![](https://pic1.mangapicgallery.com/r/avatar/be/u1497420_50x50.jpg?2)
He practically blackmailed Lee Nan syaing that he wouldnt let Nan find another job unless he hasd sex with him. Is this not blackmail rape? Lee Nan wouldnt have been able to go to the cops since he had no evidence and even if he did the guy hes up against is practically a chaebol. Does this mean that my homeboy Yiyeon is a rapist? I genuinely gotta ask because im not eductaed on the standards of blackmail rape
![](https://pic1.mangapicgallery.com/r/avatar/d0/u1351062_50x50.jpg?2)
Just want to clarify something, blackmail is "the action of demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return for not revealing compromising or damaging information about them" and extortion is "the practice of obtaining something, especially money (but in this case sex ) through force or threats" so technically Yiyeon didn't blackmail him he extorted him, but I don't mean to offend you by saying this, I'm just sharing.
Yes I do agree Yiyeon is a rapist, the only reason Lee Nan even agreed to have sex with him was because it was more like a necessity so he could have a job, he didn't do it because he wanted to, more like because he needed to (meaning he was forced).
![](https://pic1.mangapicgallery.com/r/avatar/be/u1497420_50x50.jpg?2)
Lets be honest ok, would you rather get your ass professionally beat or get paid 14k to be raped. I KNOW WHAT IM PICKINGG, shit tough though if you get a tear it could cause an STI and its extremely painful. Im suprised Dan doesnt have AIDS from the amount of trauma his rectum has been through. Sexual abuse/violence rlly isnt a joke lol i think people underestimate how much it hurts to get raped anally (male and female). Your anus isnt meant to be penetrated and it doesnt have the elasticity like kitty does which is why having anal intercourse really fuckin hurts without prep. FYI article 297 of South Korea's penal code defines rape as intercourse by means of “violence or intimidation.” By definition Jaehyuk has used both in order to initiate intercourse with Dan, meaning he is a rapist and be criminally charged.
I saw a theory that Hikaru was not raped when he was 11 because he's actually a reincarnater. What bullshit logic lol. The manga shows that your mental maturity is influence by the age of the body youre reincarnated in. Aqua is a prime example, if hikaru wasnt raped then is Aqua a pedophile for liking Kana? Of course not homeboy's brain influences his maturity which is why we sometimes see him acting like an actual highschooler. Even if Hikaru is a reincarnator he was still raped, a 20+ yro woman agreeing to sleep with an 11 yro is statutory rape (if he was willing if not then jusg normal rape). No wonder that bitch's husband killed her and then himself, he probably found out she raped a little boy. He did society a fuckin favour, only a real motherfucker would do this shit
Lol, I was actually wondering how the movie was going to be able to portray Hikaru in a negative light since he was only 11-13 years old when everything happened so theyre just blaming a prepubescent boy for getting raped by people older than him. Realistically the reaction would be similar to yours rather than defending Ai.
Ai didnt rape Hikaru when he was 11 it was Airi Himekawa who molested him, he fathered Aqua and ruby with Ai when they were 15 and 16. He was the younger of the two.
Ah, my bad, I thought he was 13 when he fathered him. I do still think that adding the Airi and Hikaru story to the movie would ruin it because of how Aqua is trying to portray him as the abuser throughout. Sorry for not clarifying.
Most abusers gave been abused, its a learned action but still an action. Hikaru is still a bad guy for killing Ai and as far as i know being raped doesnt justify being a serial killer
Lol sorry for being confusing, but Im talking about the general public reception, not the actual real life story. If a movie portrayed a woman cheating on her husband with an 11 year old old, but said the 11 year old boy was the one in the wrong, AND he was also a mass murderer, people would probably not react very well to it. Aqua also doesn't have any actual evidence as far as I know, so it would also just seem like a personal attack instead of based on fact. I understand that Hikaru is an asshole and the antagonist, I just thought that the movie would be seen as defamation instead of being well acclaimed in a real life scenario.
I guess I wasnt being clear so sorry for that, Im not saying he's in the right for muder, I'm talking about how the movie would be received.