Dude, that's not rape, the author didn't intend to be rape so why the fuck are you obsessed
Now you know lawyers use mangago. Also, law is man made. Your opinion seems wrong, change it.
You said you didn't know lawyers used mangago. So I said, now you know.
Since you brought up lawyers, I said the law is also man made. Everything lawyers say isn't the ultimate truth.
And your opinion about the rape scene is wrong, change it if possible. Yeah, by legal standards, a lot of shit here would be illegal. But the author has drawn with her opinions in mind and this is her story, so according to that, it's not rape.
XD
I know it was sarcasm you idiot.
And your opinion is wrong. It wasn't rape.
Reading and debating in the comments I've noticed how people can twist this story's content to make it fit a certain narrative.
For example. Hyesung dropping the baby can be taken two ways: he's a bad person or he's an unsuitable parent. There is no right or wrong answer.
Another example is the sex in chapter 39. In my opinion this is rape since Hyesung punches Dojin to get off in the start and has a scared expression when Dojin holds his throat (NOW HOLD ON BEFORE Y'ALL ATTACK ME) but other people take this as sexual tension and Hyesung means yes when he says no.
My point is this story is everyone has their own opinions, its extremely hard to comprehend opposing arguements depending on you choose to see the story. so there is not really any point in arguing against an opinion.