uhh. stop sexually molesting a sleeping sick person (╬ ̄皿 ̄)

masticatious January 14, 2020 12:59 am

I see they aren't really drawing any lines of distinguishment when it comes to biological reaction//verbal consent either, just conflating the two. "whats the problem your dick/pussy is wet so it's fine right?" ╮( ̄▽ ̄)╭

Responses
    Arethwyn January 14, 2020 9:09 am

    Uhh, it's from a position of not understanding. Like kids eating tons of candy because "candy is tasty" without understanding tooth decay. He doesn't understand why she doesn't want him to make her "feel good". He was programmed with knowledge of "how to make master feel good", not "is it ok if I get intimate with master?". Now he's like a boy entering puberty and wondering why he's getting erections. He mentions that she got angry at him before when he touched her but -he doesn't understand why-.
    He has a plethora of skills but no common sense.

    masticatious January 15, 2020 8:20 am
    Uhh, it's from a position of not understanding. Like kids eating tons of candy because "candy is tasty" without understanding tooth decay. He doesn't understand why she doesn't want him to make her "feel good".... Arethwyn

    he admitted himself what he was doing wasn't for her benefit. the lot disliking my comment are really creepy to not see anything wrong here.

    Arethwyn January 18, 2020 5:45 am
    he admitted himself what he was doing wasn't for her benefit. the lot disliking my comment are really creepy to not see anything wrong here. masticatious

    You're still projecting human sense onto the situation. He's not human, he's a robot. A dildo with a pseudo personality. Calling people creepy for disliking your comment saying it's because they don't see anything wrong with the situation is a bit presumptuous. You don't know what their reasoning was for the dislike so stop projecting your insecurities.
    Obviously, if a person taking care of another person knowingly took advantage of them then there's something seriously wrong going on. But it's a robot, and he's not aware that touching without consent is "wrong" from a "morals" standpoint. Morals are acquired through experience and learning, (most) humans are taught such basic things from a young age. It's why you can find drastically different moral codes in cultures across the world.
    He keeps doing things to pleasure her despite protest because he recognizes [Her in pleasure = Her Happy] even if that isn't completely true. At the end of the day it's all about doing it FOR HER to be happy.

    Now, the line you're referencing:
    "That wasn't for her sake at all..." that thought was in the context of "Why did I touch her while she was sleeping...? That wasn't for her sake at all... Is something wrong with me?"
    He started to clean her sweat, nothing wrong. He made observations about human skin vs his own, but on seeing her body he started getting urges, went into a trance, and started imagining what it would be like to use the intercourse function he's been equipped with for her. He then came to a realization upon thinking... and this is important... "I want".
    He only used the phrase "I want" a couple of times in the chapters before, but they were things for her. "I want to do this for you", "I want to help you".
    This time was: "I want her to call my name."
    "I want her to do something FOR ME."
    That stopped him in his tracks, he realized that what he was doing (touching) wasn't for the purpose of helping her or making her happy but for his own selfish want.
    He's heating up "for no reason" and his "intercourse function" is trying to activate itself without his input. This has lead him to think something in him is "broken". This leads to his request at the end of chapter 5.
    This one's a bit more smutty compared to similar, more pure-love-type robot+human manga, and it is a little bit forced to say the least.
    It's all rather cliche and they already foreshadowed him overheating and losing his memory. There are a few possible endings after that I can think of but we'll see.

    But, yeah. I didn't dislike your comment because I'm "creepy" like you said.
    I'm just not a shallow reader like yourself.
    Cheers.