
And for the rape-screamers:
She was in a body that was full of aphrodisiac.
She didn't know he had a bone paralyzer issue.
He didn't tell her he had a bone paralyzer issue and couildn't fight back.
Not fighting back was seen as consent from her POV.
So, it's a big misunderstanding from both perspectives, as he didn't know she was drugged and possessed by a demoness.

Look, idm people who like to read rape. It's a fantasy. But anyways, let's get this straight. There was no consent. Not fighting back isn't a yes. She took it as yes but she shouldn't have therefore she raped him. Same case if a man did this to a woman. There are many reasons why someone doesn't fight back or say anything so it is should always be 'no consent' by default.
I don't like the way they deal with the rape here so I dropped it. If you don't mind then sure, keep reading. But yes, this is undeniably rape.

Yep it is considered a 'no' now but just because the moral standards back then were different doesn't make it okay. Just because something was accepted back then like slavery doesn't mean we can shrug our shoulders and say well those slave owners can't be blamed because that was the 'trend' back then. So no this isn't okay therefore I don't like the character. That's all. And I also don't like the author because this story portrays rape as simply being a positive part of the 'strong' attitude. Just my opinion.

For the record, all these historical stories are full of "morally grey" and counter-modern ethics behavior. Or are all those slaves, maids used and abused, forced marriages, men with dozens of concubines, rich oppressing poor...all that doesn't make you outraged? Only, well, rape?
Cause one of the most painful things fo rme is seeing servants beaten, whipped, threatened, bought, sold, drowned.....it's like they have no rights at all. That bothers me a helluva lot more than a rich, powerful man being treated by a woman the way men have treated women--like sexual commodities.

I completely agree there are so many other issues and they are probably bigger problems than the rape. However, please don't think that it is okay for women to rape men now because there has been and still are many men who rape women. But, rape the rapist? I support. Don't group innocent people with the guilty.

The shithead tries TWICE to ruin/kill his wife and all he gets is fired and banned from working? He's not in prison? He's not executed? What is this shit????? That's not justice.

I guess In this timeline. He’ll be a outcast. No one would be able to help him. He’ll be a lonely poor old man with no one Insight. There’s in massive chance that In reality he’ll commit suicide with shame on his name. He has no way of earning a live and no one would hire him. His family would probably kick him out also.
I came to read the update.
I left without reading.
I don't think I can take more of this effed up-ness right now.....
Maybe later.
Sob.
Same I'm just dropping