Unironically think Sadistic Beauty has better writing than Jinx
Don’t mistake “better writing” for anything else—I don’t mean that the MC or the guy “pursuing” him are more likeable as people, or that their relationship is healthier than Dan and Jaekyung’s or anything else like that. What’s depicted there is very obviously and horrifically toxic and abusive, but that’s the thing—the author actually seems perfectly aware of that fact, unlike Jinx’s author.
We see the MC’s mental state gradually deteriorate over time the longer he’s with the other guy, going from someone desperately fighting against him and trying to escape, to someone who has fallen into learned helplessness, hopelessness, and despair. He develops suicidal ideations and starts drinking to cope. Throughout this, he catches his mindset shifting and changing because of the treatment, and he doubts himself and his reality. Even at the end when he ends up going back to the other guy, it’s clear he’s doing it not because he genuinely loves the guy, but because he still feels he has no hope in anyone or anyone else.
And the other guy, as crazy and selfish as he is, does gradually pull back on said crazy behavior whenever he sees he’s pushed MC too far, trying to make up for it. He unchains MC eventually, lavishes gifts on him, gives him bits and pieces of his freedom back over time, promises not to freak out each time after he’s done something else horrible to the MC. It’s a very classical, textbook pattern of abuse. And even this guy, again, crazy and selfish as he is, seems to hold some type of…care or affection for the MC—enough that MC’s suicide attempt shakes him so deeply to his bones that he’s willingly (at least for a bit) to finally let MC go.
So it’s just, yeah. Comparing that to Jinx and how shallow and static Dan and Jaekyung’s characters are, and how stagnant their dynamic is and has been throughout these 52 episodes of season 1…seeing how Jinx’s author hasn’t done the bare minimum in acknowledging and depicting the reality of what is happening in her own webtoon, at least not yet…yeah I do think that author has a leg up on Jinx in terms of story and characterization. Who knows, though. Maybe I will be surprised by season 2.
I think Jaekyung x Heesung would be such an interesting dynamic. Two batshit insane human beings in their own ways. Lowkey can’t stand each other and yet are the only two people presented in this webtoon so far who can actually match each other’s freaks (and strength/power). Two tops. I know the sex would be fucking crazy. I want to see who ends up winning out and beating the other into reluctant/begrudging submission. I think my money’s on Heesung that guy lowkey seems more insane than Jaekyung ngl. Plus there’s simply something satisfying about the idea of that Jaekyung guy getting the cockiness fucked out of him.
What do you like about this webtoon? I’m genuinely asking. I have things that I do like about it but I don’t think I’ve seen anyone else articulate what they liked about it other than saying that the art is good (agree, though I have my own stylistic preferences that make me shrug about certain anatomical things) and the plot is good (…disagree). What about the art do you like? What about the plot do you like? Particular characters/characterization? Character design? Story arcs/plotlines? Particular story elements/tropes? The writing overall? I’m curious.
Nah you’re good LOL
I do get holding out hope for the groveling/chasing arc though. For me personally it’s hard for me to root for them getting together at all even if Jaekyung becomes an angel on earth, but I’m interested in how that will play out/how the author will try to…pull that off in a believable fashion, given all that Jaekyung has done to Dan.
But other than that, I’m wondering what else people find entertaining about this!
Personally, i like Jinx because: i like the trope ennemie to lovers or grumpy & sunshine (here it's more like asshole / lovable XD). Because i love getting riled up about a character, having reactions, a vibrant story. Then with this story and this author, i always find it satisfying to see a character condescending, groveling. It counterbalances the forces on the other side, it's so satisfying (i confess ahah). There's also the idea of seeing characters, emotions and behaviors evolve. It's entertaining to read. The illustrations are wonderful too. (≧∀≦)
I see, thank you for answering! I generally like those tropes (enemies to lovers, grumpy/sunshine) too, when they're done well. I personally don't see the enemies to lovers of Dan and Jaekyung's relationship—it feels a bit too one-sided to me—but I can see where you're coming from. I agree it can be nice to see a condescending character get knocked down a few pegs and to see how dynamics change and develop over time.
What about the art do you like?
I'm an artist, I love beautiful arts
What about the plot do you like?
I love the way the creator switches up the pov to tell the stories from certain characters or from outsiders to make it unfold as if you're also also part of the story. Good writing style.
Particular characters/characterization?
Hypermascusline characters that are almost true to the real world. The hyper fixation on outer appearances and the other normal characters like Kim Dan's body type who is slender without working out like the average Asian person.
•Superstition. Believe it or not, many successful people are superstitious (if they're not Christians) because that is the way of the world. As a pagan and an atheist, I can relate to this culturally and spiritually. It's dumb but it can also be real when your opponents can do black magic and suck lucifer's dicks. As an atheist, whenever I feel bothered, I only have to call my Christian friends to help me out and they'll pray for me. It works like a charm that you can buy from the temples. Charms from the temples are excessively expensive compared to the free prayers my Christian friends give. Pagans like me who have Christian friends understand that their God is a kind God who never fails to help even pagans like myself. As a pagan and an atheist, I'm very aware of my lifestyle that don't connect with my Christian friends. They pray for what is right and good. I pray for my enemies to die or fail. I've prayed for worse but these days, I've prayed for something better. Sending good vibes only. People think it's funny for pagans to have rituals. Well, that's the way I was raised. I don't plan on changing anytime soon. Even pagans like myself have high moral attributes. For one, I don't eat meat. I'm vegan. I can 100℅ confirm that I have strong morality since I was raised vegan (vegan baby) and I'm absolutely kinder than most people. My way of life is different than Christians but I can understand them from my own personal experience. Many people hate vegans as much as they hate Christians.
•Hot tempered men and very competitive sportsmanship
•Level headed, nurturing and caring men
•Opposites attract
•One sided love
•Age gap
•Highly attractive characters (for example like JaeKyung) who thinks he's naturally able to have anyone he desires (Most attractive people date other attractive people. They don't simply date anyone. They have to be the one to take the first step because most people think they're already taken. Meaning, JaeKyung is more assertive and decisive because he's in a different position).
•Kim Dan's desperate character. In this economy, nobody will blame Kim Dan for doing what's he's doing. Prostitution is one of the oldest jobs in the world. Is he a bad person for doing this? Well, can you blame him? He's doing what he can to protect someone important. Sometimes, people do crazy things to survive. He's in a serious survival mode. I love his character even though he's very weak and indecisive (he can't think of better ways to earn more money). I also love his loyalty to his granny. I respect that. That is a deep love that anyone can relate to if they have family.
Character design?
Beautiful designs.
•As the Japanese say, BL male characters are bishounen and they look similar to Asian features, thry have that youthful looks.
•Good body ref diversity. Granny looks real like a granny. Coaches look good and authoritative. Athletes look like athletes. Kim Dan looks like a Kim Dan.
Story arcs/plotlines?
• I love the modern urban setting and the unpredictable sports atmosphere.
• When Kim Dan's in trouble and dealing with his darkest moments, JaeKyung is always there for him. After seeing Kim Dan's struggle, he gradually warms up to him although he is still overbearing and selfish.
Particular story elements/tropes?
•High adrenaline men's sports
•Sports
•Slice of Life
•Work Life (clear roles and hierarchy)
•Adult/mature themes
•Hot tempered men and very competitive sportsmanship
•Level headed, nurturing and caring men
•The pagan way of dealing with life's hardships. Anal sex in satanism is not a new occurrence. It's happened for so long. That's how the rituals can power up the vessels from fucking the conduit and gain strength. Pagan way of life is evil in Christians' eyes because they follow the Bible and have seen things when the venture into the dark places of the world who take from the weak and initiate victims by satanic sexual abuse rituals. Not very gruesome like in our reality. This is the innocent version of satanism. Conditioning victims to accept the abuse and make them want it themselves. It is a good story regardless. Well written. It'd be more interesting if the creator delve into the spiritual part of the jinx to make it more amusing to read too bad she's not up for it (she needs to do a lot of research).
The writing overall?
Too early to decide and judge. I still enjoyed reading the webtoon.
For the people who insist on saying that Jaekyung isn't a rapist...
A lot of you acknowledge that Jaekyung is a violent and abusive asshole though, right? So why is calling him a rapist too much of a stretch for you? If you already think he’s a bad person, then why resist adding the label of rapist, especially when Jaekyung continues rough, sexual activity with Dan at several points throughout the webtoon, even as Dan repeatedly says no? Even without factoring the financial coercion, the threats, the use of physical force, or the power imbalance between them...doesn't no mean no? Isn't it the case that if someone’s no is ignored, then any action that comes afterwards isn't really consensual?
