Damn what's with their beliefs, they really treat segss as nothing special and what with them saying if you don't want to have seggs with the guy then his going to cheat? Am I the only one being a pervert but lowkey has a old fashioned mind?
That's still a bullshit reason to cheat. If a guy/girl will leave or cheat on you if you don't have sex in your long relationship means it's not love but lust. I know it is being normalized by the new gen to have sex being not married yet but those reasoning is still stupid knowing being in a relationship does not always required to have sex except if married since it's one of the marital purpose/duty (unless the other does not want to always do the duty since it can't be force even if married)
My reply is getting longer, but yeah, it's a fucking ridiculous reason to cheat and leave someone. Just lusting not loving
Is the author dumb 9r did he/she just create a dumb ML? Didn't he even research about the relationship of the siblings? And what's he going to get revenge with? The author didn't put any common sense in this story
agreed so much. I'm so confused what the male lead is trying to even revenge. Ian killed his sister so he's all like "I need to revenge his direct family members" even when said direct family member's didn't approve of him and aren't even associated with what he did. Like ?? It's so confusing to me, there's no drive to him and I just have to watch him get torture porned and being so resilient for no reason.
I'm still in chappy 29 and being guilty after they treat her like that is a bit hypocrite like and I'm more hating the adopted father and the 2 little sh*t heads than the previous saint cause the saint didn't give her a hope for being loved not like those three hypocrites