tbh if there’s a twist and kenji and yugo would be the endgame this would be better bc it ain’t gon be that cliche
An Dong might done bad things but emwith toxic people around him like that i can’t even fault him. though i’m pretty (kind of?) sure he won’t hurt chen mu if it all comes down to it
istg why even bother putting khaol as the main lead when author-san is just gonna do this anyway
istg idk why but i really want jooyoung to be the next nux and if some shit will happen in the next chapter that’ll prevent him to be the next nux i’m gonna riot
khaol has love kaveri for a long time and is the reason why he’s the pain of god. ppl can’t really expect khaol to love river at that short period of time. and from the story the author is showing us, river has even more memorable time with heil than khaol. this is so confusing like— what does the author want us to think rn ://
god two red flags won’t shoo me away BUT the second male lead like— are those shits really necessary in these manhwa? that trope is so fucking tiring, please
It’s rare to come across a BL without a second lead ugh. It’s an overused trope. But whatever.
Also I don’t get the author’s mindset for thinking unfaithful tops are worse, it doesn’t make sense cause who’s unfaithful? Ml here isn’t even in a relationship with MC. Let him fuck around if MC can fuck around too.
Exactly???? Ikr? What was that? 'Unfaithful' who? If they're talking about a supposed unsaid relationship that apparently still exists after all this shit then shouldn't it apply to both parties? Why only unfaithful tops are unacceptable but not bottoms? Wth?
Preach. So they can slut shame tops but not bottoms loool, by author logic, uke is unfaithful because he’s sleeping with someone other than ML.
Have you noticed that while different manhwas give people separate chances to slut shame some top and some bottom characters(in many cases they are actually sluts lol, in others they ain't), but when it comes to defending, people usually jump to defend the bottom but less so the top. It's like there's this stereotype engraved in majority brains that the 'bottom' needs to be protected no matter if they're a strong person or even someone who did horrible things like cheating or abetting a crime (in this case). When tops do it they're abused and called out to no end, and rightly so but people just find someone reasoning with the bottom's actions everytime (or that he's just cute, pitiful lol) while if only there was a top instead of a bottom doing anything remotely similar, the same people would react so much more harshly, perhaps because of the same stereotype that a 'top' is stronger and dominant so he is assumed as a must be aggressor and that he'd do worse things in the future. Idk maybe it's just me but I notice a trend. Well apologies for the long af rant. Haha