... What kind of BS is that about dick evolution ? I think it was so dumb it melted my bra...

JulyInAugust February 24, 2025 9:20 pm

... What kind of BS is that about dick evolution ? I think it was so dumb it melted my brain.

Responses
    Niki March 4, 2025 4:08 am

    HahahahHAHAH THAT WAS SO DUMB

    buttcruncher March 4, 2025 4:10 pm

    it’s true tho lol

    JulyInAugust March 4, 2025 6:15 pm
    it’s true tho lol buttcruncher

    No it's not ! Lmao sex ed failed you.

    Just for everyone in the back, some believe our ancestors may have had stud that held that purpose but since humans don't have them this discussion is dumb because even if it was true we actually evolved to lose that function. So case closed, no, human penises don't rack semen out.

    buttcruncher March 4, 2025 9:14 pm
    No it's not ! Lmao sex ed failed you. Just for everyone in the back, some believe our ancestors may have had stud that held that purpose but since humans don't have them this discussion is dumb because even if ... JulyInAugust

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/bering-in-mind/the-misunderstood-penis/

    Puppyboy Agend-er April 1, 2025 2:21 am
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/bering-in-mind/the-misunderstood-penis/ buttcruncher

    This was actually kind of a funny read lol

    Don't know if it's fully backed or not, but it is believable that maybe over the ages human reproductive organs have changed. If other parts of our body like our facial structures, teeth and even organs can evolve slowly over time why would genitals be exempt from this?

    Tho I could never say in confidence as to why they would change or not lol I'm not a scientist.

    JulyInAugust April 1, 2025 8:44 am
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/bering-in-mind/the-misunderstood-penis/ buttcruncher

    That article explain nothing at all, it's just someone who believe in a theory responding to other people who believe in it. Worse, the first thing you read is a disclaimer at the beginning about the piece being the view of the author and not the view of the site.

    What did you want me to read in this ? I don't understand.