
Tbh I always felt like it was a bad decision for the MC to treat Eclis that way. Like use him until the end if you need to, but discarding him like this esp since she knows Yvonne is manipulating him, is just handing her a strong card (MC knows Eclis' value as a Sword master) and letting him become a liability.

I don't like this fated past lover thing.
Like I don't need things to go into such a big scale. What does it add to the characters?
And idk, I feel like it's less interesting to see characters' journey when "it's just fated" :/
Edit: except for titles like Frosty where it's the whole point of the storyline.
Edit 2: and I feel like the same thing is happening to Death is the only ending for the villainess.... TT-TT

This makes no sense at all. Between the big anachronisms (the Queen's necklace, the guillotine, etc.), the useless characters (Napoleon, Robespierre & Fersen), the ones that could be more fleshed out like Cagliostro, and so on.
It was great at the start but it went completely off rail when they started talking about Joan. And why characters like Bal and the goo even exist ?
Not them praising him for making one of the easiest shot I've seen in pool
I couldn't take it srly
Ahh yeeesss the glazer