If an author writes a story with rape on it, it doesn't mean they have that kink. The same way an author who writes about murder is fantasizing of killing someone. Not all story is for everyone. Its okay if you don't like it, just move on and don't bother the author and the readers.
but if an author writes about romanticized abuse of any type, then i will assume its a kink or fantasy. sapphics lover
We don't know the author personally and what's going on in their mind and how they came up with the story. Unless we know them personally, all our comments are just opinions and not the truth.
What u consider romanticizied abuse might not be the same for another. Its subjective. All art is. I_be_crying
no thats not how this works. its either romanticized or it isnt, its not subjective. the author ether portrays dark themes seriously and realistically and with the appropriate gravity and consequences or they dont. dark romance is a genre thats romanticizes abuse as the perpetrator and victim end up together all lovey dovey happy ending. now why would someone write a dark romance? i can only make a logical assumption on that, an educated guess if you will. and that would be because they want to live out a fantasy.
no thats not how this works.its either romanticized or it isnt, its not subjective.the author ether portrays dark themes seriously and realistically and with the appropriate gravity and consequences or they don... sapphics lover
This is an art form. Just like painting, poetry etc. Ppl have depicted rape and abuse in almost all forms and there have been ppl who find it tasteful and some that find it disgusting. Subjective. At the end of the day everyone knows that abuse is bad. How an artist chooses to depict it is up to them. Thankfull they put warnings so ppl can avoid it or read it willingly
This is an art form. Just like painting, poetry etc. Ppl have depicted rape and abuse in almost all forms and there have been ppl who find it tasteful and some that find it disgusting. Subjective. At the end of... I_be_crying
not all depictions of rape and abuse in "art" have the same intention or purpose. in fact most depictions of abuse in fiction are treated seriously.
but when you write/draw about a toxic relationship that ends happy and disregards any sort of phycological or realistic effect as well as narrative integrity, what is the purpose of that? dark sexual fantasy most likely. and its no secret that pornography is used as an artistic outlet for sexual fantasies. im not even saying thats necessarily a bad thing, im just making a point that there is an objective distinction between depiction of abuse in art and depiction of romanticized abuse in art.
not all depictions of rape and abuse in "art" have the same intention or purpose.in fact most depictions of abuse in fiction are treated seriously.but when you write/draw about a toxic relationship that ends ha... sapphics lover
You're right, some ppl make art of abuse to glorify/fetishize it. Its only solidly confirmed when the artist themself speaks up about about their work but until then we can only assume its either a fetish or just another way they chose to depict abuse. I really do understand what u mean because what abusive relationship irl has a genuine happy ending for both victim and abuser? None. But maybe this reoccuring theme of "happy ending" is a way for some artists to cope in their own way. They arent all like this and some authors and artists can be sick individuals Ur not wrong in assuming its romanticizing abuse, but neither are others assuming its something else
If an author writes a story with rape on it, it doesn't mean they have that kink. The same way an author who writes about murder is fantasizing of killing someone.
Not all story is for everyone. Its okay if you don't like it, just move on and don't bother the author and the readers.
but if an author writes about romanticized abuse of any type, then i will assume its a kink or fantasy.
What u consider romanticizied abuse might not be the same for another. Its subjective. All art is.
We don't know the author personally and what's going on in their mind and how they came up with the story. Unless we know them personally, all our comments are just opinions and not the truth.
Well put
no thats not how this works.
its either romanticized or it isnt, its not subjective.
the author ether portrays dark themes seriously and realistically and with the appropriate gravity and consequences or they dont.
dark romance is a genre thats romanticizes abuse as the perpetrator and victim end up together all lovey dovey happy ending.
now why would someone write a dark romance? i can only make a logical assumption on that, an educated guess if you will. and that would be because they want to live out a fantasy.
This is an art form. Just like painting, poetry etc. Ppl have depicted rape and abuse in almost all forms and there have been ppl who find it tasteful and some that find it disgusting. Subjective.
At the end of the day everyone knows that abuse is bad.
How an artist chooses to depict it is up to them. Thankfull they put warnings so ppl can avoid it or read it willingly
not all depictions of rape and abuse in "art" have the same intention or purpose.
in fact most depictions of abuse in fiction are treated seriously.
but when you write/draw about a toxic relationship that ends happy and disregards any sort of phycological or realistic effect as well as narrative integrity, what is the purpose of that? dark sexual fantasy most likely.
and its no secret that pornography is used as an artistic outlet for sexual fantasies.
im not even saying thats necessarily a bad thing, im just making a point that there is an objective distinction between depiction of abuse in art and depiction of romanticized abuse in art.
You're right, some ppl make art of abuse to glorify/fetishize it.
Its only solidly confirmed when the artist themself speaks up about about their work but until then we can only assume its either a fetish or just another way they chose to depict abuse.
I really do understand what u mean because what abusive relationship irl has a genuine happy ending for both victim and abuser? None. But maybe this reoccuring theme of "happy ending" is a way for some artists to cope in their own way.
They arent all like this and some authors and artists can be sick individuals
Ur not wrong in assuming its romanticizing abuse, but neither are others assuming its something else