Would calling Jaekyung a rapist disrupt your enjoyment of his character and/or this webtoon?
Because you can still find him entertaining as a character while acknowledging he rapes Dan. I know I've had moments where I had to laugh because of how ridiculously awful he is, but I still recognize what he’s doing. And there are other enjoyable parts of this webtoon, like the art, other characters, their relationships, etc. People who say you're a bad person for reading and enjoying it just because it has rape, even romanticized rape, are being reductive. Enjoyment and acknowledgment can coexist.
Would calling him a rapist mean you could no longer root for him or his and Dan’s relationship?
There mere fact and extent of his abusive behavior, with or without rape, would or should be enough to inspire those thoughts and feelings. Nonetheless you can still want to see how the author “fixes” Jaekyung while acknowledging his actions. Personally, I can't root for the two being together but I still want to see how the author goes about “fixing” him.
Are you differentiating between rape and sexual assault?
The only thing really distinguishing the two is whether or not penetration was involved. And penetration was most certainly involved, which means Jaekyung most certainly raped Dan several times.
Is it because Dan is being paid to endure Jaekyung's treatment of him? Or because at some point he agreed to Jaekyung’s terms?
Financial coercion, or any type of coercion, being used to obtain a "yes" from someone, does not constitute a real "yes." Dan only says yes because saying no would mean him losing life-saving/life-changing money, and him being physically harmed—it isn’t a free and enthusiastic choice. It's like saying a robbery victim “wanted” to give their money to the person holding a gun to their head. And just because Dan agrees to one thing at one point in time, doesn't mean he's agreeing to anything and everything all the time. And even if that IS what he's agreeing on—it doesn't mean he can never, ever take back that agreement. No means no. People generally agree consent can be withdrawn at any time.
Is It because in so much yaoi and in romance in general, no doesn't mean no? That Dan's resistance isn't genuine, and that the story is playing into a rape/noncon/ravishment sexual fantasy?
Even the fantasy is called a rape/noncon fantasy. Rape is the fundamental element of the dynamic between them, even in a fantastical context. So Jaekyung is either raping or "raping" Dan either way.
But to the point of it being a fantasy of some kind...isn't Dan supposed to be shown to enjoy it in some way? Aren't the real consequences of raping someone meant to be put aside for the sake of the fantasy? Dan doesn't start to "enjoy" what's happening until much later on in the webtoon, and it's still only a physical reaction he's having, not a psychological enjoyment. He's still shown to want to have much gentler sex with Jaekyung, not a form of the violent sex that Jaekyung so often subjects him to but just toned down so he isn't physically hurt as much. The webtoon goes out of its way to show how Jaekyung's sexual violence has physical and psychological impacts on Dan. Their first interaction together ends up with Dan staying in bed for days, curled up, sleepless, exhausted, in pain—visibly depressed and anxious. At one point Jaekyung fucks him so hard he passes out, and the doctor who arrives to check him out is horrified by the injuries Dan has sustained because of Jaekyung's treatment. Jaekyung's coach calls out Jaekyung for his mistreatment of Dan for MUCH LESS than what he even knows Jaekyung is and has been doing to him. Even Heesung, shady as he is, finds Jaekyung's treatment of Dan to be awful, knowing full well what it is. What is fantastical about these moments? What is enjoyable?
What about this isn’t this straightforward? I know that why and how the rape is happening may be complicated, but isn’t rape just rape? I genuinely don’t get why there’s so much resistance to calling it that.
To the Community:
I don’t engage with Akito due to how he has treated both me and others. He’s admitted to being aggressive with me, and his handling of situations is outright abusive. So, should we apply his own standards to his actions?
No. Just like his abusive behavior doesn't make him a rapist, the same applies here. If he’s pushing this narrative, he’s implicating himself.
That said, I think it’s important to address some of the claims being made, particularly around what constitutes sexual assault, coercion, and abuse.
First off, there’s no denying that Jaekyung is an abusive character. His treatment of Dan involves coercion, violence, and significant power imbalances that can’t be overlooked. But I believe it’s a major leap to equate those actions with rape. Abuse comes in many forms, and while Jaekyung’s emotional manipulation of Dan is clearly harmful, that doesn’t automatically mean we should label him a “rapist.” It’s crucial to distinguish between different types of abuse so that we don’t oversimplify these complex dynamics.
I also want to highlight that just because a character does bad things, it doesn’t mean we need to throw every possible negative label at them. People can still enjoy the story, be curious about the character’s growth or redemption, or just want to see how the narrative unfolds, without excusing every action. Acknowledging abuse doesn’t mean we need to leap to the most extreme accusations unless it’s warranted by the story itself.
In Jaekyung’s case, while his actions may involve rough, non-consensual behavior at times, it’s important to recognize that abuse or coercion doesn’t necessarily equate to rape. Being clear about these distinctions helps us understand both the characters and the narrative more accurately.
In fiction, especially in genres like yaoi, problematic dynamics are often depicted. That doesn’t mean that every troubling or uncomfortable scene automatically crosses into rape or sexual assault territory. Let’s remember that and be mindful in how we discuss these issues, so we don’t blur the lines between different forms of harm.
I see what you’re trying to do here—acknowledging the situation without being confrontational. Here’s a refined version that keeps the tone neutral while addressing the issue clearly:
This is my second comment. Please take a moment to compare the profiles involved.
Clarification on Impersonation and Cyberstalking
It’s come to my attention that the individual impersonating me has made several comments, attempting to manipulate the situation by claiming I feel threatened. To clarify, I am not the one feeling threatened—*they* are the ones engaging in impersonation and cyberstalking. These actions are meant to undermine me and others in the community, twisting the narrative to deflect attention from their harmful behavior.
The impersonator continues to misrepresent my words and mock my responses. However, this does not change the fact that their behavior—impersonation, cyberstalking, and harassment—is the real issue here. They are not engaging in genuine discussion but are instead using sarcasm and misinformation to discredit my points and manipulate the conversation.
While I’ve pointed out the abusive nature of Jaekyung’s character in the webtoon, I want to emphasize that we cannot apply this type of logic carelessly. If we were to follow the Akatio’s logic, does their abusive behavior mean we should apply the same extreme labels like a rapist to them? Of course not, and this shows how harmful their narrative is when turned back on them.
I encourage everyone to stay vigilant and avoid engaging with impersonators. Their tactics are designed to confuse and manipulate. Please remember that impersonation and cyberstalking are serious issues, and your safety and well-being online should come first.
To be clear, I have never admitted to the claims they are making, and their sarcastic responses do not prove anything. What this behavior does show is a pattern of abuse, which is why it’s crucial to avoid engaging with this person.
If you find these comments misleading or aggressive, it’s because they are intended to distract and confuse. Let’s focus on addressing harmful behaviors and creating a safer, more respectful community, free from harassment and manipulation.
It’s important to clarify the difference between non-consensual behavior and rape, as these terms are often used interchangeably, but they’re not always the same in legal or narrative contexts.
Non-consensual behavior can include a wide range of actions that occur without someone’s explicit agreement—this could be physical, emotional, or sexual. Rape, on the other hand, specifically involves sexual penetration without consent, which is a severe form of non-consensual behavior but not the only form.
In Jaekyung's case, while his actions include abusive, coercive, and non-consensual behaviors, the discussion is whether those actions meet the specific definition of rape. Some forms of abuse, even if harmful or coercive, don't always fit the legal or narrative definition of rape. It’s important to make these distinctions so we can discuss the harm being done with the appropriate terms.
I'm not dismissing the gravity of what Jaekyung does, but rather trying to be precise with language when discussing complex dynamics in fiction.
Clarification on Disengagement and Misrepresentation
I want to clarify a few things regarding the ongoing conversation. First, I am not MD, and it seems there has been confusion on that front. MD and Akaito has never spoken to each other.
Also, I have every right to disengage from someone who has created a toxic environment for me and others. Akaito has admitted to being aggressive, but what hasn’t been acknowledged is how his behavior has affected those around him, including myself. While I respect differing opinions, the way conversations have unfolded—including spreading misinformation and attacking people who hold different views—has made it clear that it’s not a space for productive discussion.
For that reason, I chose to disengage from speaking directly with Akaito. My intent in commenting wasn’t to address him personally but to contribute to the broader conversation. I believe it’s possible to discuss ideas without directly engaging with someone who has a pattern of aggressive or harmful behavior.
