being an open pedophile like this isn't something u should be proud about you fucked up piece of shit
Being a dumb bitch sure is a choice for you
sorry can't take words from a halfwit
Oh no they WALKED INTO A “SHOTA FACTORY”!!!1!1!1!1 I PROVED MY POINT YIPPEE IM SO SMAAAARTT
girl the fact that you called this a fucking shota factory says enough
Grow the fuck up and realise what’s wrong w this
Show your mama the damn phone
I think the only point I proved is that y'all can't read to save your lives
or you should not have been given the ability to read, better.
right??? if they hated this, then why are they here on every update? smh there's a river in egypt...
Dang is it the point that YOU proved or us? Y’all are so delusional that it’s sad actually is that how you cope?
Oh thanks I know the only thing you guys can say against us which is also an ASSUMPTION is this because clearly you guys have NOTHING but still won’t accept you’re in the wrong
I could not care less if you assume we read this tho I’m pretty sure we don’t
We’re still better than y’all because at least we admit this shit is ass
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1DOhIOb-tI5NTJCtoUnpsQ8ntZvgqR5FW/htmlview# (press the censorship, fiction section, it's at the top)
https://www.yourtango.com/2016290629/3-myths-about-women-rape-fantasies
https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/standard-deviations/201805/growing-up-kinky-research-shows-how-kink-identity-is-formed
https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/intuition/vol14/iss1/7/
https://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/1961to1999/1999-effects-of-pornography.html
https://www.aclu.org/documents/freedom-expression-arts-and-entertainment
https://www.treatmyocd.com/what-is-ocd/common-fears/if-i-like-lolicon-does-it-mean-im-a-pedophile-a-therapists-view
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/mobile/folders/1s2PL7TcWJfxDGzKn1M7jnMLViOI6Dvj_
https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/therapy-types/prolonged-exposure-therapy https://medium.com/howl-by-yael-wolfe/is-there-a-double-standard-when-it-comes-to-sexual-fantasies-b4c7798697aa
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-myths-sex/202003/why-are-rape-fantasies-so-common
https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/sexual-fantasies#novelty-adventure-and-variety
https://www.healthline.com/health/healthy-sex/sexual-fantasies#novelty-adventure-and-variety
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/slightly-blighty/201508/womens-sexual-fantasies-the-latest-scientific-research
https://goat.com.au/relationships/what-do-your-taboo-sexual-fantasies-say-about-you/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201010/sick-secret-sexual-fantasies
https://youtu.be/79fvyfrotug?si=LfKUqy3Ah-kbVcmG
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/mobile/folders/1s2PL7TcWJfxDGzKn1M7jnMLViOI6Dvj_
LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER
blah blah
LMFAOOO RIGHT IN THE TRAP
the fourth from the top has proven to be a document which is not even a study, although what in that document is, is partially correct, what is does is said to completely redeem and rid of the people who are into pedophilic produces.
Also the rest of them are rape. And all of these articles are not official articles by high end studies. Show me an official article from someone who’s been at least studying this.
So, my point? And yes, this is still about morality and also ANOTHER point is that they are Twitter users writing this and are not even taking morality up as a topic… these cannot even be an actual document of study?? Can it??? Moreover it seems they could be talking about an even more kid friendly lolicon stuff btw. Anyways these articles were of NO HELP. I actually feel sorry for you that you found these for no use
rape fantasies literally tie directly to lolisho as heir both taboo
Pedophilia cannot be diagnosed using lolisho as the only reason. Pedophilia needs a real child involved inappropriately with an adult for it to actually be pedophilia, otherwise it's just a fantasy
Their psychologists. With a degree in psychology. I think they should know about these topics
Only one document was written by a TWT user and they provided names of multiple professionals as to why fiction does not affect reality on a one to one basis
Lolicon is mostly about attraction they're definitely talking about sexual and physical attraction
Many of these links provide info about paraphilias, the reason behind taboo interests, and research conducted to test theories
I really don't understand how you can turn a blind eye to 'minors' (characters) being traumatized, abused, killed but the second sexual topics come up it's wrong
The reason why you see all the mentioned above as okay is because it's a
fictional character.
