It’s weird how people will defend it so much as if the intention isn’t clear. The only excuse I’ve hear for like 300 year old characters looking like they’re 10 is that it’s fine because they are actually old. But the characters were clearly written with the intention of being appealing to the readers sexually or otherwise regardless of the fact that they ACT like they’re from elementary school. Like it’s not just the looks— the characters are often also childish mentally
Yea it's so overused and badly used like I think an old woman who looks like a child forever is a cool concept to explore and write about but usually it's just a child because if it looks like a child, acts like a child and talks like a child it's probably a child. I heard this one video that argued that it opens a conversation for talking about how we view stories https://youtu.be/SGVZkmz0ENo?si=RO_T1MwtSt-5c5lF .
Ahh yes. Looks like child but it's 200 years old so it's ok even though it looks like child porn troupe. Yall not fooling no one.
It’s weird how people will defend it so much as if the intention isn’t clear. The only excuse I’ve hear for like 300 year old characters looking like they’re 10 is that it’s fine because they are actually old. But the characters were clearly written with the intention of being appealing to the readers sexually or otherwise regardless of the fact that they ACT like they’re from elementary school. Like it’s not just the looks— the characters are often also childish mentally
Yea it's so overused and badly used like I think an old woman who looks like a child forever is a cool concept to explore and write about but usually it's just a child because if it looks like a child, acts like a child and talks like a child it's probably a child. I heard this one video that argued that it opens a conversation for talking about how we view stories
https://youtu.be/SGVZkmz0ENo?si=RO_T1MwtSt-5c5lF .