I understand some people thrive on debate, but personal attacks, stalking from one topic to another, and the use of insults doesn’t create a space for meaningful dialogue. I’m here to exchange ideas, but I won’t be engaging with people who resort to toxic tactics to make their point. Let’s focus on creating a community where everyone can feel comfortable expressing their views without fear of harassment.
I know that's someone else already said this, but I'm gonna say it again. Because they had a contract, which stated that they would have sex whenever and wherever Jaekyung wanted to, no matter the circumstances. And Dan agreed to that while knowing exactly what he was getting himself into. So, having sex with Jaekyung and being his physical therapist is literally Dan's job, that's how he earns his pay. This means that him saying no to sex is him breaking the contract and not doing his job correctly.
But that doesn't mean that Jaekyung is completely innocent. The way he treats Dan is not okay, he is rough and has a temper. But yet again... he doesn't owe Dan anything. They are not in a romantic relationship, it's totally contractual. And it always has been. It was always about Jaekyung getting pleasure and having his jinx taken care of. Of course he wouldn't care about Dan feeling good. Because it's not about that.
And you can say all you want that Dan didn't have any choice and got forced to sign the contract, but that's not true at all. He was the one who ran over to Jaekyung's place all by himself, and he even asked for more money than he was originally offered. And that was then Jaekyung also spiced up his terms and came up with the sex whenever and wherever thing. Because before that he only wanted Dan to be his physical therapist and only have sex with him the day before a match. And to point something out; Jaekyung didn't even know about Dan's grandma or his debt back then.
We are starting to leave this “I see what you’re trying to do here—acknowledging the situation without being confrontational. Here’s a refined version that keeps the tone neutral while addressing the issue clearly:
”
It is refining what we write. It is not writing for us. “Refine version”. It can’t refine something if it is creating a message as Akaito has accused us of doing. We explain this many times but Akaito kept his interpretation to keep attacking us.
Before we get into the nuances of what’s going on with Dan and Jaekyung, please provide me your definition of consent. I just want to make absolute sure we’re on the same page before we start getting into the real complications of everything and where I’m coming from with this. If we fundamentally disagree on how consent works/how it’s defined, then I don’t think we will be able to discuss this without talking past each other. I will just copy-paste what I’ve said elsewhere:
I am personally operating off of the FRIES model of consent. That is, consent must be: Freely given (without pressure, manipulation, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol), Reversible (able to be taken back at any time), Informed (all parties must disclose any information that might threaten the safety of the interaction, any information that would cause someone not to consent), Enthusiastic (parties involved are doing things they really want to do and have expressed as much), and Specific (agreeing or consenting to one act doesn’t mean a party agrees to or consents to any and all acts).
There’s also the CRISP model of consent, which takes into consideration the fact that it can be difficult to always fully “freely give” consent because things like power dynamics and different systems of oppression (like sexism, racism, …capitalism, etc) can’t always be fully erased from an interaction, but can and should still be accounted for in some way. The C stands for Considered (as in all parties are given time to consider all the factors going into something and deciding whether or not they want to consent), and the P stands for Participatory (as in all parties need to be involved in the decision-making process, all parties need to have their thoughts, feelings, opinions heard and considered and accounted for).
My own nuances I’d add are: consent must be ongoing, as in should be acquired throughout an interaction (which is partially covered by the Specific clause) and that all parties, but especially the dominant/giving party or parties, are responsible for deliberately fostering an environment where consent can operate from within these models.
Okay, I’m glad we both agree on FRIES. I’ll also agree that Dan and Jaekyung’s “contract” does complicate things but, also, really doesn’t—at least not to me.
Before we talk about their contract, I want to talk about their very first interaction. To me, this case is very clearly rape. At that point they were not under any blanket contractual agreement stipulating that sex would/could be had “whenever and wherever” Jaekyung wanted to. Jaekyung lied and told Dan that he would be getting money for doing physical therapy. Dan agreed to doing physical therapy. It is not until after Dan arrives that Jaekyung says that he would be getting paid for sex. This is called a bait-and-switch, which is a manipulation tactic. Consent attained due to manipulation violates the “freely given” aspect of FRIES. It is also not until this point that Jaekyung says that Dan won’t receive money unless he has sex with him, which is coercive regardless of whether or not Jaekyung personally knows about Dan’s financial situation. Again, this violates the “freely given” aspect.
I’d also like to point out that there is a huge power imbalance between Dan and Jaekyung—physically, financially, and in terms of status. Power imbalances can often muddy consent. This is just one part of why we have age of consent, for example—because the power an adult holds over a child can easily be abused. Or why employer-employee relationships are discouraged. The possibility of the employee being fired from their job and even blacklisted from other places of work if they don’t accept an employer’s advances can and often does create a situation where the employee feels pressured, directly or indirectly, to comply with their employer, even if they don’t really want to (frankly, we saw this exact scenario happen to Dan and his former boss right at the beginning of the webtoon).
But okay, Dan agrees because he needs the money (not really an enthusiastic consent, either). Still, throughout their first interaction, he frequently tells Jaekyung “no” or “stop” or “wait” and asks for Jaekyung to be gentler. Jaekyung outright ignores his pleas, and even threatens Dan and uses physical force on him. He threatens to break Dan’s ankle when Dan struggles and asks him to wait, threatens Dan saying “If you waste my time like that last little bitch, don’t expect to be sent home safe and sound” (referencing someone whose head he slammed into the wall just minutes before) when Dan says he can’t go through with the sex after all, shoves Dan’s face into the mattress before saying “keep testing my patience and i’ll smash your head in” when Dan tells him it hurts and he wants to stop, pulls Dan to him as Dan tries to crawl away from him…and more. These are all blatant violations of the “reversible” aspect of FRIES, as well as the “freely given” aspect. Dan revokes his consent and that isn’t respected, and any consent he does give is under explicit threat of physical violence.
Am I missing something here that changes this interpretation of events? Because this looks like clear rape to me.
Sure. Apologies for the long response, by the way. I just want to make sure I’m articulating myself and my concerns very clearly.
Let me clarify that I don’t personally care much about this webtoon itself. Jaekyung’s actions do disgust and upset me, but…shouldn’t they? Generally readers are meant to empathize with the main character and feel upset when they’re hurt.
That said, I understand that the story is fictional, and that reading and enjoying it is not inherently harmful. I understand the relationship between fiction and reality isn’t 1-to-1, that most readers can separate the two, that they’re reading it, having their fun, and not necessarily picking up any new ideas from it. But the way that people respond to fiction, especially when that fiction is quite true to life, can reveal a lot about how people think. And all fiction, whether you like it or not, either reinforces societal norms or critiques them. So seeing how people respond to this question of whether or not rape is depicted and the rationale they use is very concerning to me.
My primary concern is with victim blaming. Many have argued that Dan just shouldn’t have agreed to any relationship with Jaekyung, that he should’ve known better and done something differently, that he’s partially at fault for his situation. Doing this not only shifts responsibility away from Jaekyung, who has almost all the power in their relationship, but it also completely ignores the realities of Dan’s situation. Both of these things, Jaekyung’s power, and Dan’s destitution, muddy consent.
Let me not mince words. Dan was deep in POVERTY. He was in crippling financial debt. His grandmother’s treatment was wracking up more bills. He was already working three jobs to survive. He lived in the slums. He was going to be evicted and end up homeless because he couldn’t afford to move to a new place. His former boss fucked his ability to earn money in his own field by getting him blacklisted from nearby hospitals. He was MALNOURISHED, which we learn from a doctor visit.
Given all of this, real choice was he supposed to make? Why should he be blamed for having his vulnerability exploited? If you agree with that consent must be freely given, without manipulation and coercion, then what freedom does Dan really have to say no? Whether or not Jaekyung knew about his personal financial situation doesn’t matter—he took advantage of and exploited Dan.
(Sidenote: almost no one who isn’t obviously desperate for money and yet so unwilling to have sex with it would fold under the threat of having it taken away. If Jaekyung cared not to abuse his power, he would’ve put a stop to things. He didn’t, even after finding out about Dan’s circumstances.)
Dan’s situation isn’t just fictional. It’s the reality of many people who are homeless and/or in poverty, who end up resorting to dangerous, unregulated sex work in order to survive, and who end up abused and exploited because they have no protections and no money or power to protect themselves or seek recourse. And the same way that people are blaming Dan for his circumstances is the same way that people blame those that end up in abusive, exploitative relationships in real life.
So it makes me worried that some readers wouldn’t be able to identify a coercive or abusive situation in real life, and might blame a victim of coercion and abuse for their circumstances and for not getting out of them. It makes me worry that they would blame themselves if they were out in a similar situation, even if it wasn’t their fault—that they’d blame themselves for folding under undue pressure.
