beta
I read the raws and reread all the English chapters... And in the beginning teasers, Hari grabbed Gale's gun and pointed it at herself. She said "Do what you have to do." We all know Gale and his team's main job isn't to protect Hari but to kill those behind Mr. Ahn's parents deaths.
And...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
From the raws and flashbacks, Hari was a really loyal and devout follower. She screwed a lot of 'traitors' of the chosen one. She snitched on people, assisted in manhunts, and helped the church punish the 'traitors'.
And I'm guessing she shot Mr. Ahn in the past hence why he has a bullet scar on his side. Maybe in one of the boxes of Hari's locked memories, she was responsible for Mr. Ahn's trauma. I don't think Mr. Ahn could forgive that if he knew. Hence why the whole Gale pointing his gun at her. If Hari did something bad enough to have Mr. Ahn send Gale after her, then I think their relationship is basically dead.
spoiler
I saw in the raws mr Ahn threw away her gift in the trash with a very disgusted look. that was my first clue he isn't what he represents himself to be to Hari.
omfg
As horrific as it is... Gale was always my favorite so I'm fine with this
Why not kill the king? Like if I was one of the princes, after seeing him murder my mother, I would just off him. Because why play his stupid succession game? If it was me, I would've just had a secret meeting with the rest of the Royal children and been like I'll drop out of the succession race but let's kill the king. Idgaf who becomes king but that man's gotta go.
Maybe there's a reason why they didn't kill him so I'll withhold my judgement.
If the king is gone, then the princes would fight for the throne too; just like the king who killed his two brothers. Hence, the history will repeat itself.
Of course, by law, the first son will ascend to the throne, but there was no law that the other sons should not or could not fight for the said throne.
In that brutal lineage, dropping out of succession is dropping your royalty.
No money, no house, no land— just a plain old commoner who cannot be a noble unless they join the knighthood. Plus, judging the way the princes and princesses are raised, I don't think they have a good bond to even join hands, or even care much for their mother. (It's normal to have a wet maid that breastfeed the young noble/royal bc it was deemed unladylike and commoner act o breast feed your baby.)
So I guess it's clear why they didn't join hands and fight against the king.
___
I have no hostility towards you, jus trying to explain why I know of and why I think that way won't be suitable for their situation.