
I fell in love with the mc's succubus friend and now I'm upset she's into men a lil lesbian side couple with mlm and wlw friendship would have been nice

I agree on the part where it's untrue that straight people can get suppressed.
However, I don't think FruityRice used it as in that context you have said. I think FruityRice just used it as context that doesn't related to real life serious situation such as people get suppressed due to (name). I dunno if you ever noticed but sometimes you would see "The story is so funny but Im upset that this is not BL" or "This plot is great but Im upset it's BL genre" in comment section of tiktok(Idk about other social media) and here.
Hence, there will be small war under that comment such as "That so homophobia" under 'upset cuz it's BL' and vice versa. So, I think get FruityRice probably want to do the 'vice versa' one.
Ofc I dont know FruityRice real context using anti straight word but I feel it's doesn't make sense for them to used the word in the context you have said cuz we're in BL genre story comment section.

My guy just because someone comment. Oh I wish this was a BL does not mean that straight people get suppressed they’re just stating their preference and being straight up delusional and even in this original comment that started this chatting chain in their comment even they admit that they’re just being delusional and how does that affect people in the real world so what is a comment gonna do nothing so stop being a delusional heterophobia doesn’t exist

I don't think every phobia need to be attach as in context they get suppressed. Ofc you deny the word heterophobia just because your opinion on (name)phobia context is they need to get suppressed to own the label '(name)phobia' as requirement. However I dont think (name)phobia all about people need to get suppressed. Tbh it's sound hypocrisy for you deny such word don't exist just because they don't get suppressed to get that phobia name while homophobic people also deny LGBT and call them delusional for that tok. (unless that's your goal in this conversation tho it's kinda weird. If not nevermind then..)

Definitions and Historical Context:
Heterophobia, coined by combining the Greek word "hetero" (meaning different) and "phobia" (meaning fear), suggests a fear or hatred towards heterosexual individuals. However, it is crucial to distinguish between individual biases and systemic discrimination. Historically, heterosexual individuals have not faced systemic oppression based on their sexual orientation, which sets them apart from marginalized groups such as LGBTQ+ individuals.

Power Dynamics and Structural Inequality:
Heterosexism, which refers to the dominance of heterosexuality in society, is often mistakenly equated with heterophobia. Heterosexism encourages the privileging of heterosexual relationships, norms, and institutions, resulting in advantages for heterosexual individuals that are not available to those with different sexual orientations. Nonetheless, this socio-cultural preference does not result in discrimination towards heterosexuals, but rather illustrates the perpetuation of unequal power dynamics.

Individual Prejudice and Isolated Cases:
Instances of individual prejudice against heterosexual individuals do occur, but they are isolated events rather than systemic discrimination. Isolated instances of bias are not representative of a widespread social issue like heterophobia. Prejudice against heterosexuals is more likely rooted in specific personal experiences or interactions and should not be used to delegitimize the lived experiences of marginalized groups who face systematic discrimination.

Marginalization and Violence:
Strikingly, the absence of credible data or empirical evidence regarding violence or legal discrimination against heterosexual individuals further undercuts the existence of heterophobia. While isolated cases of violence against any individual should be condemned and addressed, it would be misleading to claim that heterosexual individuals experience similar levels of marginalization and violence as marginalized communities.

Inclusivity and Collaboration:
Maintaining a just and inclusive society requires us to address the concerns of all individuals. By recognizing the absence of heterophobia as a systemic form of discrimination, we can focus on building bridges of understanding and empathy among diverse communities. Recognizing and supporting minority groups in their pursuit of equal rights does not diminish or harm the rights of heterosexual individuals.

While it is essential to acknowledge and address any form of prejudice or discrimination faced by any individual, claiming that heterophobia is a pervasive, systemic issue is misguided. The challenges faced by heterosexual individuals can be attributed to isolated incidents or biases rather than systematic oppression. Fostering an inclusive society requires recognizing and rectifying existing power imbalances without creating a false narrative of discrimination that undermines the struggles of marginalized communities

The heterophobia comment in no way was used as way to mean straight people get suppressed too. And the phobia used in their comment was not related to systemic discrimination in general. Homophobia can mean" having or showing a dislike of or prejudice against gay people" as well as "extreme fear of" homophobia used today is no longer used to identify someone who fears homos but it is used for people who dislike or overall hate them.
For if we dissect the original comment the "not the" can is obviously the start of a joke and should not be taken seriously, but it did. You claim that straight people cannot be oppressed is wrong when taken under thought straight people include people of various backgrounds,nationality and race, religion etc, which means that they are also part of marginalized groups and can face suppression like people of the lgbtq community. But it seems that you used that you cannot be marginalized if your sexuality is straight which is true if we remove everything from a person except their straight sexuality, they therefore cannot be discriminated or marginalized against.
Since the original comment never mentioned systematic discrimination this should only be about individual biases supported by the original post which was their preference which means the following subjects should've been about individual biases. And on your talk about violence one's does have a slight increase when you are of lgbtq origin but that crime would go under hate crime because you are targeted because of said origin where those can be called homophobic. Where in general crime violence being straight or lgbtq doesn't matter you will have that same chance of being targeted, especially if you are female and or look more feminine, your orientation/biology will not stop someone if they have a goal.
Being heterophobic does exist in both phobic definition contexts such as someone non hetero can have extreme fear of hetero people if they are in a hostile environment toward the lgbtq community and or if they are in fear of hate crimes, as well as having dislike and repulsion toward hetero people which is directly linked back to individual bias.
Being or having a phobia does not automatically mean that they are suppressed or a victim of discrimination. Overall the comment was taken and blown way out of proportion and was no mention of systematic discrimination. Heterophobia may not have been the best choice of word because people take it as hetero suppression and believe that it means "straight people can be oppressed too" when in fact is the bias one has when prefering something hetero to not be like the original post.
Overall I do not want to undermine what people of the lgbtq have faced especially both individual and systematic discrimination and marginalization, but I believe that the comment was stretched and words were thrown in that were related to what they meant. I believe hetero distaste, hetero disapproval, or hetero dislike would have been a better choice of words given the context and was not meant to attack the original poster for preferring lgbtq character sexuality over straight ones (probably judging), given that we all came from literally reading the last chapter of this BL incubus webtoon.

I read until chapter 8 but there was a mention of another person the ml was in love with and I need to know before continuing is it a completely different person than mc or was it mc in the past?? (I'm thinking mc and ml knew each other but then mc dies and gets reincarnated to his current body idk)
Yeah I definetly prefer mc with the ex based on the raws (don't know korean)
Same