I agree lol. People should learn to differentiate between 2D and 3D.
Saying that a loli and an actual children are the same is like saying that to play online FPS games and actually shooting people are the same, it's nonsense.
Plus the kind of over-the-top-ineffective-pedos you see in manga (like Tsunosaki here or Nicchi-senpai in Otaku no Musume-san) are a lot of fun to read.
No he's not... don't try to fool yourself into believing that, if you're going to read something like this look it in it's ugly face. He is a pedophile, he was telling that little boy to go into the bushes with him and get naked. I don't even think the boy was of any relation to him either, i think the boy he was patching up was just some random kid he'd stopped so he could patch up his knee and feel him up... he is literally a predator... It's portrayed as a joke so that people like you won't get scared off and stop reading, but it IS the truth.
He wasn't appreciating 2d children, he was going full on predator attacking real children (from his perspective, not ours. Obviously this is fiction). He stopped someone's kid so he could patch up the boy's knee and then feel him up and asked the boy to follow him into the bushes to get naked with him... He is a real pedophile, it isn't just appreciation of children, he likes them romantically.
I was replying to the author of the comment. The character in the manga wasn't, I agree and the thing is: the dude is 2D too, this is a work of fiction, it's like killing Kenny again and no one was hurt. This is the distinction between 2D and 3D: as long as it's 2D who cares : V
Okay, but you decided to give your opinion on what was happening within said fiction in a comments section where people who want to discuss the manga are going to reply. Putting aside the fact that this is fiction, since that is irrelevant as we're within the comments section of this manga to discuss our thoughts on said manga and it's contents, if we're looking at the evidence provided within this manga pointing towards this being pedophilia, that being the scene where he asks a child to go into the bushes with him and get naked and the scene where he discusses with the MC how he can't feel romantic feelings towards other people besides children, it is a pretty solid case. If you're going to post thoughts controversial thoughts you really need to be prepared for people to argue otherwise.
Yeah, I get that nor I ever denied that the chara in the manga is portrayed to actually being a pedo. That wasn't the point of my comment doe? My point is reality =/= fiction and agreeing with the OP in saying that this is just a manga and trying to align real world morals to it is pointless, simple as that. Your reply is a different argument altogether : V
I don't want to argue with you, but in my defense i'll point out that the OP didn't JUST say "this is a manga", they also said "he is just a lolicon". Which is what i was arguing with against both of you since you didn't JUST agree that this is fiction, you also agreed that you think of the MC as a loli, here i'll quote: "Saying that a loli and an actual children are the same is like saying that to play online FPS games and actually shooting people are the same, it's nonsense". I admitted that this is fiction in my very first response, so we can move on from that. Now lets address the OTHER point you two made.
If you want to be right, then be right I don't care lol. I too have better things to do than to argue with strangers on the internet over things that don't even concern me : V
"i have better things to do than argue with someone on the internet about things that don't concern me"----Not a very convincing argument considering you went out of your way to post your thoughts on here... It's easy to act like you don't care AFTER someone points out obvious faults in your logic, but that's what i'm here for.
It does not concern me because you completely missed my point and went down your road trying to imply that I said things I didn't say so that they would suit your argument. And then you point at apparent faults in my comments that would be there only if my argument was the one you intended in the first place, while my point, or better, expressed opinion
You're arguing with yourself here.
This will be my last reply since it seems that you're either not reading nor willing to see what my point was in the first place so there's nothing I can do about it and a fool will always be right. Have a nice day. : V
*while my point, or better, expressed opinion, was rather simple and not related at all to the whole comment left by the OP but only to a part of it.
(Yup I forgot to end the sentence the first time. This is what happens when one does not re-read before submitting lol).
Whether you meant to agree on the two points provided by the OP or not, you did. Unless you'd like to tell me another way "Saying that a loli and an actual children are the same is like saying that to play online FPS games and actually shooting people are the same, it's nonsense" could be interpreted? Like i said, i'm not wanting to argue with you. The fact that you're trying to back out now is enough for me. If you want to end the argument feel free and stop responding : D
you're fucking vile i hope you die.
...
Oh you guys, he is just a lolicon, and this is just a manga, you guys have no sense of humor.
I'm a lolicon too, but I just like 2D kids. 3D kids are disgusting man, every time I see one it makes me want to punch them in their stupid little smelly faces.