its fictional chill
just because its fiction im not allowed to have an opinion ? i like the story i said its good and bad qualities its called constructive criticism you use this feedback to make a better story experience
Not his company, but a subsidiary. It's very different. And subsidiaries differ too. For example, the parent company, could have stocks in XYZ's company, but not necessarily control. Management, sales, and decision-making of subsidiaries are typically done without the parent company.
Basically the ML has sway, but it's not even indirectly his fault bc he's not involved with management or the decision makings of a subsidiary.
right its not his fault, but they are going to make it seem like its his fault because its a subsidiary under his company / corporation.
thank you for the information but i already knew this i was just condensing it to get my point across
of course his company is the reason why mcs family business went bankrupt and as a result indirectly the reason for his very unfortunate life, what are the chances of that ? not very high i tell you
the story was too good that they had to add a stupidly unrealistic drama.
usually i wouldnt care enough to comment on a trope like this but im mad because the story was actually good and didnt need it. the loan sharks, debt collectors, and his father already managed to fill the role for drama perfectly - most of the time even this is not enough drama for a story but for this one it fit well and was really enough