This isn’t about the webtoon for me, and it never was. It is about the people who are reading it and how they’re responding to it. That’s the difference that it makes for me. That’s why the rape label matters. That’s why I care so much.
I’m genuinely sorry that you’ve been in those situations. It’s unfortunately a very common experience :/ and indeed, for many reasons, it can be really hard to know what exactly to say or do. Sometimes you do know what you should say or do, but so many things can get in the way of that—fear, guilt, shame…
Anyway, I’m glad you can see where I’m coming from. When I’m having these conversations with people, I usually tend to highlight how strong Jaekyung is and how he uses that strength, precisely to demonstrate how fear in particular plays such a huge role in Jaekyung and Dan’s dynamic, y’know? Because, yeah, it can feel hard to say no, even when you really want to, when you’re afraid of what will happen if you do. And this particular type of dynamic can foster deep feelings of helplessness, shame, and guilt in people—they sit there like you, thinking, “why didn’t I do something?” when in all likelihood they were having a natural response to an environment they felt afraid or unsafe in, and did what they thought would preserve whatever safety they did have.
Yes, everyone is responsible for clearly communicating their boundaries. But everyone is also responsible for creating an environment where people feel safe enough to communicate those boundaries in the first place. Fear isn’t conducive to doing that. And not only does Jaekyung not try to create a safe environment, he also often utilizes his physical strength to scare and force Dan into compliance.
Bro chill out a bit, man. I understand your frustration, believe me, but some people really do just need to have things pointed out to them. Especially in this case where it’s…I mean I wouldn’t say it’s that ambiguous, personally, but I can see how people might not immediately get it if they’re less informed about how coercion works and plays into this (not to mention, yeah, all the socioneconomic stuff I’ve been discussing).
I care And you’d know why if you bothered to read any of what I’m saying and have been saying. I care about real life people, yes, even including you, and how they will be impacted and impact others if they lack an understanding of consent and coercion.
Why don’t you use your free time to do something other than respond to me if you care so little and have so little patience? If you have nothing new to add to the conversation then simply remain silent.
Okay so, I'm just gonna say this to wrap things up. I do believe that if there were no contract then it would be rape. I think we can all agree on that. But I do still believe that now that there is a contract there is no rape, because they have this agreement about sex whenever and wherever. So yeah, that's my take on it. And if you disagree then that's fine. I can understand where you are coming from, but I just don't agree in this situation.
Thank you very much for hearing me out, sincerely. Again, I’m really glad you could see where I was coming from and I’m glad you understand now how at least some of Jaekyung’s actions have been nonconsensual.
I’ve been thinking about the contractual agreement and how it’s been worded and how it’s being enforced. Again, I just want you to hear me out on this. Can I ask first if you work or if you go to school?
Cool! Me too :) I also work two jobs at the moment. Okay well technically three…? All part time LOL but anyway, okay—let’s say for one reason or another, you can’t or don’t want to go to school. Can your school force you to go to school? Can they physically take you from your home (or wherever you are at the moment) and make you sit in your classes for that day?
If they did, wouldn’t that be against your will? Even though you’re (likely) legally obligated to go to school?
I’ll say that for work, even though I’m legally obligated to, well, do my work…I don’t have to. And it is in fact illegal for employers, at least where I am, to force me to come into work, or to keep me at work/force me to work overtime.
Sure! My grades would suffer if I didn’t go to school. I wouldn’t be able to spend money on things I want AND need if I didn’t have my jobs. So I choose to work.
But—I still retain my right to say no. Neither my school nor my work can force me to come into school or work against my will. They can expel me, terminate me, pursue legal action against me…but they cannot force me to work against my will. At that point they are not only doing something outside of the contract, but they are also doing something that is outright illegal in many places.
Let’s get back to the webtoon.
To begin with, we both agree with the FRIES model of consent, which states that true consent must be able to be reversed, and that true consent must be specific. This holds true under contracts as well. Any contract that completely waives out your right to say no is a slave contract, which strips away your basic human rights and renders you a piece of property. At that point it isn’t legal (in many places), moral, or ethical.
So if Dan’s work is sex work, and he says no to doing that work, then Jaekyung has every right to not pay him, to terminate their contract, and/or pursue action against him (more on that in a bit). He cannot force Dan to do work, AKA force him to continue having sex with him even after Dan has said no. He cannot take away Dan’s right to refuse harm or non-consensual acts, even under contract. Doing so crosses over into rape.
Their contract is in and of itself somewhat ambiguous. You said many times that it stipulated that Jaekyung can have sex with Dan “whenever, wherever, no matter the circumstances” right? I do believe you that that’s the exact wording! Even putting aside that Dan retains the right to take back his consent and/or agreement to the contract at any time, the contract doesn’t explicitly say that Jaekyung is entitled to having rough, painful sex with Dan. Dan is 100% within his rights to refuse that type of sex, and ask for something else to be done without facing some type of retaliation, as doing so does not violate their agreement.
All contracts can be renegotiated—even ones where someone initially agreed to all the terms. Even Jaekyung knows this. After Dan wins their little sparring match, he willingly opens the floor for Dan to make requests about how he wants their arrangement to change. Dan makes a couple requests, I believe, but the only one I explicitly remember is when he asks if Jaekyung could use condoms, and Jaekyung refused. Which just goes to show that Jaekyung holds most of the power and control in this situation, while Dan is put at heavy disadvantage, even as he tries to exercise his right to refuse.
So in conclusion, I believe that even under contract, Jaekyung rapes Dan several times. I will lend to you that things become somewhat more ambiguous, even for me, as Dan’s feelings start to develop. This doesn’t change or negate the fact that Jaekyung ignored his previous revocations of consent. Again, let me know if I’m missing anything or if there’s something I haven’t considered.
LMAO I forgot to clarify the “more on that in a bit” yeah the thing is Dan and Jaekyung’s contract is, I believe, a purely verbal one. I’m not 100% clear on what makes a contract legally binding or not, or how exactly to make a verbal agreement into a legally binding contract but nonetheless…unclear whether or not it’s a legally binding one.
Honestly this point isn’t really important to my broader point, but it is an interesting aspect of the contract nonetheless. Given that it’s not necessarily recorded anywhere, I believe it would make it very difficult for either of them to pursue any legal action in the case that either one of them breaks terms. Of course this would likely be much harder on Dan for a whole host of reasons, the most obvious one being he probably wouldn’t even be able to afford a good lawyer. Which frankly shows how in many ways, while, yeah, Dan is being paid well for his work, in terms of consequences? It’s still a wildly unfair contract for Dan in comparison for Jaekyung. Jaekyung, who can easily find another person to fuck, vs. Dan, whose job prospects are still probably kinda fucked.
I think it also highlights the flexibility of the contract. Again, any contract can be renegotiated, but a verbal one that isn’t even down in writing? No lawyers involved in its creation? You, or well, THEY can just kind of do whatever they want, decide on whatever, whenever. Again, Jaekyung can just…not do what he’s doing.
I'm not gonna comment on anything else, I just want to point this out: that yes, we only get to witness their verbal agreement, but I think they also have a written agreement because when they agree on the terms of the contract Dan says something like this: "If you can give me this much money, I'll sign" and if I remember correctly, he also says in a different chapter something like this: "I know I signed a contract, but this is just too much."
AAAND one last thing. The reason why THIS stuff is importante to me in particular is because sex workers and the abuse, sexual assault, and rape they face also tends to be downplayed because they “signed up for it,” even though contracts for sex work also have rules and boundaries put in place to reflect the workers’ wishes and protect them, and even though those workers also still retain the right to say no and/or refuse to do things they don’t want to.
Fair enough! I don’t remember those details/that wording but I’ll take you at your word. That does address the (possible) legality of the contract but I don’t think it really changes my overall point that consent can still be violated under contract.
