Sir Mugo is indeed benevolent. But when it comes to Jerk Mugo and The Beast... The roles seem a bit switched. I would say the 2nd personality is the dangerously savage one, while the 3rd as in The Beast (the childish one) is the dubious one. (╥﹏╥)
I don't think sir mugo is benevolent. When you see the uke think of the 3 personalities it's a blank face, he hadn met the 3, sir mugo then jerk mugo.
Sir mugo is willing to sacrifice a random omega, he just doesn't what it to be the one he's attached to. The beast is more like a hungry animal. Is a bear morally grey because it has to eat a deer to survive?
I think it would be an awesome twist if it were revealed sir mugo was the dubious one, because the jerk is clearly actively cruel, and set up the sacrifice to tame the beast and the book was written by a sacrifice who survived or something.
I think he has this speech problem and childish behaviour because he's acting more like the animal he's supposed to be than the others. Or Idk, just trying to make excuses, cause I don't want to think of this one as a "child". Nuh-huh. Or maybe... He was the last personality to appear thus the Jerk Mugo called him "child". Either way, seen this kind of thing occur in some movies about split personalities