
Honestly I really like this take on it. I think the author is ‘leaving things out’ to make us unsettled and kinda have us guess what is going to happen yk. Like we don’t know if agia is still wrapped around that woman’s finger and we don’t know what tf is wrong with Ken rn. And we have zero clue what vercike wants to do with the prophecy. Like I know he wants it completed but he hasn’t said what he thinks will happen after that. Bc if he completes it vampires are definitely not just going away bc he hasn’t made too many promises and he holds himself very accountable for promises. So I have no clue but we will see I guess.
After Vercike's partial backstory, I feel like there are more and more hints that Cain isn't as good as he was initially portrayed to be....
Like, he's the root and cause of their problems and the prophecy is part of some sinister plans that he may or may not have a hand in (i.e. it's not entirely by or due to the corrupt Aman)
What if this nagging feeling that we, readers, have about how we seem to be missing something is a deliberate choice to make us feel unsettled and uncertain of the developments, despite the good progress in Ken and Agia's relationship.....
Only time will tell.
Also, WHY WON'T YOU FUCKING ASK VERCIKE'S VERSION OF THE PROPHECY?!
- maybe they'll ask AFTER they did their research?
- IDK. My curiosity about that version of the prophecy is killing me