Thank you for conversing with me. I have been doing work regarding the teaching and portrayal of sex ed and consent for years now so this something close to my heart. Too many people are hurt due to misunderstandings about these things, and because of the culture (or cultures) we live in overall. So even if we don’t fully agree with each other, I really, really hope you took something meaningful away from the conversation, and that you can keep yourself and others a little safer from now on c:
i generally agree with the underlying ideas the “fiction doesn’t impact reality” crowd have, which are that people shouldn’t immediately assume that what an author depicts in fiction is reflective of their real life morality and that just because something troubling is portrayed in fiction doesn’t mean that it will immediately translate to real life, and that thinking it is the case that fiction can directly impact reality in such a way can lead to real life harm coming to people, or real life censorship and whatnot.
but a lot of you motherfuckers in these comments are making me start to think that maybe stories like these do need some kind of regulation. not because i’m upset that it exists in the way that it does, but because none of you seem to understand or even care to understand what the fuck you’re actually reading, none of you want to critically think about it, and none of you want anyone ELSE to critically think about it. then you use “it’s not that deep, it’s just fiction, fiction doesn’t impact reality” to justify your total disinterest in engaging with anything on a deeper level.
i guess i should start writing black people like monkeys in my story now, right? because it’s just fiction? or should i give all my asian characters slitted eyes and their only defining personality trait should be them being really good at math. it’s just a fictional story, so that should be fine, too. how about i make the women in my stories really dumb and overly emotional, too? since it’s just fiction, and i can do whatever i want, and it doesn’t impact or say anything about anything in real life at all. should i write all my gay men as child predators, too? that would be a fascinating plot line, which has no repercussions and never has had any repercussions on people in real life.
come here and provide me with direct evidence from the webtoon that there is no rape depicted in it. give me your direct definition of rape. point me to specific chapters, i will go out of my way to reread them and tell you what i think and we can discuss from there. then, without defaulting to “it’s just fiction,” tell me why i should not be at least a little bit concerned that people are unable to tell when something is consensual vs. nonconsensual, REGARDLESS of it is in a fictional context or not.
It’s been years of trying to convince people that Jaekyung's actions toward Dan weren’t rape, but every attempt has failed. My use of alternate accounts, like Belovederose where I pretended to be a girl and a rape victim, only backfired. I was caught almost immediately, discredited for lying and creating fake personas. The same happened on my TM account where I claimed to be a lawyer—I couldn’t keep up the façade. After all this time on the site, I haven’t been able to sway even a single person to my side, and I’ve begun to realize that I was even trying to convince myself.
Now, I’ve decided to take a different approach—pretending to be a rape victim once again. I know that, by adopting this identity, people will place more weight on my words, and they’ll be less likely to question me. I don’t need proof anymore; the truth will be in my narrative. Of course, no one would willingly force themselves upon a 37-year-old man living on Mangago, but by presenting myself as a victim, I somehow become more credible, more desirable. Sure, I failed at being a girl on Belovederose, a lawyer on TM, and a gay father on Tora. I’ve been caught out every time. But no one can definitively tell me I wasn’t a rape victim—those claims are harder to dispute, and I know that gives me power. Just as no one can convince me that my use of ChatGPT isn’t blatantly obvious, I remain defiant in my narrative, regardless of its foundation in fiction.
Warning About Cyberstalking
[Morning Diamonds 10/7 is right September 20, 2024 6:50 pm] is a cyberstalker.
My friend will not engage with Akaito because of how Akaito treated my friend.
I want to bring attention to an ongoing issue of cyberstalking in this community. Cyberstalkers often impersonate others and spread misinformation to manipulate and harass individuals. Please be vigilant when interacting with users and verify their identities. If you suspect someone is engaging in cyberstalking or impersonation, and avoid engaging with them. Your safety and well-being are important!
I am not TM, but I was called a 'rape lover' by the cyberstalker. Is this not a reflection of their behavior? They resort to cyberstalking and impersonation to force others to see rape in a story or to silence differing opinions. This is deeply troubling and manipulative.
Moreover, their statement is contradictory. If someone is labeled a 'rape lover,' they would be inclined to see rape and believe Jaekyung is a rapist. However, there is no rape in Jinx; Jaekyung is a sexual assaulter. It seems like a projection of their own views rather than an accurate characterization of others. It’s concerning that they resort to such tactics.
Hey everyone,
Ignoring the cyberstalker impersonating my friend situation and making me one of their other targets (again).
Before you respond to Akaito look at how he has been treating others.
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/17083687/?page=1
Part 1: https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/16678110/
https://imgur.com/cfVWtrf
https://imgur.com/wk3AZ2t
https://imgur.com/A78VhFs
Part 2:
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/16683925/
https://imgur.com/GJc1kC3
https://imgur.com/w4ZZCCH
https://imgur.com/FGEPyQx
https://imgur.com/d1YJ4YS
https://imgur.com/QrEhrS9
https://imgur.com/2KAMV42
https://imgur.com/fBUx6KG
https://imgur.com/jD8K5VV
https://imgur.com/EByYGCh
https://imgur.com/XM0mbPW
https://imgur.com/GYH1Ukh
https://imgur.com/N8VTmyk (expressing the desire to keep "pressing" us.)
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/16746982/
https://imgur.com/nVJCHBA
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/17085670/
Warning About Cyberstalking
[TM joined on 1/26/20] September 23, 2024 8:38 pm is a cyberstalker. Look at the profiles. Two different people with two different accounts.
As the real [TM joined on 1/26/20] said.
I want to bring attention to an ongoing issue of cyberstalking in this community. Cyberstalkers often impersonate others and spread misinformation to manipulate and harass individuals. Please be vigilant when interacting with users and verify their identities. If you suspect someone is engaging in cyberstalking or impersonation, and avoid engaging with them. Your safety and well-being are important!
PS TM knows Jinx isn’t rape. The cyberstalker is spreading falsehoods. TM has said he thinks Jinx is dull too.
Morning diamonds has condemn Jk and don’t read toxic stories much.
This cyberstalker has make four of their targets to be one person. That is how desperate they are to silence the truth that goes against their beliefs.
The real user {MD Joined on 10/7/23} was called a 'rape defender' by the cyberstalker. Is this not a reflection of the cybestalker's behavior? They resort to cyberstalking and impersonation to force others to see rape in a story or to silence differing opinions. This is deeply troubling and manipulative.
Now I understand that for a lot of people, maybe even the author herself, Dan's purpose in this story is to be no more than a completely weak and helpless little baby bitch boy bottom who is to be fucked relentlessly and look pretty and cute while it’s happening—to be Jaekyung's punching bag and fucktoy until Jaekyung realizes that using people as punching bags and fucktoys (against their will) is bad, actually, and perhaps he should try being nice instead. As it stands, Dan fulfills those roles perfectly. Buuut. I think there is occasionally more to Dan than just being those two things, and much like how I think the webtoon could've/could benefit from leaning further into the abuse portrayed in it, I think it would've been/would benefit from the author leaning more into these moments when Dan rises above his status as a mere punching bag and fucktoy.
Dan and his love and care for others has been both a source of strength and weakness for him. Whenever he has a moment of strength in the webtoon, it’s been for someone else’s sake. He was able to put up with working multiple part time jobs not just because he kind of had to in order to survive, but because his grandma was terminally ill and he wanted to do anything he could to get her treated and to repay her for all that she'd done for him. And he of course, unfortunately, puts up with Jaekyung’s treatment of him, again because of his love for his grandma. Almost conversely, though, it is his love for his grandma that makes him able to stand up to Jaekyung and tell him to fuck off for a bit—I believe they're in the middle of sex when Dan gets an emergency call from the hospital, and Dan more confidently than he's been able to before refuses to continue the act, because his grandma’s wellbeing takes precedence over everything else. We hadn’t seen a moment like that from Dan before, from what I remember. It was to the point where even Jaekyung was surprised by the outburst.
Another moment where we get Dan's strength showing through due to his care for another character is when he challenges Jaekyung to a sparring match for the sake of fulfilling a wish he might have (and, as we know, to try to understand Jaekyung's occupation better so that he can be a better physical therapist to him). He gives it his all despite it seeming impossible for him to win, supposedly for his own, and Jaekyung's, personal gain. But when the fight is over and he ends up winning through almost underhanded means, again shocking Jaekyung, we learn he actually (partially) did it because he wanted to grant Potato's wish of sparring with Jaekyung!!!
Personally, I like these moments a lot—they deepen and complicate Dan's character, showing that despite the rest of his behavior, he does actually have his own hard lines drawn in the sand, and he is, or was, willing to do whatever it takes to defend those lines. They’re fun and interesting and sweet and pleasantly surprising, and they have/had the potential to pave the way for an exciting character arc for him—where he gradually learns to focus more on himself and the people and things he really cares about and learns to stand up for himself and those things more often. Where he, in essence, breaks out of the hell cycle of devaluation that Jaekyung traps him in.
