I wanna see the top refuse the bot, then the bot will get irritated then he will impulsively pull the collar of top then roughly peck the tops lips. Irritated too, the top holds bot's neck then pulls him forward towards him, holds his chin then roughly kiss him with toungeu and all to teach the bot how to truly kiss someone, aggressively and roughly. Hehehehe
I just skimmed the whole manhua but can someone point out or explain what part or chapter you saw or read about that has pedophilia in it? Is it between the ML and shou? Or shou and ML's father?
Maybe with the ML's father. But if they are talking about how ML was 22 and MC was 7 THEN and calling it pedophile even tho right now ML really said several times he didn't see Soorim as such and only see him as a kid he used to know, Idk lol also, MC now is already 20 y.o ML also was just saying things like he would sleep with him if he gained weight so MC would stop asking or whining. Soooo idk.. is it pedophile if the MC already in his 20? I thought pedophile only work if the kid underage 18 lol
A lot of underage readers.
Istg they write the most disgusting stuff.
Totally dissuades you from reading, thinking it's pedo. Btw, have you read it yet? Don't just skim it. I read it and it's so good I had to go look up the raws.
Btw, the one who's doing the "seducing" is the younger bottom. Soorim. So even if "pedo" it's not even from the much older top. And btw, Idk why they said pedo when the kid is CLEARLY OF Age. He was said to be 20. Except he's still carrying around a teddy bear so....mentally he could be (more of) a child. But aside from that he's legally (biologically) and adult. And when they had first known e/o they were acquaintances/and not for long. He was either kidnapped or abandoned by his mom...for whatever reason...and they didn't see e/o for 10 years....when they met there was no grooming or sexual relationships of any kind. Wookyung only sees him as a child and continues to do so, treating him as a child even after they'd reunited. I don't understand why KIDS are reading this stuff and saying it's pedo. Yeah. A lot of kids are uneducated. It's sad really. And why are they even on here reading adult mats?!?
A lot of people are really misusing this is term. Ml was not attracted to mc when he's was a child they only wanted to protect the mc and the mother but they hind somewhere far away. When they met again the mc's not a child anymore, although he acts kinda childish but what do ppl expect fir someone who's kidnapped since he's a child and doesn't have proper guidance and childhood. And even as of now the ml does not have any interest with the mc. The comment you've read might be another episode of readers who don't actually read and likes to spout out words that perhaps they don't really understand just to idk feel morally high ground lol
To groom or 'grooming' a person, you have to dress someone to your liking/taste, not just the physical aspect but also mentally, their attitude, their taste, hobbies etc.. Just like a dress-up game, or an AI Chat between you and an AI, you mold them to your liking, to your type of guy/woman.
I think what the ML did was manipulate the MC into liking him or just to let him be aware of his (ML) feelings. There's no 'grooming' here.
Sometimes we have to broaden/learn/understand more the meaning of some words because we carry it in our real lives, we are inputting it in our brains, adding it tour knowledge. Especially in today's world where we get misunderstood/judge by saying and doing something slightly weird or uncommon.
Nice explanation
No? Grooming in reference to pedophiles is specifically the 2nd thing you said, manipulating a young impressionable mind into liking them romantically and seeing them as a sexual partner.
It's also complete nonsense. I can't imagine where they even came up with that definition. Smh
After talking with A Satan's partisan, I learned something, they rely on wordly sophistry a lot. I am sorry to inform you, MC was groomed. How about, just asking Google? We are not lacking of concise, straightforward and accurate definitions there. It really takes less than 15sec to research that rather than taking 5 min to write this misinformed comment.
Ugh
So tired of people like you. 6 years gap is NOT GROOMING. People like you keep using words they shouldn't making a mess for others that don't understand.
The question was, did the ML groom the MC or not? Then my answer was No, thus my explanation. There's a big difference with "Sexually Grooming" to "Grooming" I just literally gave my perspective on the word.
P.S. I know what the translator is implying to, okay?
You can't be serious
You guys can do the debate or argument, In my case, I knew how to separate fictions from reality, it's no problem for me if you read whatever actually, its one of my new year resolutions, to let people do their thing and have their own perceptions on what they read, what's important is that you know how to separate fictions from reality