OpiSin's Topics (619)

As he mentioned that the princess is still a little kid, she is probably the bride to be for his little brother, who gets introduced directly afterward ...

Since adult, mature and smut is not tagged

Going by history (it's increasingly feeling like our dear author has researched the French Revolution) actually when you attempt to squash public discontent with violence, yes it may calm down for a bit.

However, the anger will remain and resentment at the violence usually will lead to riots... Then if you can get the military or police on side? Or have enough weapons
yourself.... (￣▽￣)

But revolutions are incredibly messy, deadly and peace takes a long time to cement. Not to say it isn't worth it in the end, but during #－.－)

Yes you are the only one. The terrorists are bombing the commoners, who despite knowing the dangers came out to protest not the nobles who did them wrong. They have this idea that if they bomb where a crowd of people (commoners) then the nobles would pay attention but they were ignored because in the first place they were ignored because they were commoners. If you don’t undresyand then idk whats wrong w u

Are you sorry for Hamas? They also have legitimate reason to do what they did ( resistance fighters in the biggest open jail). Polish hero Piłsudski was also involved in terrorism at one point so do Bandera, Israeli Jews before Israel was created and others. As someone said "Terrorism is a weapon of the weak people" but the biggest problem is that it's victims are most of the time random people who have nothing to do with cause that terrorist fighting against and only grow opposition against them ( so they are call terrorist s not resistance or freedom fighters). Many times in history for one side people named as terrorists became resistance fighters and heroes in eyes of others.

Yass free Palestine, viva la revolution

The so-called terrorists are just commoners that have been pushed too far and are desperate for change. Desperation can lead many to do things they wouldn't otherwise do.

I'll stick with historical cases, we often now view resistance fighters as those who were pushed into violence due to being repeatedly silenced and seeing no other option. If a person doesn't have hope, they have very little to lose.

History will likely be a better judge of resistance, than those who are in power and enabling oppression today.

I dont sympathize with them coz their anger is putting innocent peoples lives on harms way. If the cause is one particular noble and seekinh revenge on them then im all for it, but they decided to blame it on random nobles who had nothing to do with it as well as harm their own fellow opressed people. If you noticed in jail that person who helped fl says that those bombers didnt even care for the common people who was present there. That is what is wrong. Because then they are no different from the bad noble they're fighting against.

Yeah sure i guess killing their own people is one of those things

Unfortunately, no revolution doesn't have casualties.

yes it was explained a few chapters back but i cant remember the reason well though, i think he gave all his time and effort to his people and after his mother died his obsession with doing everything for his Kingdom grew so he became more like a machine than a human.

After his mother death he was obsessed to do everything perfectly, he overworked himself even thought the prople around him said he should rest, he baerly eat and sleep, at last he collapsed and fallen ill. After then he gave up the CPs position.

Thank you both!