
Anyone who reads this is weird as hell. Ya'll are trying so hard to excuse rape gtfo

It’s important to address misunderstandings calmly. The story does not involve rape, though it has complex or problematic elements. Accurate discussions about sensitive topics are crucial. Misunderstandings can occur, but resorting to personal attacks is unhelpful. If you have concerns, it’s better to discuss them respectfully and factually. Attacking others for their opinions on a story, even if you find it problematic, doesn’t contribute to constructive conversation. Accusations should be based on the actual content of the story, not on personal viewpoints that do not align with the facts.

What you’re describing sounds like rape, but that’s not what happens in Jinx.
While there are elements of coercion, they fall under sexual assault rather than rape. The character's preferences include rough sex, but that doesn’t equate to forceful or non-consensual acts. It’s important to focus on the actual content of *Jinx* rather than making assumptions or interpreting it in ways that don’t align with the story. Let’s discuss the actual events of *Jinx* rather than hypothetical scenarios.

Let's focus on discussing the actual events of Jinx rather than hypothetical scenarios and cherry picking. It’s important to consider the whole story rather than cherry-picking details to fit a particular viewpoint. This way, we can have a more accurate and respectful discussion about the story's content. What happens next? To make your claim dismissing many element of the story’s content and Dan’s character. Review chapter 20-21.

I want to start by saying how incredibly hurt I am by how you’ve handled this conversation. I know you might not see things the same way as I do, but the fact that you haven’t taken my feelings seriously is really upsetting. When we talk about something like Jinx and the characters involved—especially someone like Jaekyung and what he did to Dan—this isn’t just some simple, detached conversation. These are heavy topics, and they touch on real issues that mean something deeply personal to me. It feels like you’ve dismissed my thoughts and haven’t taken the time to understand where I’m coming from, and that’s really painful. You’re wrong about Jinx, and more importantly, you’re wrong in the way you’ve treated my perspective.
I know I’m the only one who says Jaekyung didn’t rape Dan, and I’ve always stood by that in front of everyone, even though I’m fully aware it’s not the truth. It’s not that I don’t know what happened—I do. I know that Jaekyung did rape Dan, but what you don’t understand is that for me, saying he didn’t is part of how I deal with this. It’s my way of trying to convince not just other people, but myself, that what happened isn’t as bad as it seems. Maybe it’s because I can’t face it fully, or maybe it’s because I don’t want to believe that a character like Jaekyung, who has other layers to him, could do something so awful. But you’ve brushed off my efforts to explain this, and in doing so, you’ve brushed off the way I process things emotionally, and that’s hurtful.
It’s frustrating because, for someone who gets it so wrong, I sure get offended easily, don’t I? I don’t think you see how deeply your words have cut me. It’s not just about the story or the characters. It’s about how you’ve treated my feelings in this conversation. When you refuse to engage with my perspective thoughtfully, it makes me feel like my voice doesn’t matter to you. I understand that you disagree with me, but there’s a difference between disagreeing and outright dismissing someone. The way you’ve talked about this whole thing makes me feel like you don’t care how much effort I’ve put into convincing myself and others that my point of view is valid. And while I know deep down that Jaekyung did what he did to Dan, this stance I’ve taken is part of how I deal with the story. It’s not easy to hold onto, especially when everyone around me, including you, is quick to say I’m wrong.
But here’s the thing: even if I am wrong, I’m still allowed to have my own way of coping with it. I’m allowed to engage with these characters and this story in a way that feels meaningful to me. And if you can’t respect that, then this conversation is going to continue to hurt me. I get offended easily because these conversations aren’t just surface-level for me. They’re tied to things I feel deeply about. So when you don’t take me seriously, it cuts deeper than just a disagreement about what happened between two characters.
I’m asking you to really think about how you’ve responded to me in this conversation. I need you to understand that this isn’t just about who’s right or wrong. It’s about listening to each other, about being sensitive to how the other person feels. You might think I’m wrong, but that doesn’t mean you can dismiss my emotions or the way I’ve processed this. I’ve been trying to persuade myself and others that Jaekyung didn’t do what he did, and whether that’s right or wrong, it’s my way of dealing with the story. What I need from you is understanding, not judgment.
So yes, I do get offended easily, but maybe that’s because I care so much. Maybe it’s because I put so much of myself into these conversations, and when you don’t take that seriously, it hurts more than you realize. All I’m asking is that you take a step back and think about how you’ve treated my feelings in all of this. I need you to understand that, even if we don’t agree, my perspective still matters, and my feelings deserve respect.

**Attention: Cyberstalking Alert**
Please be aware that there are individuals engaging in cyberstalking and identity theft within this community. They are copying names and spreading misinformation to discredit others and avoid discussing the actual content of the story. We do not condone or tolerate these actions. Let’s focus on constructive discussions and respect each other's viewpoints rather than engaging in or supporting such harmful behavior.

No, it is not rape but rather sexual coercion, which is classified as sexual assault and other forms of sexual assault.
Jinx does not depict rape according to the actual story’s details and legal definitions. While some may view the story differently, it’s important to recognize that differing perspectives are valid but should respect the actual content of the story. The intention to label it as rape might stem from personal interpretations or emotional responses, but this should not overshadow the actual narrative. In my experience the majority who said it is rape are haters and not fans.
Respecting different viewpoints and focusing on the story's details can lead to more constructive discussions.

