What’s with the Japanese and their obsession with dating high schoolers…
Literally turned 20 yesterday and I my response to the last slide would be to walk away and not look back tf
I'm referring to the og comment. the char is 18. titles with a purpose to signify maturity such as high schooler stop bearing meaning after 17.
the developmental state of the brain progresses little from the age of 17 till 18, and is completed by 22 max. people are not babies nor immature at 17-18, they're near completion. only inexperienced. therefore be it 17 or 18 dating an adult near 21-22 is A-okay! i rest my case.
below 17 is not okay, because brain development is lacking. why would an adult want to date a biologically incomplete human incapable of being fully aware of their decisions? of fathoming the world from all types of viewpoints and most importantly understanding the concept of self?
honestly i feel like this is more of an opinion, it can still come off morally weird no matter what you say how the brain works. a 22 y/o romantically and sexually getting in a relationship with a 17 year old is weird dudeee. i dont rlly get this argument either why can’t a 22 year old like mfs around their age and not high schoolers ? dunno im 17 rn and i think its insane
what? of course brain developmemt can justify it. the whole discourse about age gaps around the ages of 17-22 is based on brain development. that is the fundamental difference between an adult and a child and why it is considered illegal to be romantically interested in a child and an adolescent as an adult... it's not the age gap that's the issue, lol..
a legal adult is considered to be 18 but actual adulthood occurs at 22. 18 yos can drink legally and you act like adolescents never drink. we aren't talking about how things should be, but how they are. alas, drinking habits play no role in this and are utterly irrelevant. if you think it's gross without any solid ground to base it off and just pin it on opinions (it's not a matter of opinions in this case), sorry to hear, but that's not how this matter should be dealt with.
apparently there's a maturity difference between us as well, considering you assume i am actually fond of this age difference, even though i merely stated that it's justifiable. and.. i guess the sensible thing to do according to you is to limit myself to high schoolers since we're a year apart, lol.
no matter how old you are, in the end it's the one who was more interested in assessing truths and indulged in introspection, the one who was willing to escape the binds of what is considered to be normality, rather than to hide behind a faulty law with countless of variables of influence, who is most mature. what i mean to say by this extended, mildly passive aggressive ramble is that maturity is an expansive concept, which isn't limited to age (biological development) and experience, but heavily touches upon the term "effort" and many more too.
i expect nothing of you to tell me. you initiated this conversation with me, i am merely responding accordingly.
hi babe i’m not off work but it’s soooo slow so i’m back did u wait for meeee ;3; work was so fun thank u babycakes you didn’t ruin my mood. hope ur sleeping well and dreaming of me ^_^
the primary concerns with a 22-year-old dating a 17-year-old often center around maturity differences and legal considerations. At 17, individuals are generally still in their teenage years and may have different life experiences, emotional development, and perspectives compared to a 22-year-old, who is typically more established in adulthood. this disparity can lead to an imbalance.
additionally, a 17-year-old is typically still in high school and may be undergoing significant emotional and cognitive development. In contrast, a 22-year-old is likely to have completed higher education or started a career, leading to greater life experience and maturity. although that itself is hard to speak for every person out there, it isn’t necessarily wrong. but it is silly to say a 17 year old can uphold more if not the same maturity as someone who’s 22 imo….unless there is a reason behind the lack of development, it just sounds like an excuse seriouslyyyy.
By the time someone turns 22 they've developed the full capability to grow to be mature but that doesn't necessarily mean they are or that they make this choice. as i've mentioned before, there is no real major development during the transition from 17 to 18, which is considered to be the legal coming of age. but rather than remaining
in theory let's consider how many "mature and experienced in life" people, especially troubled old men have induldged in femicides because they couldn't reason with themselves or understand the capacity of their emotions, although their brain is developed. in this sense, yes, it's very possible a 17yo upholds the same maturity as a 22yo (just not biological). because maturity is, again, a wide spectrum. a 17 yo could have been working part time for the longest time and have been gaining experience in socialising, behaving themselves, understanding social cues and etiquette, acknowledging the importance of cooperation, learning to cooperate. they could have had a horrid familial environment and grown familiar with the implications of various physical and mental health conditions. learnt to deal with them, enhanced their observational skills and dealt with injustice. etc.
due to the uncertainty of whether someone is willing to embrace their maturity, we are obliged to consider other aspects, dependent on each person. we have to take a closer look and include the circumstances and an individual's behaviour in our perception. insisting on speaking titles is foolish when we've got the facts before our eyes, aka dismissing a person's struggle to build their character and love is foolish. we act like people in their late teens all are dependent infants while willingly staying under the notion that times are still the same and aren't vastly progressing, while young adults enter a completely different dimension. and that's simply not true.
It had a pretty okay concept, but honestly ruined by mid storytelling and choppy dialogue . They’ve clearly tried to do something different with more of an explanation on the actual reincarnation but it’s honestly not explained that well, and the references to it also being the plot of a Novel are simultaneously forced and unclear. Also makes me lol at how many tropes they’ve crammed in here despite trying to be different (maybe that’s mean lol)
Read if you’re bored ig - dropped at ch15
So she was kicked out of a rich family and her birth family are even richer ? Confused.. and the pink haired girl is the actual daughter to her fake family? Then why isn’t she going back to them ? Idk
She’s probably trying to leach off of them knowing that they have more money
Very true, thx