An object, a doll, a design
They do not have personhood, agency, boundaries or feelings
they're not real and have no capability to feel emotions
They cannot be disrespected
They exist solely to entertain real people in various ways, without harming anyone in the process
They are not people, stop treating them like victims and go help an actual survivor
Engaging in anything with violence does not mean you endorse it IRL. Since I can differentiate fiction and reality, I don't have thoughts about harming/exploiting real people who can experience trauma and go through horrific events
Of course there's going to be pedophile lolicons, but contrary to popular belief, 'proshippers' do not find that acceptable because it goes against the whole idea of fiction stays in fiction
This wasn't much of a problem until around 2020, when we were all isolated. These spaces are not for you, since the fandom culture here is mainly the mindset: 'Don't like, don't read' just like with many other sites and social media platforms
I'm sorry for ranting but I just find it so jarring that me and other CSA victims are being called predators all because of a fantasy (often used to cope) that is usually engaged in a safe, healthy environment
To add on, if you're having thoughts about children in sexual situations all because of a piece of media then I recommend looking into a professional, because sane people do not blur those lines
You’re entire paragraph were filled with links about “taboo interests” and somehow they end up all justifying humiliating things.
Yes people can have a rape kink and yes they can have a choking kink. That they justify. But that is not the same case here. Just because you like rape doesn’t mean you will justify and condone the behaviour of a rapist. Doesn’t mean you will accept and like a rapist character from a book you’re reading and justify him.
This is exactly what these people have been doing. It is WRONG to portray children like this. It’s the same theory as how women are affected due to the porn industry, especially when women dress younger and end up making “step bro step dad” videos.
If they really are great “psychologists” then why am I not getting their names? I’ve received only four names, that also it is a completely different topic, and in the end she asks for you guys to seek help too. (I think it’s a she?)
These are not trusted sites for I’ve already been thru most of these and as much as I want to say they are wrong, only two or more facts are almost correct, that is, it is okay to have a kink but it is to keep it to yourself. Nor should you go ahead and justify if that kink is used wrongly. That’s why “role plays” exist. This outrightly show it.
Instead of asking me to get help because “you can separate fiction from reality” I think you should get your average iq checked. It’s actually very idiotic and selfish to see only about yourself as this is attracting viewers of all kinds. YES, it affects children irl. This is the base, foundation where it starts. And don’t even get me started on “police are tired of finding cartoon cp as there are real kids who need help and are getting distracted from it” when most or maximum have done nothing or rather have been bribed and helped child trafficking cases while very few have actually come and helped kids. So many cases, if you’ve actually gone through any, had started with subtle indications as such and ended in drastic decisions so when police say these they could have stopped a monster by then.
I don’t actually think you understand but these links have NO POINT in this conversation at all because what you are trying to justify are minor “kinks” which is only for the sole of oneself and that also these studies are still very controversial and I do not believe are from trusted sources.
I also cannot understand why you bring up about abuse, that is completely different. That is also my point. It can be shown in abuse because WE WILL GET TO KNOW IT IS WRONG THAT WAY. We are made to know it’s wrong and that the action that is done is a wrong action.
That is my point, the situation is wrong.
If it were abuse and if it were psychological I would be reading this.
Since it is ROMANCE I will be blocking this.
“Don’t like, don’t read” mindset is that of somebody of no open mindedness. I mean, it’s not that I can actually ask for an open mind from people like you, but actually saying this doesn’t it disgust you?
Educated people seek to learn more than be closeted to only their comfort zones.
It’s humiliating how you just go “don’t like don’t read”
Sorry I will insult people who need to be insulted.
This frankly makes no sense bc by ur logic ur endorsing abuse simply under the guise of the psychological genre
Are we not talking about lolisho? In real life that would most definitely be considered abuse
Its the opposite, really
You criticize something that makes you uncomfortable. 'Dont like, dont read" means dont force urself into reading something ur not comfortable with, not bc of a lack of open mindedness
They entered the shota bakery with their own two feet and now complain that there's shota in their plate, like bffr