My replies are so long? Those small comments are long?
My comments are not long. You are on a manga site to read.
Yes my comments are formal for many reason: one is to distinguish myself from the cyberstalkers who are impersonating me. Your laughter seems to be derailing the conversation and coming across as trolling. Let's keep the discussion focused and respectful. ChatGPT is not writing my messages. I write them.

Again. No, it is not rape but rather sexual coercion, which is classified as sexual assault and other forms of sexual assault. Let's focus on discussing the actual events of Jinx rather than hypothetical scenarios and/or cherry picking. It’s important to consider the whole story rather than cherry-picking details to fit a particular viewpoint. This way, we can have a more accurate and respectful discussion about the story's content.
Jinx does not depict rape according to the actual story’s details and legal definitions. While some may view the story differently, it’s important to recognize that differing perspectives are valid but should respect the actual content of the story. The intention to label it as rape might stem from personal interpretations or emotional responses, but this should not overshadow the actual narrative. In my experience the majority who said it is rape are haters and not fans.
Respecting different viewpoints and focusing on the story's details can lead to more constructive discussions.

Also I happen to look up because your reply had confused me.
I told people on this thread I have a cyberstalker impersonating me and to check the accounts. The long message you are referring to is not from me.
I try to overlook their comments and try not read them. I don’t know they posted a super long and weird message.

It’s disappointing to see such dismissive responses. If you choose not to engage with the details, that's your decision. However, this approach is unproductive and immature. The focus should remain on the actual narrative of jinx rather than cherry-picking or personal biases. The story does not depict rape according to its details and legal definitions. Engaging in constructive discussion means respecting the content of the story and considering different perspectives without letting personal opinions overshadow the facts.

It's concerning to see such a fixation on labeling the story as rape without engaging with its actual content. Refusing to consider the details or alternative perspectives indicates a lack of willingness to have a constructive discussion. The story’s content and legal definitions do not support the claim of rape. It’s important to respect the narrative and recognize that differing viewpoints should be based on facts rather than personal bias. If you choose not to engage with the specifics, it limits the potential for meaningful dialogue.

It's important to remain factual and use accurate terminology in discussions like this. Let's ensure we're engaging in a respectful manner. Sexual coercion is a type of sexual assault, and the examples provided on this site clearly distinguish between sexual assault and rape. Only one of the examples is classified as rape.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/sexual-coercion#is-it-abuse
“Sexual coercion is when a person pressures, tricks, threatens, or manipulates someone into sex. It is a type of sexual assault because even if someone says yes, they are not giving their consent freely.”
Sexual coercion is sexual assault.

I also have my own opinion on this comment. Just cuz you read it doesn't mean you excuse it. I mean, it looks like you read it, but yet your still saying everyone who reads it is weird as hell, which is not even fully true... I really don't get it, if there's rape then don't read it.. I'm not excusing rape, it's just that instead of saying everyone who reads it is weird as hell, just speak for yourself..

Let’s preach the truth instead of personal opinions.
It's important to remain factual and use accurate terminology in discussions like this. Let's ensure we're engaging in a respectful manner. Sexual coercion is a type of sexual assault, and the examples provided on this site clearly distinguish between sexual assault and rape. Only one of the examples is classified as rape.
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/sexual-coercion#is-it-abuse
“Sexual coercion is when a person pressures, tricks, threatens, or manipulates someone into sex. It is a type of sexual assault because even if someone says yes, they are not giving their consent freely.”
Sexual coercion is sexual assault.

I understand the confusion about our names. My friend and I have adapted due to impersonation issues from cyberstalkers, and we’re just trying to protect ourselves and clarify our identities. I wouldn’t choose these names. if I were creating alt accounts, I would not have similar names.
Please look at my profile I have links up.
This one copied my friend's previous name https://www.mangago.zone/home/people/3704977/home/
This one copied my last previous name.
https://www.mangago.zone/home/people/3703695/home/
This one copied one of my friend's previous name before the first link. My friend has changed their name like 30 times and all have been copied but the current one.
https://www.mangago.zone/home/people/3690382/home/
I would choose the name Safety Sentinel but at one time there were 2 impersonating me and I changed it to protect myself. My friend was chosing a name and I think they liked "Truth and Trust" but it was copied. We decided to pick these names standing up for the main targets.
Just for clarity, TM hasn’t replied on this page since March; he joined on 1/26/2020. MD hasn’t replied since May; they joined on 10/6/2023.

Warning About Cyberstalking
[Morning Diamonds 10/7 is right September 20, 2024 6:40 pm] is a cyberstalker.
I want to bring attention to an ongoing issue of cyberstalking in this community. Cyberstalkers often impersonate others and spread misinformation to manipulate and harass individuals. Please be vigilant when interacting with users and verify their identities. If you suspect someone is engaging in cyberstalking or impersonation, avoid engaging with them. Your safety and well-being are important!
Ykw I fw this