The only thing Inhun is worse than Seungho is him being fake. He always acts virtuous and ...

The only thing Inhun is worse than Seungho is him being fake. He always acts virtuous and moral, pretending to care for his students, while in fact he doesn’t give a shit about them. He gave Nakyum false hope and use Nakyum’s affection to achieve his self-interest. Whereas Seungho doesn’t give a shit what others would think about him and he does what he wants, and he’s starting to feel something for my baby.

Thhe thing i have problem with is that some of you are blaming Inhun for his act of “victim blaming, victing shaming, victim exploitation and mental abuse”. You also blamed him for physically abusing Nakyum (chapter 34) and for manipulating Nakyum to do his biddings.

Yet when Seungho did the same thing- the manipulation (he took advantage of Nakyum’s affection for his teacher), the physical abuse (he slapped Nakyum’s face, broke Nakyum’s nose), and even worse the obvious rape-till-exhaustion, you overlook his wrongdoings on grounds of historical setting. As far as i’m concerned, a mere half a century ago victim blaming was the norm in a lot of countries. If you got raped, you’d be a slut and people wouldn’t feel bad calling you so. Teachers using corporal punishment was encouraged, especially with the use of rod and verbal abuse. Some even made their students kneel on spiky objects till their knees bleed and bruise, or slapped them in the face, and other more humiliating kinds. The saying “spare the rod, spoil the child” was very prevalent.

In sum, Seungho and Inhun has a lot in common. What Inhun did was historically acceptable and nowhere as horrible as that of Seungho. So i think it’s kinda hypocritical to despise Inhun for those things and not Seungho, because at this point what Seungho did is still worse and he hasn’t done anywhere near enough to make up for it.