And some not so good stuff here...
First, the art. The art was good and the women were pretty.
Second, the antagonist.
She was really absent from the book yet when she finally acted, it was really meaningful.
It didn't resolve the whole vampire situation and she was an antagonist only for the main character but managed to end at the same time too blandly and with a spectacular effect.
And the story in that aspect was quite interesting, not fabulous but enough to have a not so bad time.
Now I gotta say I'm a bit confused by the vampires. Their categorization was a good idea but not really exploited.
They were introduced as some kind of disease and I liked the idea, but it went nowhere and was completely cancelled with the holy water shit, I now understand that it was only a way to justify the whole holy blood thing but I find the disease version more attractive .
The Keith family thing, on the other end, was brillant. The father is certainly the worst sick shit I've seen in a while, but the background story of the Clifford family is awesome in their universe, I didn't see that coming and was satisfied with the main lead situation in the story.
I also liked the fact that this romance was very chaste but constant .
Oh, and the little cousins were absolutely forsaken by the end ^^'
Anyone here volunteering for a little friendly stalking?
I'm out of completed mangas to read and my wtr list is full of unfinished/ i dont even know why i added this/ dropped /absolutely forsaken stuff.
I like BL, horror, action, supernatural, comedy
I'm not really into plain romance, omegaverses, bdsmverses, whateverTheFuckVerses
I'm not an English native so i get easily confused by bad translations
I'm bored
No problem, stalk me to your heart content! Just know beforehand that i sometimes read some very weird shit (even I wonder how i came to click on some books here #-.-)) and my opinions are... Mine. I don't really seek people's acknowledgement so i tend to say shit the way i feel them, whether people agree or not lol
Maybe you'd look up yourself the definition of "coercion", huh, rational person?
Because...
"coercion is rape EVERYWHERE bro ToT"
...no.
That's not what coercion is.
if someone uses coercive methods to get sex then yes that would be rape because the would mean the other person didnt actually want to do it.
(idk how well this applies in the story, i didnt read it, i just saw your comment)
Oh don't worry about it, I don't even remember this story but this is the answer to a comment that I liked because I agreed with the message but I didn't think a applied to the story when I replied. But weeks later the kid came back and ended up telling me "coercion is rape EVERYWHERE bro ToT", so no, coercion can lead to rape but that's not what it is.
Coercion can make you buy useless shit, sign unfair contracts, leave you homeless for no reason, enter a cult... coercion have a bigger range of effects than rape.
When I explained this, the so "rational" kid blocked me calling "me" a shit stain and my "narrative" dangerous so I'm just suggesting to her to check the definition of a word she uses without understanding it, that's all ^^
lol you're giving the genral definition of coercion, thats why context is very much inportant in arguments or debates. in this case we are talking about coercion in terms sexual harassment. rape itself has its own spectrum, in my country rape is not only unconsented sexual penetration but also forceful and/or unwanted touching or unwelcoming sexual behaviors/innuendos. any law where you can find, they always have coercion as a ground for rape. so the bottom line, coercion is still rape, just not aggravated one.
Well I also mentioned the cultural aspect this, since in [my] country coercion is coercion, rape is rape and sexual assault is also considered and handled differently and it's after I mentioned it that I got the "coercion is rape EVERYWHERE bro ToT", by someone who seems to think that coercion IS a sexual behavior, and when I tried to explain that it's not that I got blocked and insulted.
No hard feeling, just explaining to the kid that words have precise meaning, and that "her rational self" should know them if she doesn't want "shit stains" like myself to "blow up her notification with my dangerous narrative on such a sensible subject".
And as I also mentioned, I ain't gonna argue on this specific manga since I don't remember it well, it was weeks ago.
She is the very reason why adults hate interacting with kids, she doesn't even have to agree heh, that's how we hold interesting conversations... But welp. At least I said what I wanted without being forcibly shut up.
well, seeing the original comment, it doesn't have to be that deep and while i agree to both of you, you just unnecessary made it much of a big deal. thats how we acknowledge such type of sexual harassment here, think of it as a slang.
Hey, gonna say it again but I upvoted her original comment because I agreed with it and answered only because there are literally thousands of manga here that fitted her review perfectly, whereas here wasn't the case.
I alsooo mentioned the cultural, legal and literal aspects of the strong words she used on her comment and even the fact that I don't know shit about the country the author is from so I couldn't state a definite opinion on this matter.
I don't understand why she caught fire, started insulting me and blocking me, when you write a public post you accept that some people may disagree or/and simply might want to interact, that's just how it works.
So since she tried to force my mouth shut, I forced my answer anyways even though I'm not uneducated enough to insult her.
And I just noticed that I can't post any emojis from my keyboard in the comments, why is that???