You’re both men. Why is whether or not you’re blood related the thing that was stoppi...

KING_SVKII March 30, 2025 3:42 pm

You’re both men.
Why is whether or not you’re blood related the thing that was stopping you? There was no risk of inbreeding, so why did the fact that he’s adopted make any difference? I’m obviously not saying male on male incest is okay just because there’s no pregnancy risk, I’m just scratching my head wondering wtf his justification is for ‘even though I was just thinking that since he’s my brother I need to take this to the grave, the moment I find we’re not actually blood relatives, it’s all fine even if I touch him’ even though you’re still legally brothers, and he has been in your family longer than you..

Responses
    KING_SVKII March 30, 2025 3:46 pm

    “Doesnt that make us strangers since we’re not blood related” No… It doesn’t. Not only does it not, you wouldn’t even be on top of him trying to rape him if you were strangers.

    Hannigram April 10, 2025 3:11 pm

    I'm sorry what. Male or female, this is just a weird as fuck thing to say. Even without the risk of inbreeding, you'd sure as fuck hope it would stop him where it was his older brother or older sister. Your line of thinking doesn't make sense, it's like you're saying gay invest is less bad than straight incest, and that's just not true. I don't know if you meant it to come off like this or not, but you really need to think about what you say before you post