No your right ╮(￣▽￣)╭. But if Anastacus didn't did or if someone practice black magic on him without any consent, the law won't apply right? And for the trahison part, you got a point but wht can prove that Anastacus had really empoisonned his brother ? Nothing for the moment. That"s why the next chapiter will be interesting
Do you remember the royal that was supposed to be Lucas' disciple but he harshly rejected the kid??? The one from the flashbacks? That exact guy possessed the body of Anastacius, so in short that is not really Anastacius. I forgot the name of the guy tsk
Oh my God, this gonna be interesting (☆▽☆)
I never thought this but it's logical, That explains why anastacus knows Lucas' landmark. I'm a little surprised anyway but I don't understand why this magician is mad at Claude. Lucas is supposed to be dead and he and Claude are apparently not connected, so why is he doing this?
We all know that Anastacius died, correct? Soo the only way he could’ve have revived himself is through black magic, no? Meaning he used forbidden magic and isnt allowed to sit on the throne, because it is not allowed. Unless they just over rule that law or in some way fake it saying he didn’t die, but he still committed treason am i wrong. Although I might be missing a few pieces of info I just needed to know if I was wrong. (〜￣△￣)〜