lmao just call them two dads
Do you wanna imply that being women or taking a feminine role means/is a sign that you have to submit to the other guy? That's sexism! Also without a doubt insulting! #-.-)
Mine was meant as a lighthearted comment that you see as stereotyping. Besides they have male and female sexes in omegaverse as per appereances only so one who appears to be a female can be a father too so what's wrong with a guy being a mother?! If I am not wrong then isn't it you who is stereotyping?!
if an actual man were capable of having a child and they so forth decided to have their children refer to him as a mother, then that's a designation that their allowed of their own free will. However you trying to flip this is as a comment of sexism, is not valid, when gay or homo leaning men are degraded by society through feminine attributes. In the context of a gay relationship despite your attempt at lightheartedness, referring to one member of the couple as the mother is the equivalent of asking who's the "woman" in the relationship that is so crassly asked of gay couples. The point is, there is no woman in the relationship whatsoever, and yes being a mother is a gendered social construct I'll admit to that, but because we have made it so. Male seahorses carry their children even within in a "heterosexual"(also construct) relationship the same can be said for certain species of male penguins who almost solely nurture for some time their offspring immediately after the egg has hatched. Yet they are not considered a mother even then but as the father figure. Being designated a mother is more attributed to the individual dealing with gestation and then after nursing. If you were to imply this as your definition of motherhood to the dark haired alpha then that's fair enough a reason, but that is because society has decided to use the term mother for this and apply this to femme sexed individuals. Father could have easily been defined this way too. We could flip this, and even include other heteronormative labels such as husband and wife. But why, then must we adhere to a heteronormative dichotomy of this(father) or that(mother), when in actually these alphas identify as equal cis males of the same nature (they're husbands to one another, so they stand to be fathers similarly to their children). In this way it's not a matter of the difference signified by mother and father but the similarity of the individuals of both equally being able to bear children and be a parental figure at least in this fictional universe. Hence father/father or if you wanted mother/mother rather than mother/father. Don't accuse someone of sexism either when you're applying biased ideas of sex even in your own argument.
Spoiler for last chapter
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Black haired gives birth and in turn, the white haired tells him that it'll be his turn next time
No, their argument was entirely valid and your statement wasn't even within context. Again, no one said "submission", YOU brought that up. What was said was "usually it's the one that gives birth that is called mom", which literally just makes sense. Not sure where submission comes into there... It doesn't. Not sure what part of their argument "wasn't valid" to you, i guess you just don't have a counter because you obviously look sexist by saying it's "submissive" for one of them to be called "mom"...
I wish authors would sometimes make both partners pregnant, especially if they are both alpha and fighting for the top. You get seke manga + some comedy with it lol ( ̄∇ ̄")