I found myself curious about these moments because of Jaekyung’s reactions to them as well. We don’t get to find out much of what he’s thinking when they happen (although to be fair some details are fuzzy to me so maybe we do) but both times—the incident with Dan’s grandma and the sparring match—Jaekyung seems to be legitimately surprised and even impressed by Dan. Which, to me, similarly hinted at something possibly more complex about Jaekyung’s character. You’d expect him to have lashed out during these moments, but no…again, I don't remember the phone call incident as well, but I believe he really did let Dan go. And similarly, with the sparring match, he does later on allow Dan to express what his own PERSONAL wishes were (though he shuts them down, lol). Something about these moments genuinely take Jaekyung aback enough to not only please him, but also to want to kind of be nicer to Dan, and I couldn’t help but wonder why. I thought that maybe the author might’ve been doing that trope where the asshole character is being like “haha, you’re not like other girls, the other girls just fold under my abuse and/or run away, but you actually stand up to me and I think that’s sexy ". Which, to be clear, is in and of itself a bit of a ridiculous trope, but still interesting in its own right.
Unfortunately, as of season 1 we don’t/didn’t get any more of these moments like I hoped we might, which makes them seem more like one-off moments or complete flukes or mere plot devices (Dan's resistance might've been ultimately for the sake of Jaekyung going to pay off the hospital bills and make Dan feel more indebted to Jaekyung, and the Potato wish thing...well, who knows)—like they weren't deliberate choices made by the author. To be fair though—besides the obvious fact that the webtoon isn’t finished and so we could see more of this in season 2—character development does not have to be linear and it often isn’t. And it would make sense for Dan to have less moments like these over time, considering how much time he has spent isolated in his relationship with Jaekyung who has been nothing but horrible to him. But nonetheless it does feel a little disappointing and like wasted potential (as of now) for us to not have seen more of this side of Dan—Dan who can and will fight back for the people that he loves. I think having more of these moments earlier on not only could’ve added more character complexity to both Dan and Jaekyung, but it also would’ve made even more evident the impact that Jaekyung has on Dan, the way he demoralizes and wears Dan (and all the other people in his life) down, and makes it increasingly difficult to not just want to do whatever he wants to escape his abuse.
tl;dr Dan has moments of strength borne of his loving and caring nature, and I think that the webtoon could've and still could benefit from leaning further into those moments. It makes both Dan and Jaekyung's characters and interactions more interesting and complex.
nb4 "dan's few moments of strength aren't meant to be key moments, he's not meant to become stronger!" i'd say to that: yes, and. yes dan is meant to endure suffering from jaekyung for the sake of the bit And he can/could’ve done so while still exhibiting a few more moments of strength. yes he may not have ever meant to be strong or become strong And him becoming weaker over time is still perfectly compatible with the groveling arc, while also giving him and jaekyung more complexity as characters. in fact, writing it like this provides more material for the groveling arc and strengthens it—there could be (or could've been) a moment where jaekyung reflects on the early stages of his relationship with dan, realizing that over the course of their "relationship," dan had lost the fight that had been present in those early stages, realize it's his fault, and come to feel deep remorse over it. he could end up reflecting on how his relationship with dan and the way he erodes people's psyches isn’t a singular thing but something that happens in almost all his relationships with other people and be driven to change because of it. so ╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭
nb4 "dan isn’t meant to be strong or become strong, these weren't meant to be key moments!" to that i’ll only say yes, and. yes dan is meant to endure suffering from jaekyung for the sake of the bit And he can/could’ve done so while still exhibiting a few more moments of strength. yes he may not have ever meant to be strong or become strong And him becoming weaker over time is still perfectly compatible with the groveling arc we know the story is going to go on, while also giving him and jaekyung more complexity as characters. in fact, writing it like this provides more material for the groveling arc and strengthens it—there could be a moment where jaekyung realizes that the fight that dan used to have had eroded over the course of their "relationship" and feel deep remorse over it. he could end up reflecting on how his relationship with dan isn’t a singular thing but a consistent pattern of behavior he carries into all his relationships, and be driven to change because of it. so ╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭
I love your analysis and I hope that Dan really gets a development as a character..! I like Kim Dan a lot, he's a strong person who went through a lot and I just want to see him happy for once. Leaving aside the toxicity of jaekyung, I really want to know more about his character: from his childhood to his adulthood. Also, if I'm not wrong, the white haired guy teased something about jaekyung's past, right? I'm very impatient right now, I want to see what will happen in the next season!
thank you, i'm glad you liked it!! i really hope dan gets some substantial development, too, and that he can find happiness. he is truly the embodiment of precious cinnamon roll, too good for this world, too pure. i would prefer if he found happiness outside of jaekyung but, alas...i suppose i could settle with an ending where jaekyung becomes a better person and treats him right.
we did get that teaser about jaekyung's past though i am curious...we will just have to see.
Did you even read what I said? I obviously said this is a load of shit and if you dislike it so much stop writing essays about it.. It's going to be months for this manga to get a seaskon 2 because of how fucked this thing is. Nobody wants to see him fuck, trust me we all want this to be over or discontinued. Don't paint me as a weirdo.
i genuinely can’t tell if you’re meaning to insult me or not, especially since it seems you dislike the webtoon and…well i can’t say i hate the webtoon myself, i don’t care enough about it personally to hate it, but i’m certainly very critical of it myself—in which case i don’t really understand why you would be invested in me not expressing said criticism…
but to clarify: this is worth it to me. i like analyzing stuff and understanding how/why it works, how/why it doesn’t work, and how it could be (or could’ve been) improved. it is of great benefit to me as a writer myself, and it’s just plain fun for me. things that have incredibly missed potential—things with interesting concepts but poor execution—tend to especially capture my attention, and to me, this webtoon fits that criteria. as a result, i have a lot of thoughts about it, and i’d like to get those thoughts out of my brain and put them somewhere, share them with people who have actually read the thing i’m talking about and who are themselves interested in this kind of thing. it’s okay if you don’t see the point or value in it! but this is my personal fun. so i’ll keep having fun here and i will also have fun doing other things, too! you can do many things in this life :)
THANKKK you guys weren’t hearing me out when I literally called Akaito a fking weirdo bro stays in Mggao basement writing a whole ass argument essay on 2 dudes who literally like sucking dick and putting dick in they ass, yaoi is never that serious especially Jinx like they have this attitude towards Jinx imagine if their ass discover MRM
also my first paragraph here quite literally addresses the idea that a lot of y’all, including the author, might not/don’t care for this story other than to see dan getting fucked. it’s almost like if you take the time to read what people are saying, you’ll understand them and their points better, and not say things that are redundant. if you’re bothered by my essays then “don’t like don’t read” as they say, right? why are you trying to dissuade me? just keep pointing and laughing if you find it weird or pathetic, then we all win ╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭
agree to disagree then. i’ve read sign before though, a while back. it was really sweet from what i remember! but i do also remember getting jumpscared by random ass drunken sex in there anyway, i don’t have any particular interest in revisiting it—unless you want to pay me of course ;) honestly i don’t care for romance as a standalone genre anymore in general. the only reason why i came here in the first place was bc of a video essay that floated its way onto my algorithm, i wanted to investigate the source material myself and form my own opinions about it before watching. many such cases. and i am still here for the aforementioned reasons. if you have something that’s fantasy or sci-fi and/or features and deals with psychological stuff then maybe i’ll consider checking it out. alternatively, send me other could-have-been-great webtoons. LOL
i really don’t get why you’re continuing to interact with me without actually reading and understanding what i have to say, and it’s also getting annoying to see you constantly double down on things that are evidently not true. i do not hate this webtoon, i think it could have been written better. i do not take deep issue with the content portrayed in this webtoon, it is one very specific type of audience response to the webtoon i take issue with. i do not think this webtoon is the worst webtoon on earth, neither in terms of content or writing. even in this post i point out moments in the webtoon i liked and found interesting but that i, again, felt/feel the author could(‘ve) lean(ed) into more. if expressing my disappointment in the webtoon for not realizing the full potential that i legitimately see it having as a story (so far), if offering both praise and critiques of specific elements and moments of the webtoon, if thinking about ways things could have been written differently to strengthen the story laid out here as it is all just seem like me doing nothing but shitting on the webtoon then i really don’t know what to tell you. there is a difference between blind hatred and criticism and i suggest you uncouple yourself and your like for this webtoon enough to learn it. either read what i have to say in full or stop bothering to interact with my posts.
MRM definition according to urban dictionary since you wouldn’t tell me what it is and decided to call me close-minded about something i don’t even know about and ignorant of worse webtoons/stories: “myreadingmanga also shortened to mrm, a manga, comic, and video website thats just gay porn. usually known for having weird stuff. such incest, shotacon, mindbreak, etc.”
yeah buddy i’ve read this kind of stuff before. lol. lmao, even.
