I agree. Even on the latest episode it's dubious consent since the uke thinks he's dreaming and he's also inebriated.
I like the story but some of the stuff happening here is questionably immoral.
Why? Why can't he like someone and still ahave sex with someone else? They're not dating, he doesn't owe him anything. I don't like the seme anymore because he had sex with a drunk person, NOT because he had sex with someone else. It isn't "questionably moral" to do so.
Huh? Did you understand my reply at all?
I was referring to fucking a drunk person as questionably IMMORAL (not moral, check your comment properly before posting)
No one's fighting you over the seme fucking another guy that's not the uke.
Please read carefully before replying. It seems you reply without understanding what I'm saying.
Agreed!
I was never talking to you lmao
I was talkig to the person above you, if I did want to talk about you I wouldve replied to YOUR comment. Btw yes I have seen people say it's not respectable for a person to have sex with another person while having a crush on another person.
"It isn't "questionably moral" to do so."
So why are you trying to wrongly quote what I said about questionable immorality? If you weren't talking to me, why even add this bit when you know full well I mentioned that in my reply? Coincidence? Lmao
I guess I was talking to both of you. My mistake. However, I thought you agreed that a person shouldnt have sex with someone if they're in love with someone else because you said "I agree". So I thought that you also felt the same way. I was mostly replying to the other person, but yes I guess I wrongly misqouted you. But you can't say it was clear that you didn't agree that it was bad. BTW it isn't "questionably immoral", he had sex with a drunk person.
If you don't agree that having sex with someone else while being in love with someone else is bad, what are you agreeing for? The stuff you said after didn't really 'match up' (?) with what the other person said. So I thought you agreed that it was bad. My mistake for talking to you, I shouldv'e talked about what OP said.
Guys! There will be disagreements even within our agreements. That's completely okay. Let's all just agree that we're all disgruntled with the seme nonetheless.
Agree.
Since your comprehension is segmented, I'll break it down so you don't get confused.
When I said I agree with the OP, I agreed with his closing statement "But if that is what it is, then we must also agree that seme's interest in uke is largely sexual and not really developed on the emotional side."
that's why you don't see my reply alluding to anything about the seme fucking another person. The seme's action only shows he's mainly interested sexually to the uke, and went as far as sleeping with a drunk whose consent is not clear whether it is given or not.
But you can't say it was clear that you didn't agree that it was bad
> Don't twist my words and make it fit your narrative. I CAN'T say that it was CLEAR that I DIDN'T agree it was bad? If you're not very proficient in English I would understand why your reading comprehension is poor, that's why I told you to check your comment properly before posting. At this point, you're grasping at straws to justify your passive aggressive jab at my valid comments.
BTW it isn't "questionably immoral", he had sex with a drunk person.
> By QUESTIONABLY IMMORAL, I meant it as a 'negative meaning' because, by common sense, sleeping with a drunk is moral and may be questionable is DEFAULT WRONG, because sleeping with a drunk is immoral and can never be a moral act. And by common sense, saying 'QUESTIONABLY IMMORAL' is a better description than 'questionably moral'
I didn't know I'd have to give an English lesson on a very simple subject had you done your due diligence in comprehending instead of reacting.
I'm sorry for mistaking what you said. However, I still think that I had reasons to think that you thought it was okay.
1. Yes, now I know what you meant by that. However, when you said I agree full stop, it made me think you agreed with the whole paragraph. You didn't. Yes I know you didn't say anything afterwards about it. However, I thought that you were just adding on to what she said as she didn't really talk about the drunk sex thing. Therefore, I thought you did agree that having sex with another person while liking someone else is bad while just ADDING that having drunk sex with another person is bad.
2. Yes, I still think what you said was unclear. Reason is stated above. I'm not going to change my mind on that. I'm sorry for mistaking you. However, I still think that at the time, that I had reason to think that. Maybe it was grasping at straws, however I tend to look at the details and maybe overthink things.
3. Questionably immoral. When you say Q.I (Questionably immoral), you're saying that it's: almost, kinda, in a way, not completely immoral. It's questionable. 85 percent maybe. Still a little confused. Maybe if you were sarcastic then it wouldn't mean that. That's what questionably immoral means to me. Again, it's questionable.
4. No, I still think I had my reasons for believing that you thought that. I'm sorry that I mistoke what you said. I think I comprehended what you said wrong, but everything pointed to what I thought. I think you could've worded it better, or at least you can't fault me in believng what I believed in. Reasons stated above.
*I did comprehend wrong.
TBH, I probably was mad when I made that first comment because I kept seeing so many of them. That's why I grouped you together even though you didn't EXPLICITLY say that. But I still think that I had other reasons. (1)
(3) Clarifiction (I felt that I wasn't clear on that). "Questionably moral" and "Questionably immoral" have the same nuance to me. The only difference is that Q.M feels less sure. Yes, I'm aware that that may be stupid to think but I've literally never seen both used differently. Maybe it's because there's never been a situation where somebody had to point out that something supposedly bad may be morally fine. Therefore, me saying this may be because I've my no exposure to a different nuance.
Q.M== not really sure it's moral
Q.I== you're saying that it's "kinda immoral" but maybe you're not sure how you feel about about it.
Something morally good
.
.
.
.
Q.M
.
.
Q.I
.
.
(not the most accurate)
Something morally bad
All of my posts are written using a touch screen so sorry for the mistakes you might come across!
Guys, I am confusion （/TДT)/
I just can't. I can't tolerate that seme likes uke and still sleeps around. Seme wants to have the uke but cannot keep his junk inside his own pants for a while? What kind of a person is he? Because this is recipe for a disaster. On one hand I understand that the seme keeps his needs and his subject of interest separate, because what if uke ultimately does not reciprocate likewise. But if that is what it is, then we must also agree that seme's interest in uke is largely sexual and not really developed on the emotional side.