the user 'bangbangbang' seems to have blocked me. lol
so here is my latest reply to their last statement:
to bangbangbang:
the problems with your arguments is that you unfortunately muddle the plot so much, you seem to confuse even yourself.
I am glad that you finally understand that Suu had approached the carriage without knowing that someone would be in there to kill him. I really questioned your capacity for problem solving with that one.
I will help you more: SUU DID NOT KNOW THAT THE CONSORT WOULD BETRAY HIM.
Of course we saw that Suu betrayed the consort by not allowing the prince to drink the poisoned cup. However, he DID NOT know that the consort would betray him. In that moment, he believed that he could go back on his word, save the prince, and run like hell to the carriage before the consort could find away to counter him and disrupt his escape route.
As it turns out, she already had. Way before Suu had the chance to betray her, she had already made that move.
Again, Suu had no way of knowing that there would be someone in the carriage waiting for him. neither did the reader. again, there was no foreshadowing.
I feel like I have to repeat myself in a million different ways.
the fact that you did not even understand the concept of the wagon again, gives you zero legitimacy. you did not know someone would be in that wagon. Suu did not know. the reader did not know.
also, it was not cool for user 'bangbangbang' to use retardation as an insult.
i digress.
I am sorry but the way the consort was portrayed in the story was very obvious and it's plain af that she is going to betray the MC.
I feel like the story is dragged out but I am not ready to drop yet.
you must have read this entire argument, or at least some of it, but trust me, you are adding nothing new to a conversation that has already been expanded upon, and I've practically written an essay on this entire topic by now. If you would like to read my response to the very statement you have just made, please refer to my earlier comments.
If you want to start an argument, however, I can gladly go some rounds with you.
You said 'it's plain and obvious that she is going to betray the MC'
No one knew that the consort would place someone to kill Suu within the wagon, you did not, the reader did not, Suu did not, etc.
if you still have something to say, read the entire conversation before attempting to make a complete and solid argument. be prepared with proof. be prepared to back your statements. be prepared with evidence, and then I will happily oblige in arguing with you, as you seem to desire.
You seem to be defensive about your opinions. Maybe you can learn to respect the other people's opinions. I don't know why you keep insisting no one could foresee her plans. It's not like her plan is extraordinary and masterpiece. Sure, some readers can perfectly predict her move.
sure, some people were able to predict it. you're never fully supposed to trust the consort, as Suu does not. I've already stated that. my overarching statement is that Suu, however, believed that she would help. it was a lapse in judgement.
I'm just curious as to what you are attempting to gain in engaging me. The title of this thread is something along the lines of 'the uke is stupid,' etc.
my arguments so far have been in defense of Suu, and I have made plenty of other arguments other than the sole one you are pointing out.
anyways, by going against me, you are going against a barrier that protects the characters from the onslaught of bizarre and wrong accusations the previous commenter made.
my question is why? there must be a solid point you want to make. please make it.
I am not interested in the characters. But the way you keep writing that no one could see her betraying the main character has become annoying. Not everyone is going to fall for her scheme. Besides I don't think the original comment stated that the uke is stupid. I am pretty sure I didn't reply to that.
right. so you've failed in producing anything other than repetition of previous arguments.
please go ahead and read my previous comments.
attempting to start an argument with a leading 'you're being annoying' just doesn't cut it for me
I am glad we can agree on sth.
No pb. ^^
Definitely, I agree with you.
I don't like the uke..here....I'm thinking to drop this..