I think one of the most ironic "criticisms" leveled at me in the wake of my discussions about this webtoon is the idea that I simply can't handle dark and taboo themes. I could sit here and talk about the nature of the art that I regularly create and engage with but I'm not going to because I simply don't have to prove myself to anyone who doesn't care (if you want recommendations though, by all means, ask). The reality is it's not that I can't handle the toxic/abusive relationship presented in Jinx—on the contrary, I think this webtoon could benefit from leaning even more into it. It would make it a stronger story overall AND it would make it a somewhat stronger romance overall.
I'm not saying it was the author's intention to explore the complexities of an abusive relationship, nor do I think she has any particular obligation to do so. But the simple fact of the matter is that Jaekyung is abusive towards Dan. The author has chosen to include that as a key aspect of their relationship. And so, in light of that, one does have to think about how its being portrayed here, whether or not it's an accurate and/or nuanced depiction, and how it serves or harms the story overall.
Something that I think the story actually did well in its setup is providing good justification for why someone like Dan would end up stuck with someone like Jaekyung in the first place—the circumstances one would have to be in to end up in a Jaekyung's hands. We learn very early on the Dan is and has been struggling to make ends meet, that he is deep in debt, and that he has a terminally ill grandmother to take care of. These all provide sufficient and believable motivation for why Dan would not only end up in what is basically sexual slavery to Jaekyung, but also why he would "choose" to stay with him, despite all of his awful treatment—financial support and security. This isn't even to mention the threats of physical violence, amongst other things, that Dan might face from refusing him, but I digress.
What those circumstances don't really explain to me personally is how and why Dan would eventually come to uncritically fall in love with Jaekyung—to not have any doubts about his own feelings towards Jaekyung in the face of all the abuse, emotionally, sexually, physically, etc. Love doesn't typically have any set logic, but also...it kind of does. And stories undoubtedly tend to abide by some type of logic, or else they become incoherent to the reader.
We know that Dan was raised by his grandmother, but she was perfectly loving and caring of him—so she couldn’t have been the source of a bad model of love and relationships in his life. We do know that he was sexually assaulted by his former boss, but he hadn’t liked that former boss. His former boss made his move of his own volition, and Dan seems to have been able to recognize the wrongness in what his former boss had done to him. So how is it that he can fall in love with Jaekyung without seemingly recognizing the wrongness of their relationship, of what Jaekyung has been doing to him? Why is his only concern when he starts catching feelings is that Jaekyung won't reciprocate them? It reads like he is a completely naive and inexperienced/unknowledgeable teenager who has been conditioned by his parents to think that if his schoolmate teases and hits him, it's because he likes him. Dan is innocent and kind to a fault, yes...but he's also a grown ass adult.
What I think would make Dan’s uncritical love for Jaekyung seem more plausible is if the story explored patterns of abuse and conditioning from loved ones in his past. Like, for example, a parent or parents that equated financial support to love, even though they were emotionally distant/absent and/or outright abusive. Or if Dan had been in romantic relationships that involved elements of financial coercion before—a partner who gave gifts but always with the subtle pressure of getting something specific out of Dan, the idea that Dan should "make up" for said gifts. These are real things that people experience, and can set them up for engaging and getting stuck in abusive relationships in the future. It would make more sense for Dan to be forgiving and unresentful of Jaekyung and to even fall for him if that was something that he was taught to do in the past. But we simply don’t get that. Jaekyung is never kind to Dan in a way that seems to me like it might perpetuate the cycle of abuse—he is abusive from the get-go and does not change at all. He doesn't make any promises to treat Dan better to lure him into any false sense of security or hope, as is what commonly happens in abusive relationships. If anything, he gets worse as the webtoon progresses.
And worse yet, up till now, we have no understanding of WHY Jaekyung behaves the way he does, other than because he is simply a selfish, ungrateful, entitled prick. We don't know what happened throughout his own life for him to have become how he is as we see him. And honestly, at this point, for me at least, we have missed the narrative window on a backstory being something that might make me extend empathy towards him, or change my view of him. You could tell me he was bullied through all his years of school and I would not care. I bring this up mainly because another reason why people tend to choose to stay in abusive relationships is because they feel some sense of empathy for their abuser, or they feel responsible for making them better—the infamous "I can fix him." We get moments of Dan showing empathy towards Jaekyung and the stress he endures as a public figure and as an MMA fighter at that, and the insomnia he suffers from which...while fair, still does not really explain the sheer extent to which Dan is seemingly willing to forgive and/or excuse Jaekyung's actions and behaviors, and blame himself instead.
tl;dr the story could've benefited in a lot of ways from delving deeper and more seriously into its portrayal of abuse. it would've made the story more believable (to me) because the characters, their thoughts, feelings, and motivations would've made more sense, and would've been more interesting.
nb4 "the story isn't over yet" (if anyone even reads this lol) i know! and i think that some of these things could still maybe be incorporated later and somewhat benefit the story but...a lot of the elements i've mentioned here are typically things you'd introduce and hint at earlier on in the story (though there are various ways to tell a story, anyway). to add jaekyung's sad backstory now, for example, would almost feel like a very late attempt at an explanation for his actions previously. and some of these are things that i'm almost certain will never be incorporated into the story, as in, the author has no intention to do so, such as complicating dan's backstory. which is fine, it's her story, but i think it makes it weaker as a result.
I feel like it going “deeper into the portrayal of abuse” is just… an extremely unrealistic expectation. Im sure there are plenty of pieces of media out there that were made with the intention of doing so, and are probably written way better! Youre asking it to be some think piece this was obviously never going to be. BL isnt even supposed to be an accurate representation of gay guys, its more like the “idea” of a gay guy. Think of it the same way Euphoria depicts the “idea” of a teenager, rather than what a teenager actually is. I feel like trying to take this seriously would be a slap in the face to media that was ACTUALLY made with the intention of being taken seriously
Hm yeah I won’t deny I do tend to have high standards for/expectations of what art I engage with at this point in my life and you are right that there are other pieces of media that do part of what I’m asking for much better! I also know that I tend to be deeply interested in character psychology and how that impacts their interpersonal relationships with one another. It seems true enough to me that the author might not be interested in psychology all that much but she is evidently interested in the relationships. Either way yes, I can’t expect every story to delve into these things to the extent I might if I were writing them.
But at the same time, I don’t think my expectations here are all that unreasonable. Like I said, she chose to include the element into her story and have it be a prominent part of the dynamic between Jaekyung and Dan. To say it’s unrealistic of me to expect more out of that dynamic is like…it’s like, imagine we watch a movie together, and the camera spends an inordinate amount of time focusing on one specific door, but no one in the movie ever really interacts with the door. They might talk about it, they might walk around it, they might touch the doorknob, etc…but they never open it and we never see what’s behind it. Would it really be that unnatural for me to ask what the purpose of the door was? To wonder why they never opened the door? Or wonder what’s behind the door? And if it turned out the door wasn’t that significant then…why would you film the door so much in the first place? Wouldn’t it have been better for the showrunners to direct audience attention towards the things they find actually important?
I’m really not asking it to be a think piece, although I can see how/why you might’ve come to that conclusion based on what I wrote about here…I understand it’s ultimately trying to be a romance story with smut. But don’t you have to have some buy into the characters in a romance to want to see them together? Understand and sympathize with them and where they’re coming from? To me, I don’t even think that the author would have to do much to have deepened her characters a bit. Like with the idea of Dan having parents that enforced this idea of love as financial support—all it would’ve taken to establish something like that would be something like, maybe one little dream sequence. Like how we learn Dan is afraid of being alone from his dream where he’s younger and his grandma disappears for a bit (ough I’m tearing up thinking about it). We didn’t spend a lot of time in that dream, and the author didn’t have to say much about it thereafter, but it was a quick and efficient way to communicate something about Dan as a character and what motivates him without having to do much of anything else.
And like not to go Uno Reverse on you or anything, I’m saying this genuinely, but there are people who legitimately love this webtoon for whatever reason, or think that it’s great. I’m not necessarily trying to change their minds but like…isn’t saying that it’s not serious a slap to the face to both those readers and to the author herself? How do we know she isn’t putting her whole heart into creating this thing in whatever shape it’s taking? I think if it wasn’t meant to be serious it simply would’ve been just straight up porn most chapters, no?
