Since there's several people complaining about it being shown as revenge porn, if it's accepted by the court as evidence then it was valid to present it, because it directly supports the fact that she's letting it up her ass for favors (bribery). The magic used could also be considered as surveillance footage, but because it records everything including private chambers, then it is a slippery slope. Although, in modern standards, it should've only been viewed by the judge and legal counsel for privacy. But this is a magical fictional world that very well may have different laws and standards. Something legal isn't necessarily ethical, but keep in mind this is a fictional world with their own processes. You can say it's bad while also understanding why it was shown. Without showing evidence, they could be accused of exaggerating the extent of her bribery.
Since there's several people complaining about it being shown as revenge porn, if it's accepted by the court as evidence then it was valid to present it, because it directly supports the fact that she's letting it up her ass for favors (bribery). The magic used could also be considered as surveillance footage, but because it records everything including private chambers, then it is a slippery slope. Although, in modern standards, it should've only been viewed by the judge and legal counsel for privacy. But this is a magical fictional world that very well may have different laws and standards.
Something legal isn't necessarily ethical, but keep in mind this is a fictional world with their own processes. You can say it's bad while also understanding why it was shown. Without showing evidence, they could be accused of exaggerating the extent of her bribery.