a survival strategy rooted in community strength
You say I avoid your points?? Dawg no, I’m dismantling them for YOU. If your logic ends with a child dying to keep a rulebook intact,your ‘objective morality’ is just cruelty in a fancy hat. Compassion ISa risk, but thenso is apathy?? The difference is, one leads to people fighting for each other. The other turns villages into execution pits, because what? They're WORTH MORE? What exactly is that??
So you can keep projecting and calling it philosophy, but at the end of the day, you’re just mad someone dared to humanize survival. And if that bothers you, maybe it’s not me who needs to put feelings in a bag i’s you who forgot where you left your humanity, big EW

This is actually mad frustrating af, you keep flip-flopping between ‘I’m just trying to understand empathy’ and straight up calling it naive and dangerous?? Which is it? Don’t gaslight me dawg
You say I justified risking medicine for a kid? No. I said a community that protects ALL its people, and Thst includes the vulnerable. That doesn’t mean throwing resources around blindly, It means recognizing that survival is more than just numbers; it’s about building a future worth surviving. Like that's really it, there's no need for bat shit crazy like public execution, because at the end of the day it's not like he's domes such an evil act??? If the village is meant to protect, why is it's resources being withheld from it's PPL? Such as the dad here??
You want to talk logistics? Fine. Saving a child may not bring INSTANT food or resources, but neither does creating fear by publicly killing a man who broke a rule out of love and care for his own fucking child. That kind of leadership breeds silence, resentment, and even it's collapse. Communities thrive when people believe they’re worth protecting, not just when they’re ‘useful'. And that's why you sound absolutely batshit crazy for what you have uttered these past replies.
So don’t twist my words like I’m saying emotion > logic, because what iam saying is logic without empathy isn’t strength, itss cruelty. And if you ACTUALLY wanted to understand that, maybe try listening instead of calling names. Stop acting as if viewing the world in such a way would save you.

Listen here
You keep demanding "objective reasoning" like survival is some math equation shit, but you're missing the bigger picture, people don't fight for cold rules,they fight for each other. No, the sick boy doesn't magically save the scalpers like some fucking god wizard with healing and creation powers, but killing a man for trying to save his kid sends a message that rules matter more than people, and that destroys trust, morale, and the will to protect ANYONE, that’s not pragmatism anymore, itds rot disguised as order.
If you really think a child has to earn the right to live by being useful, then you’re not talking about survival anymore, you’re talking about dehumanization. And if your version of a functioning village needs to sacrifice compassion to stay alive, maybe it doesn’t deserve to survive in the first place.
And you know what, that speaks a lot about who you are. Seriously.
Wow such a gold find, no romance? Morally grey character? Femboy? SOLDDD