Like y’know as a fic writer who loves their smut—I have a story that was originally supposed to be just porn with feelings, but then it grew a crazy plot. It still has the smut, but I’ve spent an inordinate amount of time developing the not-smut, too. If I wanted people to focus on the smut, I would’ve just cut back on all the other stuff…but I want them to focus on much more, so, yeah. And in fact, I have a series of one-shots that are just pure porn. They don’t fit into or really explore any broader/more complex context outside of the fucking because it’s just not supposed to be about the other stuff, y’know? But to me, this story feels like (or at least at the beginning) felt like it was trying to be about other stuff, too. So. But maybe not! ╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭
sorry i cut myself off, but i love how eloquent u r n i wholly agree with the points you make both in terms of just the general machinations of the human psyche and as elements of characters im a story like wow u hit it out of the park with this comment and it encapsulates my criticisms with a bunch of bl webtoons who try to pass of their "romance" amidst all the bullshit abusive mess as... passable ig, as something "deeper" than rushed and artificial and surface-level, as something the author can convince us is something that is genuine and compelling by itself instead of a romance that we can see is orchestrated by the author because there are fundamental parts and aspects of the characters and/story where this romance doesn't make sense and falls apart if we give it even at least more than 3 seconds of thought so yea i just wanted to commend the breakdown and criticism u provided here. also lowk find it funny how one of the more eloquent constructive criticism and explanation of character psychology ive found is on the comment section of a shitty bl smut webtoon on a pirated manga site like whoa u never know what life will throw at u
haha thank you!! i try :) yeah i didn’t expect to be in this comment section either but alas it’s a fun exercise for me to think through these things so might as well do it here…and i have so much more to say about this story and the things it could’ve done. and you know like, i understand that in many ways this is meant to be just smut or sexual fantasy or something “lighthearted” but it’s also like seriously am i meant to ignore the abuse? when you plan to and already have declared the characters are also in genuine love with each other? i’m sorry but that’s a level of cognitive dissonance i’m unable to suspend my disbelief enough to fall into
mm one more addendum to the idea that leaning more into the abuse is an unrealistic expectation of the story and what it’s trying to do—we all already know that at some point jaekyung is meant to realize all the wrong he’s done, right? i don’t know how this story is actually specifically going to play out beyond that but doesn’t this mean that jaekyung is himself going to have to acknowledge the abuse he carried out on dan, and how badly it impacted and still impacts him? even if we say oh okay we’re not gonna explore the past trauma these two must’ve/might’ve endured to become the way they are (which, as i said, feels like a weak move to me), won’t we at least have to address and explore the lingering trauma of This relationship? or, what, is it just gonna be dan being like “teehee i forgive you for months(?) of sexual violence and emotional abuse” the moment jaekyung turns coat, and there being zero evidence of said months(?) of sexual violence and emotional abuse left on dan’s psyche? forget about whether or not that’s realistic—is that even satisfying as a narrative arc?
My concern has never been about the existence of Jinx, nor has it ever been about people reading and enjoying Jinx. People will always write stories like Jinx. People will always like stories like Jinx. There is nothing in the goddamn fucking world that I can do about that that would not fall under fascistic dictatorship, and I simply do not care enough about the continued existence and consumption of this one single story enough to become a fucking fascist.
My concern has always been about the audience reception and interpretation of Jinx, and what impact it can have on real life victims of sexual assault. Yes, the story is fucking fictional. Yes, the story is in many parts (sexual) fantasy. Yes, the relationship between Dan and Jaekyung has some degree of nuance to it. Yes, those things are important to how the story should be interpreted. But also, your interpretation of this story is not fictional. Your beliefs and attitudes surrounding sex, sexuality, consent, and rape are not fictional. And any story, fictional/fantastical or not, can and does utilize elements of realism in order to make itself coherent to the reader, and in order to make itself seem at least somewhat believable. Any story can and often will say something about the real world, whether it is saying something new, or reiterating something old, whether it is rejecting the reality we live in, or embracing it. That is the fundamental nature of storytelling. That is why we engage with stories in the first place. Do not dare chat to me about "media literacy" if you don't know or understand this. You would not know media literacy if it payed $5,000 dollars to fuck you.
Let me be abundantly clear, because perhaps I have not been before. If you read this story and come away from it with the conclusion that Jaekyung does not ever rape Dan, or if you read this story and come to the conclusion that Dan is at fault, partially or wholly, for his victimization, however you define it—you would not be able to identify an instance of rape in real life. You would not be able to identify if it happened to a friend, or a family member, or yourself, unless it fit a VERY narrow set of parameters. And even then. You would not be able to respond properly—with understanding, with compassion—to it happening to yourself, or to anyone else. You would blame yourself for your victimization. You would blame someone else for their victimization. You would blame the victim.
Someone posted their story of having been sexually assaulted by a former partner on these forums yesterday, I believe. Another person today offered their "condolences," and then proceeded, completely unprompted, to rattle off nearly every single line from the victim blamer's book. "You should have chosen a better partner." "You should've known better." "You should've given a firmer no." "You should've fought back (harder)." On and on. Almost every single thing that people, including myself, have raised concerns about and explained in long, explicit detail. Here. Don't take my word for it. https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/16888661/
THIS is the fucking issue. If you do not see or understand that after having read all this—if you do not see what is wrong in telling a victim of rape and/or sexual assault that what happened to them was THEIR FAULT because of some extenuating and ultimately irrelevant and/or completely nonexistence circumstance—then I cannot help you.
I'm not discussing this matter any further with anyone else unless they want to engage in a good faith and honest discussion. I am tired of going out of my way to be abundantly kind to people who don't deserve it, and being abundantly thorough in my explanations to people who do not care to read it. I am tired of talking to people who have nothing new to add to the conversation except to chirp away with the same braindead talking points, only to turn around and call ME stupid for engaging with them and engaging with this stupid disappointment of a webtoon more than they could ever hope to. I am betting my bottom dollar they will not read any of this—that even if they do, they will leave a comment along the lines of "why are you taking it so seriously" "why did you write a novel about this" "i'm not reading all of that" "you're wrong lol". That's fine. I am writing it for you, just as much as I'm writing it for myself. I've already lost faith in you.
Anyway! That aside, I am genuinely interested in talking about all the ways Jinx doesn't work as a narrative. I think I'm a bigger fan of this story than its actual so-called fans. See, I'm not afraid to admit that. I really do see it as a story that could've done some interesting things but just repeatedly fumbled the bag. And while I think things could turn for the better, I have many doubts about this author's ability to properly pull off a satisfying ending. We'll see. But I want to talk about where it is/what it's done as of now so far.
How many readers here have been to or graduated from university? Just curious.
I'm currently living a very miserable life in university
Are you curious because of your research on how readers view SA in manhwas?
Incredibly relatable content
Hmmm what does it matter to you? I’m just a silly, overly morally righteous troll who can’t separate fiction from reality, right? I got curious because I wanted to see if all my time spent in those ivory towers of higher ed studying writing and literature is what’s causing some of the fundamental disconnect in approaches and understandings of those approaches to this work.
I asked because I assumed you wanted to know for research purposes. If you are using the info you collect for research, then you should be clearly telling readers that before you ask the question.
Definitely for research purposes
Well, I’m not. If I were I indeed would’ve clarified that but, like I said, I am just curious because of the aforementioned reasons. Though I have thought about using the various discussions I have had with people as data, I’m a bit too lazy to consciously and deliberately collect anything right now, much less break down and categorize it…
What, now we care about ethics? In the first place you’re all already anonymous by virtue of your usernames, I doubt anyone here is using their real names. You’d possibly be rendered even more anonymous by stripping you of your usernames altogether and referring to you as “user 1, user 2, user 3” etc. All the info here is also publicly available, so it wouldn’t be as if I’d privately recorded an interview containing sensitive information and released it to the public without my interviewee knowing…hell, someone else entirely could do this kind of thing and factor me and my responses into it as well.
The other thing that would make research like that a bit challenging is determining how genuine people’s answers are, although if I was conducting more formal interviews or putting out a more formal questionnaire—well I did attempt something like the latter before—that might change a bit. Still, there’d be something worthwhile in how people responded regardless, and conclusions you could draw from them, even if that conclusion is ultimately that they didn’t take the line of inquiry seriously
That’s true, most people are anonymous on these types of sites. Research can be done on anonymous data with certain expectations, such as having a low level of engagement with users. A researcher who has a high level could direct the data in their favour, and it impacts consent from an ethical standpoint. It ultimately depends on the approval of the ethics committee your research is affiliated with. An issue is that it’s highly unlikely that researchers who have a fairly high level of engagement and are anonymous are going to admit that. Another issue, as you pointed out, is the truthfulness of the data you collect. Things like this is why I view some peer-reviewed research with skepticism.