SAME! I WONDERED TOO. ESPECIALLY WHE. HE SAID TO TVE INSPECTOR "I'M GLAD YOU'RE NOT IN LOVE WITH ME" AND SHOWED THAT BOOK AND FINGER AT THE END
Yeah that was really shocking and what made me think that maybe he was the killer all along. I was kinda surprised more people weren’t commenting on it.
Riggght. I mean how can he so clearly analyze Alex, if he does not have first-hand experience. Alex must be a child compared to a pro like him.
This also brings back the cat in the very beginning. Everyone said in the comments that Clark didn’t poison it, but looking back on it now I think he did. It’s the same method that Alex was murdered too. It is said that serial killers usually begin by killing animals too.
Wait. What? Alex was poisoned? Which part? I thought he was stabbed. Did I miss that? But considering that - then all the more reason to doubt Clark is the fucked up. He is so mysterious, not a shard of his background was even showed, unlike Alex who was dissected all throughout the story.
Was he stabbed? Maybe, but I thought he poisoned him. Yeah it never really talked about his background just that he liked to collect dirt on people. But the beginning is odd it never showed if he poisoned the cat or just watched it happen. But maybe that was the point of it putting all of Alex’s background on display so that we don’t really suspect Clark.
Yes that's what I saw. Hahaha. I'm going to look at it again. Thank you
I knew it! I knew in the end Clark would be the one. I know some people think that it might have been too easy, but when they mentioned a copycat killer. It makes me wonder if Clark had been a killer this whole time and why it was so easy was because it was just second nature to him.