If it was an honest question it's fine, many families choose not to circumsize due to surgery risks, lack of clear and worthwhile benefits*(some people might say this, some may not) , and because they don't think it's morally right to cut that area off.
There are benefits for it on top of religious reasons of course, but neither the pros or cons outweigh each other [BY A CONSIDERABLE DEGREE], it's family preference. As long as you don't insult the people who dont partake in this practice (or do partake in it), you're good and not a POS (not that I'm saying there isn't a discussion to be had, it's just that appearance based arguments for actually choosing an important surgical procedure are disgusting made by anybody on either side)
I recommened doing more research done by health-based organizations with no biases and thoroughly digging through them since it is considered an important issue! I recommend not engaging with people who willingly choose to ignore what you say; arguments with certain types of people will get you nowhere and will just lead to toxicity instead of answers.
From what I've seen, there are clearer benefits to circumsizing, it's just that the benefits are minimal.
I'll respect anybodies decision, though. ^^
Just an add on, it doesn't seem like circumsition affects the sensitivity of the region.
Why is the the ml uncircumcised