Theory: I think Aryka is Yoen's brother, and that Aryka was also part of the accident. So now he's dead or in a coma for a very long time. If he's still in a coma, I think that would explain why he still has his human feelings, making him diff from others. Coz others are already dead, while he's still fighting for his life??
I dunno, I just dwelled too much on the difference between Aryka and Yoen as it is often brought up in the story. Plus when Yoen said that he and his brother are very opposite. I just thought that maybe it's foreshadowing or something like that. (〜 ̄△ ̄)〜
I think Aryka is Yoen's brother, and that Aryka was also part of the accident. So now he's dead or in a coma for a very long time. If he's still in a coma, I think that would explain why he still has his human feelings, making him diff from others. Coz others are already dead, while he's still fighting for his life??
I dunno, I just dwelled too much on the difference between Aryka and Yoen as it is often brought up in the story. Plus when Yoen said that he and his brother are very opposite. I just thought that maybe it's foreshadowing or something like that. (〜 ̄△ ̄)〜
Really liking this theory!
We had scene from Aryka's dream where he was pushed on the ground while holding books and after that saw Vince. Place seemed like school hall. Yeon's brother was bed ridden, but what if he wanted to be as everyone else and tried to sneak into the school (Idk if it's possible due to his illness, but there's still slight chance).
Or maybe he indeed was part of an accident himself. Especially since Aryka was warned that not all things from previous life are always great. It kinda was hinted that he may did something he won't be proud of when he finds out through dreaming.
But anyway, I'm super excited for next chapters!
You're right, that's possible too! And maybe Aryka met Vince because of Yoen too?? Like maybe when he saw them together or something, then he got curious.
Oh yaas, I got intrigue with that part where they discussed previous life/memories too! I was thinking what if Aryka was the reason for Yoen's death. If that would be the case, I think that will be the dilemma between Vince and Aryka. Urgh, I'm really excited for the next chaps too!! I can't wait for the plot twist! ヾ(☆▽☆)
Thank you for the update!! I can't help but scream omg, they are so adorable!! ⁄(⁄ ⁄·⁄ω⁄·⁄ ⁄)⁄
Anyway, to anyone who isn't satisfied with KSB, you guys are free to read some other mangas hehehe. Why still read KSB if it doesn't suit your taste? Just let other people enjoy things, okie? Also, this is not to spread hate, I'm just saying. Peace out y'all. ٩(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)۶
Hello! You have a good point, they may do that since I am just merely suggesting. At the end of the day, no one will have the power over us. You do you. Also, yes there are people who give constructive criticism, tho there are also some people who are commenting just to spread hate and disgust (saw some here before). I mean, it seemed to me that they didn't really understand the manga at all. This is just on me, but if you really hate it then at least do/read something else that will make you happier. At least the negativity on earth will also be reduced. Again, that's just on me. Have a nice day! :)
Professionally published work doesn't necessarily mean good work, please you can't be that naive.
Anyone with a functioning brain is qualified to give constructive criticism on anything, anytime and anywhere. Does that mean the author herself has to listen to it? Of course not. But artistic work conveys emotions so people will always react to it, pirate website or not.
I never said it being professionally published meant it was good. You're the one who is naive. I'm giving you the literal definition of constructive criticism. https://www.definitions.net/definition/CONSTRUCTIVE+CRITICISM
"constructive criticism noun
Criticism performed with a compassionate attitude towards the person qualified for criticism."
Just saying "this manga sucks because of these reasons" on a random pirate site does not constructive criticism make. It has to be to the author so they can take action on said criticism.
"Just saying "this manga sucks because of these reasons" on a random pirate site does not constructive criticism make."
You might need to get your eyesight checked because no one said that. And while you're at it, read that definition again, you clearly need it more than me.
And no, constructive criticism doesn't need to be made directly to the author. Following that "logic" , almost no one would be allowed to comment on anything. Professional critics working for newspapers and magazines would also be out of work.
This might be how it goes in your head, but this is not how the real world works.
AWW, THAT'S SO NICE.