
the difference is those are humanoid animals and these are fucking children. Furries are fans of animalike characters they ain't fucking animals. And it's not on the same boat if there are children. Like how else do you explain it. "I enjoy reading about children having sex" how does that sound compared to "i like the way characters with animal like features look". Im not a furry but there is a huge difference

fair enough. I know a lot of people like reading incest hentai/yaoi too. and im pretty sure not .0001% of those want to fuck their own moms/dads/brothers/sisters... at least I hope not.
Btw, just fyi, I enjoyed this story because I think it's cute and unique, I tolerate the shota and that taking pictures moments, but I will not deny I thoroughly enjoy the story. I think the shota did make the story into the unique atmosphere that it is.

Bro i get that but it doesn't change the fact that it's fetishizing children. Like that just revolting to me. In this case the story doesn't matter. Trust me people can do stories about the sexual abuse of children right and it can be reallg engaging. But this is just blatant chuld pornoghraphy and that just wrong to me.
*see a shota on the cover
* see yaoi, smut, shotacon tag
*read it anyways
* omg, how could the mangaka!!!!