They don't look good together. Like why would a actor be interested in him. It's not like potato liked him or actor liked potato. There are no reason as to why these two would be a pair. It doesn't make any sense. And their sexual dynamic is not even hot.
damn, didnt it like so much that you had to state it twice
Im scrreaamiiingggg
He should choose hari or nari. But what the fck. Why does he fck the blonde girl. Like why??? Hari is perfect for him. Nari is very gf material. But nari is a hoe. She stole hari's bf.
They don't look good together. Like why would an actor be interested in him. It's not like potato liked him or actor liked potato. There are no reason as to why these two would be a pair. It doesn't make any sense. And their sexual dynamic is not even hot.
So...? Do you think you're the one that compatible with the actor?
Lmaoo
Omg hahahah
My friend was interested in their ship but as soon as Potato did a 180 after sex and how it went... he is not interested anymore.
Yeah, that's a weird relationship, in the end it's just séx, my heart wasn't beating of excitement xD. I was just trying to finish the chapter quickly to be honest
Lol such nastiness you so stupid. Instead, argue or go back to drinking from your bottle.
please have respectful dialogue. That comment you are commenting to is just a ridiculous strawman argument. I avoid that as it will not have any respectful dialogue to engage. Maybe you could express yourself without attacking them?
Yeah but who's talking to you?
Weird question. Many talk to me.
I'm attacking the attacker man.
Weird how you're not directing your moral lessons to this comment tho "So...? Do you think you're the one that compatible with the actor?"
Safety acknowledged you were attacking a person trollig
Safety explained it was a ridiculous strawman argument. It is a troll looking for attention. A “moral” lesson would never work on that type of person.
Safety was telling you, you were wasting your time and energy on that. If you wanted to respond there are other ways to respond instead of feeding them. Safety was helping you not fall for stupid tactics of a person seeking attention.
Safety said they would not respond to it because it wouldn’t have any respectful dialogue
Yet, responded to you thinking it would be a respectful conversation. You were handle at a different standard as if you were a decent human being instead of seeking attention or harming others.
Woooooaw Nice I won't read it
That Shiki has to be trolling.
Pourquoi ? Parce que j'ai défendu poutysun?
Dw I get you. I will never understand people and their obsession with playing the moral police to someone who attacks the attacker. Like if someone says something rude and if I'm rude to them, suddenly I'm at fault? Like this shit doesn't make sense. They always go after the person who gives the rude shit a taste of their own medicine but will leave the rude shit alone
Your comment doesn’t correlate with what is happening here. And you know Shiki has been attacking me and my friends, we have not attacked Shiki or was rude to them. We just stop talking to them as they are falsely accusing us as you have falsely accused us here. You are misrepresenting our comments for your agenda.
You have heard don’t feed the trolls. That “rude” comment was just trolling.
@everyone, consider the name [Hakdugfarttt]—The name "Hakdugfarttt" strongly suggests trolling behavior. Names like this are often chosen to provoke a reaction or to be deliberately absurd, which is a common tactic used by trolls. The content of their comment further supports this, as it seems designed to derail the conversation rather than contribute meaningfully.
Consider their comment is a classic example of trolling.
An internet troll, or online bully, is someone who intentionally tries to upset, offend, or cause trouble for others online. Trolls post inflammatory or offensive messages on social media, forums, newsgroups, chat rooms, and online games.
Responding to trolls often just fuels their behavior, and attacking the attacker only perpetuates the cycle. It doesn’t help. Shielded was trying to help Shiki understand that engaging with trolls in a respectful and constructive manner, or not engaging at all, is more effective.
We aim for respectful dialogue and avoid feeding into the negativity. By refraining from responding to the troll, we hoped to keep the discussion respectful and focused on the actual topic. Engaging with trolls is unproductive.
However, if they had a different name their message it would led me to think something else. The comment "So...? Do you think you're the one that compatible with the actor?" appears to be dismissive and intended to provoke a reaction rather than contribute constructively to the discussion. It doesn’t address the original post's content and instead seems to aim at mocking the original poster's opinion.
While it could be seen as a joke, in the context of a serious discussion, it undermines the original post and can derail the conversation. Addressing it calmly and refocusing on the topic is the best approach to maintain a respectful dialogue. It is not a direct attack as this situation has make it out to be.
@PersistentQuill stay away from me you paranoid stalker. Did you search for my comments just to harass me? Are you going to respond to every manhua I'm going to comment too?
Hey Shielded,
I've noticed that Shiki is escalating the situation by accusing me of being a paranoid stalker and harassing them. It's ridiculous because I've been trying to avoid any contact with them since they started to falsely accuse me and attack us. I blocked them because of their behavior.
We both happened to respond to the same two topics on a public forum, and now they're claiming I'm stalking them when I never knew they existed before today. I think they're deflecting their own behavior onto me since they've been harassing us and picking fights with everyone. Who picks a fight with someone who defended or tried to help them? It's sad.
Since we stopped talking to them and blocked them, they have interjected themselves into the conversation when there was no direct interaction. For example, I made a direct comment to them at 9:04 pm, and then at 9:17 pm, I only talked to you, avoiding their comment, and after that they interjected with a question. I avoided them again and blocked them. It's now 8:35 am, meaning we have been avoiding Shiki for 11 hours. Shiki's claims are impossible and show they are targeting us.
It seems like they're trying to provoke a reaction and are possibly part of that hate group that's been targeting us. Today, I've only posted to Jinx as this is my Jinx-only account and defended Shiki in the past, but they continue to attack and gaslight. I'm planning to avoid engaging with them further and focus on respectful discussions. What do you think?
My last comment to Shiki was on that topic at 9:09 pm. From the timestames that is my last direct message to Shiki.
I
https://www.mangago.zone/home/mangatopic/16637303/?page=3
If you look at page 3, that is the only comment to Shiki as the other comments are to different people and Shiki tries to talk to me and Green Leaf.
I1 hours of avoiding Shiki who has been trying to talk to us and now shows every one they are falsely accusing us and targeting us.
I've been avoiding them for 11 hours. Almost twelve hours. Despite this, Shiki keeps trying to talk to me and Green Leaf, falsely accusing us and targeting us. This behavior clearly shows they're harassing us and not the other way around. Their accusations are baseless and seem to be an attempt to provoke a reaction.
Girl wtf is your problem? No one's even talking to you and so what if they're "trolling"?? We dgaf if they're trolling or not stop using that as an excuse when people get mad reasonably and mind your own business tf
@everyone, it seems like the comment I'm responding to is trying to provoke me and twist the situation to make me look like the aggressor. Their response is dismissive and aggressive, indicating they might be trying to escalate the fake conflict.
I pointed out how their comment about "moral police" didn't correlate with what was happening. They falsely accused us and misrepresented our comments. I was defending my friend and myself from their accusations. Now, they're saying I should mind my own business, and their "excuse" part doesn't make sense. The advice they give me, they should take for themselves, as none of their comments here were helpful or constructive.
Their responses don't make sense in the context of our discussion. They were talking about me and my friend, and Shiki tried to engage with me after that, showing their claims are baseless. I have the right to defend myself and others against false accusations.
It's clear Choco is trying to gaslight and use strawman arguments to deflect the real issue. They're attempting to make it look like I'm in the wrong for defending myself against false accusations. It seems they're trying to shift the blame onto me instead of owning they were wrong.