what is wrong with you? do you not know how serious doxxing is? it's a crime, and for good reason.
you're okay with harassing people, stripping them of their privacy and safety, and putting them at risk because they produced something that you don't agree with?? get a life
This is true. Although there are instances that it is used but not romanticized, there are rampant cases that they use the fiction card to draw their sexual fantasies especially that fucking child p*rn, I will never forgive anyone who would draw a child below 15 as a sexual object because who would draw that without a motive??
"It's better than an actual child being subjected to sex" fuck these pedophile enablers
Tho I don't agree with the doxxing one, you shouldn't easily dox someone
are you a westerner?
It's not better , the "fiction" is basically "normalizing" child p0rn and saying it's okay .
It's still as nasty as the real thing , cause it reflects the author fantasy.
( Makes me wonder if the author actually looks at kids in the way they draw them .)
And it's worst for the readers who read and enjoy it , YUCK.
The whole thing gives me the icks.
My favourite show is yellowjackets. That doesn't mean I want to cannibalise people or be cannibalised. But that's just me, I guess.
The dislikes ??? Well anyway you’re right op who gaf if they’re doxxed or not who told them to write such disgusting stuff and get away with it.
Hello??? Liking dark gore doesn't make you want to start murdering people but liking child porn DOES make you weird as fuck bro, there's no good reason to like child porn unless you are a pedophile
Exactly. Who the fuck watches/create child porn and isn’t a pedophile ?? Swear some of these people are dumb as fuck.
If you watch the show, purely or mostly because of cannibalism then you are exactly who I'm talking about.
But, if you watch it because you enjoy the plot of the show and the cannibalism wasn't just put there for show but actually has a logical reason, and it's not being romanticized. then you're okay.
You should know that these became a problem and are exacerbated in an uncontrollable manner mainly because they get to hide their identity, rendering them free from any consequences.
"Produced something I don't agree with" okay Drake, no need to get sensitive just cuz you're among the target audiences of the authors lol.
Its kinda funny how you're either in denial or so ignorant to the problem. You can't acknowledge the fact that their anonymity are the reason why they're practically free from social contempt when they draw their disturbing content. You probably don't know how problematic this is cuz you enjoy what they draw?
it's kinda funny how your response shows you're completely missing my point. read what i said again and think critically about its content instead of misinterpreting it to suit your agenda because i disagree with you.
i'm not even gonna bother engaging with your assumptions about me based on nothing. because you've shown you're so incapable of comprehending what people are saying if they don't suit your agenda, to the point that you make shit up to paint the opposing person to be morally wrong - it's really not worth any effort from me to respond.
I AM however going to criticise the way you doubled down on your wish to cause violence. This is not for your benefit since you obviously cannot comprehend a conflicting opinion as being an opinion worth considering - but this is for anyone else who is reading this and I hope they at least learn something from it.
Doxxing is a violation of human rights, because it involves the risk of violence, bullying, and harassment. not to mention the long-lasting psychological harm caused.
you think it's okay to strip people of their human rights? because they 'deserved' it? yea sure maybe today rapists and paedophiles lose their human rights. next week it'll be people who enjoy kink and transgender people. next month it'll be pro-abortionists and Muslims. do you not see the writing on the wall where there's a rise of extremist hate towards people who don't fit the white Anglo-Saxon Christian mould? if you allow one group to lose their human rights because 'they deserve it for drawing disturbing content', eventually many groups are going to lose their human rights, and one day it's going to affect YOU.
you should not be encouraging the removal of human rights from ANYONE. DO NOT allow a precedent to be made.
***
also one more thing - social contempt doesn't have the same violent connotations as online harassment and causing psychological harm. don't soften your language to mask the violence you want to inflict on people.
So the abuser gets to hide behind human rights , but can strip people of theirs . Justice is pretty bleak.
You made a valid point: if people start stripping abuser of human rights , then they will abuse it and strip innocent people rights.
Theres a need to DOX authors who romanticize and normalize like r*pe, child p*rn, ab*se.
Those who defend the authors, saying that it's just drawing, forget the fact that it makes the audiences tolerant at these subjects, contributing to the already rampant problematic groups.