beta
The video is also (probably) against MC. Why? He mentions the "video" numerous of times as an alibi but we (the audience) do not know the context of the video or where the location is. The prosecutor and investigators seen it yet still ask the same questions. Why?
Because the video doesn't line up with MC. If MC is innocent, then they would've let him go since the video is aligned with his statement (or lack there of). Even ML is asking the same questions and he (kind of) know MC personally.
ML has seen uncomfortable things as well as done uncomfortable things, but maybe this was something that was beyond his level of comfort. What I got from the writing, we the audience would have been given context if that were the case, but we weren't. Obviously, we know he's the victim but that's because we followed him. Also, does anyone remember a camera during that? Yeah it was WHEN he walked in willingly