Maybe the writer is an atheist.
Well, still atheist wouldn't say that christian use cross as sex object. An atheist may use, and if it is showing bimbisar as an atheist who is using an object of worship as such in his personal home then I have no problem. Still wouldn't read. :)
Fuck author for not respecting religion
He's indicating the tribe not Indians bruh. .there's a tribe with same name chill
But shiv ling is worshipped by Indians hindu... And bimbisar was a real king in ancient India so ig the author really meant asian Indians....
But shiv ling is worshipped by Indians hindu... And bimbisar was a real king in ancient India so ig the author really meant asian Indians....p
And will not... As an Indian and as a hindu it is very disrespectful if the shiva lingam is actually put in "places" ... I'm sorry but didn't expect this from asian writers... They should know better as our gods and deities are common or similar. One can imagine fictitious deva, or kami and play along with it but to use an actual symbol of worship is a little disheartening. What we here call 'saraswati' is "Biancaitian" in Chinese and "Bensaiten" in Japanese, Kisshooten (吉祥天) is called lakshmi here... Google Kangiten and then google Ganesha both are same god called by different name in Japan and india.
For people of non eastern religion or culture, it is like using cross or rolled paper of quran or bible as sexual toys. Anyway, if it is artistic liberty, then so be it. I love you.