I honestly am not sure and I feel like we need a epilogue explaining. But what I got out of it was that Clark was the killer the whole time. And that's why he had the finger and that's why he said he was glad that dude wasn't in love with him I could be totally wrong tho
Actually, screw what I just said. I have no idea what's going on. Lol. I think a chapter or two didn't load for me so I'm lost
Ugh... thats exactly why i need explaining? I got the idea that he was the killer the whole time, but it doesnt make sense.
Bruh I knooowww. Ugh. Lol.
I got all the chapters loaded but still had no idea lmao
Yeah. same. I went back and still confused af (づ￣ ³￣)づ
I was thinking that Clark searched and found the doctor's finger before setting the house on fire.
Holyshit you still had the strength to go back?? Σ(っ°Д °;)っ you get my respect
Well... that much is obvious.
Bro idek anymore. It was a super good story. And I wonder if the author purposely wrote it that way, to confuse us
Maybe (￣ε(#￣)Σ either my dumbass cant think properly or my anxiety is connecting too much dots.
Why did clark said "Im glad you are not in love with me" in the end??
Did clark asked him because he was paranoid? Or in a way, traumatized? Thinking that if he is in love with him then he might become obsessed so he will have to kill him too like what he did to Alex?