beta
i don't get why people think that the emperor can just punish the queen. he's a king not a tyrant so he can't just do whatever to the queen without solid proof as he'll need solid evidence and proof that the queen did something. and the queen's father leads the nobles as said previously which is also a problem cuz as a king and not a tyrant he'll need Noble's agreement to do something to the queen and they'll only give agreement if the proof is obvious enough that the nobles which are led by the queen's father cannot say anything.