It seems more fucked up because the 13 year old seems even younger than 13 because of the ...

Shirayukihime1901 November 19, 2019 10:32 pm

It seems more fucked up because the 13 year old seems even younger than 13 because of the way he was drawn. I‘m not reacting like other people here because I know a lot of people (not my friends) that were like 14 and are or were going out with a 17-18 year old.
Ok in this manga this was a 17 year old molesting a 13 year old so its obviously something nobody should support but is it really pedophile? I‘m just wonderin because if it is pedophile then the people I know are pedophile too right? I‘m creeped out.

Before anyone is going to misunderstand me: I‘m not a supporter of being a pedophile or anything that has to with molesting. I’m just confused right now

Responses
    Grital November 19, 2019 10:40 pm

    I’m just scrolling through the comments right now so haven’t read this yet (tbh don’t think I will) but I think it reaches pedo levels when they start being really sexual, rather than just the simple ‘I want to be with this person’ it once your actually doing things and thinking really graphic things that someone of that age won’t even understand yet. Hope this helps you decide if it’s worth the pedophile tag or not

    lostikins November 19, 2019 10:53 pm

    In most states in the US there is a law called the "Romeo and Juliet" law. If one is younger than the other but both are below the age of 18 it is not considered pedophilia. Not saying the situation isn't fucky but in the eyes of the law it isn't considered pedophilia.

    Pandacorns312524 November 20, 2019 1:38 am
    In most states in the US there is a law called the "Romeo and Juliet" law. If one is younger than the other but both are below the age of 18 it is not considered pedophilia. Not saying the situation isn't fucky... lostikins

    The Romeo and Juliet law only extend to 3 years and they had to be together before one of them turns 18 so for example if a 15 year was dating a 18 year old they had to be together for a certain amount of time. But I get where you are getting at.

    lostikins November 20, 2019 1:57 am
    The Romeo and Juliet law only extend to 3 years and they had to be together before one of them turns 18 so for example if a 15 year was dating a 18 year old they had to be together for a certain amount of time.... Pandacorns312524

    It also depends on the court ((if this were a court scenario)). I had a relative who's child had to go through this cause they were 13 and were coerced into doing things with a 17 year old. Sometimes they'll rule it even if they weren't technically together if the younger one confessed to consenting. Which in this scenario the younger guy seems to have done just that gradually. Still fucky tho. Like, this took a turn I didn't think it would and idek how I feel about it.

    Pandacorns312524 November 20, 2019 3:03 am
    It also depends on the court ((if this were a court scenario)). I had a relative who's child had to go through this cause they were 13 and were coerced into doing things with a 17 year old. Sometimes they'll ru... lostikins

    Yea, I get it. We had the same problem kind of. The girl said this guy raped her and with his age it was a whole mess and I think the case was dropped, because it was mess on top of mess.