Taurine want to read (All 0)

Taurine is reading (All 0)

Taurine already read (All 0)

Taurine's Album ( All 0 )

Taurine's List ( All 0 )

Taurine's topics ( All 54 )

Taurine May 27, 2025 7:14 pm

Yall what are we even comparing here. Seo-in is a serial rapist and sexual offender. It’s a fact. He is criminal. No sob back story is gonna change it.
Taegu didn’t do anything at this point. Beside showing up and getting too invested in MC’s life. Also you clearly have no idea what grooming is. We didn’t see one scene that would indicate grooming. Groomers don’t wait 10 years after someone became legal adult to „seduce them”. I’m not a fan of such dynamic at all but Taegu starting to have feelings, for someone he used to know in the past and helped in some way, once that person turned adult (we didn’t see one scene proving otherwise) is definitely less „creepy and abnormal” than federal offence which is rape. Or maybe thoughts are bigger crime than literal rape now? Thoughtcrime…. Orwell is definitely laughing from his grave.
And I don’t even ship MC with any of them.

    Mafu May 27, 2025 7:33 pm

    Yeah well it is grooming and thats not better than a rapist. Don’t even try to compare the two because both of them are the worst and nothing changes that. People who read these kinds of manhwas know what they are reading and are willing to neglect their moral compass. Honestly at the end of day it doesn’t matter. It’s genuinely up to you.

    Taurine May 27, 2025 7:35 pm
    Yeah well it is grooming and thats not better than a rapist. Don’t even try to compare the two because both of them are the worst and nothing changes that. People who read these kinds of manhwas know what the... Mafu

    Enlighten us how it’s grooming :) because we didn’t see ONE scene indicating Taegu trying to seduce, brainwash MC since his teen years. So explain

    Taurine May 27, 2025 7:40 pm
    Yeah well it is grooming and thats not better than a rapist. Don’t even try to compare the two because both of them are the worst and nothing changes that. People who read these kinds of manhwas know what the... Mafu

    Like I genuinely can’t with yall. You put equal sign between things we’ve literally seen in this story, literal actions and some made up sceneries which FOR NOW have absolute no proof in the story

    Mafu May 27, 2025 8:09 pm
    Like I genuinely can’t with yall. You put equal sign between things we’ve literally seen in this story, literal actions and some made up sceneries which FOR NOW have absolute no proof in the story Taurine

    It’s funny how it’s the same person with this ohh this is not grooming blah blah blah plus ur repeating ur words and most of it don’t even make sense lmao.
    I’ll break it down for you.
    So, according to google grooming is “the action of attempting to form a relationship with a child or young person, with the intention of sexually assaulting them or inducing them to commit an illegal act such as selling drugs or joining a terrorist organization.”
    As we know from the story, the ahjussi met the mc when he was in middle school. When he was a child. And no it was not indicated that he wanted to form a sexual relationship with a child,no.
    The way the story has been developing, there have been multiple signs that the uncle MIGHT have ulterior motives. The way he is overprotective over the mc and in the recent chapter where he held on to him?? Plus the literal cover of the manhwa has a hand brushing on the mcs face implying it coukd be the uncle since there’s not another third party that's been introduced till now.
    Not just that, a lot of people HAVE pointed out what’s wrong and if you don’t agree with that, That’s fine, just don’t force your opinions on others.

    YoaiLover May 27, 2025 11:19 pm
    It’s funny how it’s the same person with this ohh this is not grooming blah blah blah plus ur repeating ur words and most of it don’t even make sense lmao. I’ll break it down for you. So, according to ... Mafu

    If there’s no implications of him being a groomer, then you really can’t say he’s a groomer until it’s actually proved that he is like OK. You don’t have to like the relationship because I sure don’t but calling him a groomer when there’s no proof that he is, it’s just wrong of itself.

    Mafu May 28, 2025 4:05 am
    If there’s no implications of him being a groomer, then you really can’t say he’s a groomer until it’s actually proved that he is like OK. You don’t have to like the relationship because I sure don’... YoaiLover

    It’s clear you haven’t read the entire comment. I said if the story progresses in that direction, it’s grooming. Please don’t jump to the gun before reading the entire thing.

    Taurine May 28, 2025 11:42 am
    It’s funny how it’s the same person with this ohh this is not grooming blah blah blah plus ur repeating ur words and most of it don’t even make sense lmao. I’ll break it down for you. So, according to ... Mafu

    Omfg you still don’t get it. I already said the story MAY go in such direction but FOR NOW there was not even one panel that shows that Taegu had lusted after MC when he was a kid and had ulterior motives and tired to brainwash MC since he was a kid. I can’t with you.
    Bravo I know the definition. You clearly on the other hand didn’t so now you add things how he might be a groomer because there is absolute no proof for now in the story.

    Taurine May 28, 2025 11:43 am
    If there’s no implications of him being a groomer, then you really can’t say he’s a groomer until it’s actually proved that he is like OK. You don’t have to like the relationship because I sure don’... YoaiLover

    It’s pointless talking with that person. Bravo you’ve got the point

Taurine April 9, 2025 8:26 am

I seriously can’t with people who see bigger problem with Taegu who never acted (as far as we know) improperly towards Yeongwoon, didn’t even hit on him as far as we know now when MC is a whole ass adult in his mid 20s than with Seo-In who is classified harmful rapist.
And don’t even start with trauma excuse

    lilmoonv_ April 9, 2025 8:37 am

    That's wott I was thinking about like what are y'all even yapping about

    ghost April 9, 2025 9:24 am

    Right right, they tryna ruin it.

    æbi April 9, 2025 9:51 am

    seoin isn’t a rapist tf is y’all on about whenever they had sex it was consensual

    Mineultra April 9, 2025 10:01 am
    seoin isn’t a rapist tf is y’all on about whenever they had sex it was consensual æbi

    No some was non consensual. You should reread this

    BiBye April 9, 2025 2:15 pm

    This!! lol

    æbi April 9, 2025 3:26 pm
    No some was non consensual. You should reread this Mineultra

    calling him a rapist is an exaggeration imo

    Taurine April 9, 2025 3:35 pm
    calling him a rapist is an exaggeration imo æbi

    Um no. Rape has very clear definition. You understand you can always take consent off in the middle of sex yeah? When you say no and your partner continues it’s rape. Most of their sex scenes were forceful, without any consent given, fighting the other off or even with open signalised wish to stop.

    Bunny April 9, 2025 5:52 pm
    seoin isn’t a rapist tf is y’all on about whenever they had sex it was consensual æbi

    Sure it have STARTED consensually but it didn't end that way. Yeon begged him to pull out and stop because it hurt so bad when they did it the first time. Hell he even pushed him away and tried to ESCAPE, which is a very clear retraction of consent. Seo-in didn't want to stop, dragged him back, and kept having sex despite Yeon's objections. Clearly RAPE.

    Sure the second time they had sex wasn't as violent but even then it's dubious at best. Yeon always expresses discomfort, asks to slow down and such but Seo-in never listens. The only time we see Yeon actively consent and engage in the sex is in towards the end when he wraps his legs around Seo-in and clings to him in chapter 30 or 31.

Taurine's questions ( All 0 )

Taurine's message board ( All 0 )

Taurine follow ( All 0 )

> 6 people followed Taurine