Okay this was so hot and Ilay's expressions? Just wonderful! The artist deserves a raise. I love dirty talk and when the top claims the bottom as theirs. Ahhh I've been waiting so long for this! The scene from my pfp is coming soon, I can't wait!
Poor Taeui tho but don't worry my love you'll be okay and eventually happy. There's nothing Ilay wouldn't do for Taeui. He's just figuring out his feelings at the moment.
Olgami my beloved. I'm so happy there are eng translations. Thank you so much translators! I have no idea if webtoon will show the side stories but at least we have this. Oh I experienced a rollercoaster of emotions. I love how Chae Ah is reaching out to Yunsu this time. This is probably the first time she's made a move on her own. I'm glad their relationship this time seems to be going at her pace. They are still as hot as ever and the tension between them is immaculate. I hope we get even more steamy scenes. I want these two to be together already but this fits them. They wouldn't be Chae Ah and Yunsu otherwise.
Please author let us atleast have many side stories and a clear resolution this time. I love the ending too but I want them happy together
Since so many of you apparently don't know how to google, I've copied the entry on pedophilia on wiki word to word. Read this.
Pedophilia (alternatively spelled paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.[1][2]: vii Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12,[3] psychiatric diagnostic criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for prepubescence to age 13.[4] People with the disorder are often referred to as pedophiles (or paedophiles).
Pedophilia is a paraphilia. In recent versions of formal diagnostic coding systems such as the DSM-5 and ICD-11, "pedophilia" is distinguished from "pedophilic disorder." Pedophilic disorder is defined as a pattern of pedophilic arousal accompanied by either subjective distress or interpersonal difficulty, or having acted on that arousal. The DSM-5 requires that a person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child or children they are aroused by, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilic disorder. Similarly, the ICD-11 excludes sexual behavior among post-pubertal children who are close in age. The DSM requires the arousal pattern must be present for 6 months or longer, while the ICD lacks this requirement. The ICD criteria also refrain from specifying chronological ages.[5]
In popular usage, the word pedophilia is often applied to any sexual interest in children or the act of child sexual abuse, including any sexual interest in minors below the local age of consent or age of adulthood, regardless of their level of physical or mental development.[1][2]: vii [6] This use conflates the sexual attraction to prepubescent children with the act of child sexual abuse and fails to distinguish between attraction to prepubescent and pubescent or post-pubescent minors.[7][8] Such use should be avoided, because although some people who commit child sexual abuse are pedophiles,[6][9] child sexual abuse offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children,[7][10][11] and many pedophiles do not molest children.[12]
There are citations and sources on wiki for those who wish to know more. I'm begging you all to know the meaning of words before you use them. And please calling someone a pedophile, a pedophile defender, pedophile liker, creep and what not is defamation of character, you could get in real legal trouble for that.
This is exactly what I was talking about. Do you have any basis for your claim? I could sue you for defamation you fool. Get some fucking education.
Here I'll copy this again:-
In popular usage, the word pedophilia is often applied to any sexual interest in children or the act of child sexual abuse, including any sexual interest in minors below the local age of consent or age of adulthood, regardless of their level of physical or mental development.[1][2]: vii [6] This use conflates the sexual attraction to prepubescent children with the act of child sexual abuse and fails to distinguish between attraction to prepubescent and pubescent or post-pubescent minors.[7][8] Such use should be avoided, because although some people who commit child sexual abuse are pedophiles,[6][9] child sexual abuse offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children,[7][10][11] and many pedophiles do not molest children.[12]
Lol. What I gotcha! Whatever will I do in the face of such astounding logic! Oh no! Poor me. Yes you internet stranger who doesn't know what a pedo is but when someone tells you what it is you call them a pedo. Logic has left the chat. Just say you can't read. All of you calling me pedo without any basis, did you get any education? You stupid bitch first educate yourself before screaming online and accusing people. Again this is defamation and could get you sued irl.
Here I'll be kind to direct you
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia
And if you can't read or understand simple words ask an adult to help you.
You're just repeating the same tiring nonsense everyone's already said to me before you. You're not the first and you won't be the last but that won't change the truth. Accusing anyone to be pedophiles who's presenting facts. You're worse than a child. Even a 5 yr old will know the difference when it's explained to them. Maybe seek to help from a doctor then they'll also be able to explain to you what a pedo is. Maybe that'll get your thick head out of your ass and you'll believe them
Lmao. This is from the wiki article:
In popular usage, the word pedophilia is often applied to any sexual interest in children or the act of child sexual abuse, including any sexual interest in minors below the local age of consent or age of adulthood, regardless of their level of physical or mental development.[1][2]: vii [6] This use conflates the sexual attraction to prepubescent children with the act of child sexual abuse and fails to distinguish between attraction to prepubescent and pubescent or post-pubescent minors.[7][8] Such use should be avoided, because although some people who commit child sexual abuse are pedophiles,[6][9] child sexual abuse offenders are not pedophiles unless they have a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children,[7][10][11] and many pedophiles do not molest children.[12]
I've already written this above. You wouldn't have written your stupid comment if you'd read what I'd written first. Friendly advice, next time don't make a clown of yourself and read before replying.
Since @son of third has me blocked I'll reply to your comment on their post here.
Misusing terms like pedophile and pedophilia trivializes them. It's like calling an apple an orange. And instead of rectifying their mistake or educating themselves they attacked me. I didn't even say anything about the story for fucks sake! But yeah thanks for giving your thoughts who knows maybe since you're a psychology student they'll believe you unlike me or maybe you'd be called a pedo too and if that's the case then welcome to the club!
The term you're looking for is statutory rape since the ml also hasn't shown any sexual attraction to post pubescent children (because if he had he'd have also thought about having sex with him but he only thought of killing him). He changed his tactics only when he realized simply killing mc isn't "fun". So it can't be ephebophila. Also child predators aren't always sexually attracted to children or minors, most of the times it's a form of violence or to exert dominance and/or control over their victim which is most likely the case here. I also think ml is grooming the mc towards a purpose so that it'd be more "fun" to kill him later.
Like I get their point about other ppl in the internet used it as an umbrella term or something BUT it's not wrong for others to give correction too specially if it's for education purpose or just providing info. So, I am disappointed but not surprised when ppl in the internet gets butt hurt when someone's just providing info. idk why they get easily riled up to the point of randomly accusing people which doesn't help at all. They should be talking about the topic instead calling ppl random accusations without proof, cuz they would end up looking like a fool who doesn't wanted to be educated and does not really care cuz if they truly care they should at least be interested and open minded about the right usage of terms like this, I admit I sometimes misused words like this but I won't go throwing accusations on someone who's trying to correct me
Yes I think that's the term that I was talking about and I agree some child predators and even those who rape other ppl aren't always sexually attracted to the victims some (or most ) of them wanted to "practice" their dominance, it seems like they wanna prove to themselves that they are powerful over the victim I sometimes wonder that maybe this is the reason why most of their victims are children and women.
The author is so poetic, I loved this ending