I want to see how Ruby is doing after Aquas death (┬┬﹏┬┬)
the whole clown costume wouldn't be enough for that "I mistook you for someone else in my sleep"
Right like who you mistake boyfriend for. And everybody in a comment talking about how this guy is such a bad guy if he were such a bad guy he would’ve been doing some shit while this man was asleep.
eh i hoped that our fl will be a full grown up after that 5 years
Well she is 10 yes old now, not much to expect tbh
10 is still a kid
What? Just 5 years and you expected a full grown woman?
she's 10 years old bru, still a kid but maybe she's too smol for.her age but that does not matter
Bro…do you have a brain? Of course she’s not gonna be adult after only 5 years smh ┑(￣Д ￣)┍
author couldn't place that question in better situation (╯°Д °)╯╧╧
why people are lying to themselves saying is isn't yaoi and argument it with "mc and ml are having sex" like this is the whole definition of yaoi lmao
that’s definitely not what yaoi is so let me stop you right there. Yaoi is simply “boys love”, or “EXPLICIT boys love” to be more specific if you wanted to differentiate between yaoi and shonen ai. Thissss manwha in question could not be farther from ”boys love”. There is no “ML” and “MC”. There are two MCs, who are equally sick in the head and they have engaged sexually. I would even argue that most occasions, were not them having sex, but rape. Or if it was consensual, it was dubious enough for there to be nothing close to romance, sweet love or affection.
Do yourself a favor and research stockholm syndrome. Because no matter how many times people say this manhwa depicts it, y’all seem to not have any understanding of what it is and why them having sex does not mean it’s a love story.
If you cannot comprehend that much, it’s time to get off the internet and stop reading BLs, because clearly you’re someone who’s so unhealthy obsessed with gay media that you can’t distinguish a reality and fiction, probably fetishize people in real life
You're so confidently incorrect that it's comedic lol
You've yet to say anything remotely coherent beyond bragging about your fetishization, yet you claim I’m incorrect? The only thing comedic here is your staggering ignorance and stupidity
Girl. Be serious. You don't even know what you're talking about despite seeming so sure of yourself. You're a fool. You have no ground to stand on calling other people ignorant or stupid.
I'll walk you through this slowly since you seem like the type of person who needs their hand held.
"BL" is a broad genre term for anything where gay romance or gay eroticism takes central stage. Despite having "Love" in its name, it does not actually mean nor require the characters to be in love or display a conventional relationship to be a BL. As I said, it's also about gay eroticism—which 100% applies to Killing Stalking. Whether you want to admit it or not, a lot of scenes between Sangwoo and Yoonbum are fetishized. I am not giving an opinion here, I am stating fact.
And I'm stating fact because on the original site KS is published on, it's categorized as a BL. On top of that, Koogi—the author—has talked about, on numerous occasions, why she chose to make it a BL. You not wanting to acknowledge it as one doesn't change the fact that it is one
What who lied to you
Since we’re already holding hands, let’s get this straight. If this involved a man and a woman, it wouldn’t be labeled as erotica or smut—and if it were, it’d be fundamentally wrong for obvious reasons. Need me to explain that too? You say the scenes between Sangwoo and Yoonbum are fetishized—and they are—by the same fans who romanticize their relationship, ignoring how blatantly toxic and abusive it is. They overlook that the story is told from Yoonbum and Sangwoo’s perspectives, not an impartial third-person narrator. This unreliable narrative gives the events a warped, false sense of intimacy and eroticism—but that doesn’t mean it should be fetishized.
I’d argue it’s only categorized as BL because it contains sexually explicit content between two men, and anything with homosexual themes risks being flagged without that label. But just because Koogi or the platform labels it BL doesn’t mean it’s appropriate or beyond criticism. Promoting Killing Stalking as BL or yaoi is absurd, no matter how you define the genre.
So let me squeeze your hand tight when I say this: Someone with Stockholm syndrome cannot give consent. What you’re conveniently ignoring is that these so-called “erotic” scenes are rape, plain and simple. Labeling a story containing rape and abusive dynamics as "erotica" minimizes the trauma involved and glorifies exploitation. Trying to sugarcoat abuse with romantic or sexual tropes doesn’t change what it is—it just makes the harm easier to overlook.
. . . If this were between a man and woman, it would be labeled as erotica. That's essentially what the entire "dark romance" genre is. A lot of straight romance manhwa's are stories identical to this, if not even worse. Are you slow?
And again, I am not giving my opinion here. I am stating fact. You can argue what you want but what you want doesn't matter when Koogi, the author, has stated for herself that this is a BL. That's it. There's nothing you can say against that. Your disagreement doesn't matter.
You trying to argue that it's not a BL is just showing that you inherently misunderstand what BL is. I'm not going to argue with you when your entire argument is you just disagreeing with the mere concept of these things and whining that they don't fit and follow the made-up definition you want them to. That's not how shit works.
Labeling eroticized scenes as erotica isn't minimizing the trauma involved because there is no trauma. Because they're not real. The trauma of real people in real situations is a whole different thing that's disconnected from a fictional story that people have the choice to read or not read. Do you think the Saw movies are minimalizing the trauma of tortured individuals? Like just what level of retardation are you on